All Channels
Popular
180°

Destiny Class Tuning - December Update

by Destiny Dev Team:
My name is Sage, and it's been my pleasure to guide the Sandbox for Destiny. At Bungie, we define the player "Sandbox" as anything the player directly interacts with. So Weapons, Subclasses, Abilities, Armor, Exotics, Vehicles, etc. If it feels good to move and shoot, ("Sweet!") that’s us. If it's totally broken or un-balanced, ("Boo!") that’s also us. We want the game to be amazing just as much as you do.

AnubisG3848d ago

They really screwed up Destiny for me with the constant weapon nerfs. I haven't touched it after I beat the Taken King, which by the way wasn't that great. That's just my own opinion.

Vitalogy3848d ago

Micro-transactions expanding? I wouldn't be surprised at all.

joab7773848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

This means nothing. It means bigger than the festival or the sparrow racing. Not sure about this non-dlc microtransactions content...

Most will disagree, but I'd rather pay $10-15/ month for constant updates and large patches, raids, etc. Events are great but they are usually free 5 x a yr in most mmo's as an added bonus.

Honestly, I'd prefer Destiny 2 to be free w the option to sub for $15/month. Those who do get silver to spend and a 10% xp bonus. This way, those who play 200 hrs a month can sub, and casuals can just play, Mayne contributing by buying some cosmetic items.

Also, the free price tag on the base game will entice many to come back who were burned by launch. Who can complain about $15/month if they play 20+ hrs a week and want top notch content every 2-3 months?

Honestly, everyone hates buying dlc, hates microtransactions, hates subs, and hates not having new content...what to do?

PainUzumaki3848d ago

Terrible idea...why pay monthly for something that doesnt even have dedicated servers. The raids are laggy every now and then and Crucible is even worse.

pringlec3848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

That is a terrible idea, the free price tag will not bring people back, not if they are real gamers anyway, it will make people think "oh great Bungie/Activision are scamming people again!" or "That game will be bad and will include pay-walls".

Micro-transactions/subs should stay with mobile gaming.

People will happily buy DLC if it is good quality and adds new content that is worth the price of the DLC.

Think expansion packs of gaming a few years ago, that is what people want.

What we are not willing to do is pay $10 for weapon packs, short cut packs, 1 - 2 new missions or any other type of pointless shitty DLC that is coming out these days.

TimelessDbz3848d ago

I agree destiny base game and destiny 2 base game needs to be free to play. Not enough content and always getting locked out when an expansion comes out.

110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans513d ago (Edited 513d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr512d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast661d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

661d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris661d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

661d ago
anast661d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole661d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast661d ago (Edited 661d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

661d ago
anast661d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 661d ago
Profchaos661d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_661d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981661d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140661d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85661d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj661d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman661d ago (Edited 661d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake661d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn661d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg661d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07661d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

660d ago
Knightofelemia660d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 660d ago
Chevalier660d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom661d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac661d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake661d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark661d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde661d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125660d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)