All Channels
Popular
620°

Is This The Nintendo NX’s Controller?

GamingBolt's Pramath Parijat does a full analysis of everything we know of the NX so far, and arrives at a final picture of what Nintendo's next console might be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Neonridr3824d ago

If the controller turns out to be what they are showing, it has some great potential. The fact that virtual buttons can be overlaid onto the controller's screen, thus not limited to any specific number of face buttons, is a great idea. Lots of flexibility that way. Although not having a physical button to press when you are not looking down at the controller would take a little getting used to.

I am eager to learn more about this over the coming months.

3824d ago Replies(6)
ABizzel13824d ago (Edited 3824d ago )

Virtual buttons rarely work as good as physical button in the vast majority of mobile games, and I don't expect this to be any different. In games like Pokemon virtual buttons are fine, but when you need a precise jump in Mario Virtual controls are awful, and would ruin Nintendo's handheld.

But this is simply a concept and patent, and as always the real world results will look much different from this.

But as I've said at this point the NX is more than likely a gaming tablet (and successor to 3DS) that's a complete redesign to the Wii U gamepad (much better form factor, better screen, with built in hardware), that syncs to the Wii U console and offers 4 player co-op (3 NX handhelds + 1 Wii-U gamepad) since the Wii U doesn't have to process anything for the NX gamepads since they have their own hardware.

They want to bridge Wii U, PC, and mobile. Well a tablet is a mobile device, with the right hardware it can function as a PC-like device, and mobile hardware has grown to be on par with Wii U and will be established in multiple devices in 2016 (aka NX rumored launch).

NVIDIA shield tablet already does all of this, and it's an amazing tablet except it has a dedicated controller instead of built in controls. NX seems to be this concept with better hardware, but backed by Nintendo. A win-win IMO, and honestly they direction they need to go to help push their handheld market back up to the +80m units it's known for.

Wanting to sell 20m (now down to 12m most likely due to production issues) makes a lot more sense with a handheld from Nintendo than a home console that could potentially cost $399 if n4g fans had their way.

A more powerful NVIDIA shield tablet, running full Nintendo games (from NES / GB - Wii U / 3DS, via emulation), at a $299 price is a big deal for Nintendo and its fans.

NVIDIA Shield Tablet second-look (a great video to watch since it shows plenty of it's features as well as a comparison between Tegra K1 and Tegra X1 in a 3D benchmark, and in 2016 mobile GPUs will be much closer to the Tegra X1 performance)
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Eurogamer NVIDIA Shield TV preview (same concept as the Tablet, but a console-like box using the Tegra X1 processor)
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

So as you can see these mobile processors are on par with PS360 (K1) and a good deal above them (X1) even with completely unoptimized games and APIs, so this makes for a perfect case for NX as a gaming tablet hybrid.

Neonridr3824d ago

I don't think the Wii U console will be good enough to sync to this device to offer any sort of increased performance. I don't think the internal networking features are good enough for this to matter.

I would fully expect to see a new "base" console of sorts.

Griever3824d ago

Agreed. You get no feedback through the sense of touch and dont know if you hit the button or not. Or if your thumb is even on the button anymore or not. Tried playing PS1 games on my smartphone but it is a real hassle. I stray away from the button frequently and have to look where the buttons are because I cant feel them.

ABizzel13824d ago (Edited 3824d ago )

@Neonridr

It would if it's only a video stream, instead of a full game steam. Don't get me wrong I expect a full brand new console to come eventually, but the Wii U will likely be the first hub device to power this concept.

The whole point Wii U didn't do it with multiple gamepads, is because it didn't have the power to do so, with a dedicated gaming tablet it does't have to supplement anything, because the tablets already have the hardware built in them, and at that point it's simply establishing a connection and streaming the display to multiple devices (no rendering necessary).

I'm sure we'll see a console eventually.

@Griever

Yeah, the on screen touch controller just doesn't work nearly as good as physical buttons. Some had haptic feedback, but even then it's still not the same or as accurate. They only work in games where accuracy isn't 100% necessary such as turned based RPGs.

donthate3824d ago

"touch" button hasn't had the same evolution as physical buttons yet so it is premature to say if it will or not. In some applications though, touch is better than physical, but we have to wait and see....

ABizzel13823d ago

@donthate

And in the vast majority of applications physical is significantly better than touch and motion. I'm all for innovation that works, but there simply needs to be dedicated controls as well.

The screen can be touch screen, but we still need thumbsticks and and buttons as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3823d ago
MasterCornholio3824d ago (Edited 3824d ago )

I use a controller to play SNES games on my tablet.

I hate virtual buttons since the lack of tactile feedback ruins response times. Which is why I can never get used to a virtual controller layout.

However there is a tech which can create physical buttons on a touchscreen. If Nintendo can implement that into their controller than I can see it being abviable option. However mechanical buttons will always he superior in my opinion.

http://rack.2.mshcdn.com/me...

bloop3824d ago

Did Susan get your dozen eggs, olive oil and condoms?

TheCommentator3824d ago

Bloop, it's going to be one hell of a date...

deathtok3824d ago

I'll preface this with telling you I'm a huge Nintendo fan BUT I'm turned off by this controller design.

1. I can't stand iOS games, the lack of physical buttons doesn't resonate with me.

2. Muscle memory and knowing the controller design well is important to many games (consider that panic moment when you hit a QTE and don't press square on your PS3 because you've been playing Xbox for a month)

3. Nintendo might not be considering that developers may not be capable of creating controller layouts (consider all of the terrible UIs that our out there).

RyanShutup3824d ago

No dude it sucks... I tried playing Megaman X on my iphone a few years ago... 90% of the time you'll miss the input because there's no feedback. It's finicky and just feels terrible. I'm praying that this isn't real or this will be the first nintendo console that I pass on. :(

UnHoly_One3824d ago

This is a terrible idea.

Touchscreen "buttons" are the worst thing ever.

showtimefolks3824d ago

Yeah keep doing your thing Nintendo

You are so out of touch with gaming world and 3rd party publishers

Gimmicks
Gimmicks
Gimmicks

And when nothing else more gimmicks

Make a hard core gaming console with all the feedback from 3rd party publishers and developers. Ask them what it would take to get 3rd party games to launch on Nintendo next console at the same time as ps4 and Xbox one

Make your console Atleast 25% stronger than current the consoles

For once stop screwing around and come join us in year 2015

And Nintendo fanboys stop overreacting to every rumor. This controller is nothing special but a damn gimmick

Gamers need controllers with buttons not some touch screen crap

Ninja_G_Aidan3824d ago

Wii U is a terrible console!

Knushwood Butt3824d ago

The only way they can churn out Mario Party 11 is to put it on some new platform with a gimmik that differentiates it from Mario Party 10.

Doge3824d ago

"And Nintendo fanboys stop overreacting to every rumor. This controller is nothing special but a damn gimmick "

Dude your whole post is an overreaction to a patent.

showtimefolks3824d ago

Doge

no it's not there is enough info leaked about their console already. do some research and you will realize that ninetndo is again going for gimmicks

they have the IP's, as a gamer i really want them to just make a core gaming consoles to compete with ps4/xbox one

wii caught fire but they are trying to get those casual gamers back when they have moved on

also nintendo is gonna make their home console into a mobile gaming machine watch. some along the line of a ipad/console

do some research. nintendo is trying to be like konami

3823d ago
showtimefolks3823d ago

bruce755

they want to be different so nintendo fanboys can claim that they are moving the gaming forward

how hard could it be? if i was running Nintendo these are the simple steps i would take.

1-Get in touch with 3rd party publishers and make sure that all their future games will be on my system

2-get in touch with as many developers as possible and ask them what they would like to see improved upon ps4/xbox one

3-make the system very easy to develop for using a blu-ray drive

4-look at how psn started and how xbox live started, look at what worked and what didn't. and now look at their survives today and try to atleast have a online system which is atleats trying to be on psr with xblive and psn(keep it free, yet still offer one free game per month)

5-make sure the system will be 25% stronger in power than current consoles. if not more. don't be bothered by a $399 or even a $449 price tag. if you deliver value gamers will support the system

6-a regular controller from developer feedback with button layout similar to ps4/xbox live

hire a lot of external talent to hand them some old games which they can remaster or remake.

have a clear plan to support the system well within first 12-14 months with a lot of AAA exclusives

open the platform for indies and don't put any restrictions on them

it's this simple. but don't worry nintendo will make a console which will be weaker than ps4 and charge $349 just to compete

Monster_Tard3823d ago

They also had the patent of the controller with the scroll wheels on it that popped up before this one did.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Either way it's gimmicky. I just want a updated Gamecube controller.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3823d ago
pcz3823d ago

WTF are those dials on the back? it looks like one of those 'bop it' toys

http://www.virginmedia.com/...

Aceman183823d ago

It took me awhile to get a WiiU, and judging by these pics here it will be longer to get their new system if this turns out to be true.

tontontam03823d ago

ZZZZ this guy haven't played enough games on his phone, he clearly does not know how annoying that can be.

Neonridr3820d ago

yeah, I use my phone for what it was intended for.

I have a PC, handhelds and consoles for my gaming needs.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3820d ago
3824d ago
Edvin19843824d ago

God damn it... wish nintendo would cut the shit and just give us a controller like the GameCube one and call it a day. I am enjoying my WiiU because of the great nintendo games, but at this rate they wont be around for to much longer. They need third party and wont get it with this crap.

nevin13824d ago

SNES style controller is better.

ABizzel13824d ago

It's a good concept, but the execution demoed here is a bad idea. The NX is more than likely going to be a gaming tablet with built-in controls (basically a much better looking Wii U gamepad, with built in processors).

And IMO that's not a bad thing for the successor to the 3DS, and a potential home console replacement via HDMI-out. Basically a tablet with a Wii U built in it, since mobile hardware is already on Wii U's level.

Vegamyster3824d ago

It's a simple drawing to give a general idea of what the controller might be and this doesn't mean Nintendo will even use it. We also don't know what the NX is -Handheld, Home console, hybrid ect-

Plus a controller won't determine Nintendo's 3rd party support, the Gamecube which you used as an example did not receive a ton of 3rd party support despite being a straight forward console aside from the small discs, they need to work with devs to get it and not expect them to just come.

DivineAssault 3824d ago

I hope it has physical buttons.. I hate touch panels for games

Moonman3823d ago (Edited 3823d ago )

I think it will have physical buttons if the console will retail for $299.

Like someone else said, this only seems like an option either bundled or sold alone as maybe a handheld concept that could work with the NX. That would seem like $399 to $499 territory to me.

All being said the shape of the controller seems comfortable. This cannot be taken as the final design by anyone who has seen patent concept to actual product in the past from Nintendo.

DivineAssault 3823d ago

It might nie even be for the NX anyway.. Patents are filed all the time that arent used for a generation or 2.. Sometimes not at all

Show all comments (100)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay33d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn234d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn233d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown34d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay33d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay33d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac33d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger34d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300034d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde34d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde33d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

Microsoft lifts the lid on Project Helix at GDC Festival of Gaming

The Xbox maker will begin sending alpha versions of Project Helix to developers starting in 2027.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
240°

Xbox Confirms 'Project Helix', Its Next-Gen Console That Will Also Play PC Games

New Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma, who took over as the head of the Xbox business last week as longtime Xbox boss Phil Spencer retired, has confirmed the codename for Xbox's next-generation console – Project Helix – and also confirmed long-swirling rumors that the device will play Xbox and PC games.

87d ago
dveio87d ago

Hm.

Selling to customers the benefits of Xbox Helix compared to a PC and Steam Machine will be the biggest task for Xbox' marketing, I suppose.

87d ago Replies(2)
87d ago Replies(5)
1Victor86d ago

I said when Xbox destroyed their future with with all their arrogance at the start of XBone”if they keep loosing money they only have 2 more generations before they exit the console market like sega.
This is their final chance to validate the existence of a console to the INVESTORS if this console fail as we all know without exclusives from the activision acquisition or their old exclusives for more than a year it’s game over for Xbox consoles.
Everyone know games will wait for a timed exclusive to go to their console of choice, Microsoft signed the Xbox console death certificate the moment they started PORTING ALL THEIR GAMES to other consoles.
Now my hope is that Valve gives Sony a run for their money and we get a good generation where they take risks and bring new experiences to the market.

86d ago
S2Killinit86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

They will make xbox “consoles”, but they actively downplay consoles because their business strategy is walled garden services

This is basically a PC w xbox logo

fr0sty86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

Xbox has put itself in a tough position... With current RAM prices, the system is going to cost a fortune (it's APU alone is $500-600, before you even get to the RAM, SSD, power supply, etc). So, we're looking at a 4 digit price tag, and it has the Gabecube to compete against now directly in that console space. It has no exclusive games at all. PS6 is coming in close in performance but expected to cost hundreds less, and PS6 Pro will likely again take the "most powerful crown" once it drops, but it will actually have exclusive games.

Not an easy sell to the general public, and not even an easy sell to the PC enthusiasts as it isn't powerful enough to justify paying that much for when you could just build a far more powerful PC for not much more $. If I'm dropping north of $1k on a game system, I'm going to want to go all out, not have mid-range performance. It'll be interesting how they plan on marketing this thing, and who they expect to buy it.

Reaper22_86d ago

Looks like you dont know what you're talking about.

1Victor86d ago

What changed?
Hey obscured 🤖🤖
I’ll explain it like to a IQ 9
Nothing has changed they kept loosing money and to please their INVESTORS Microsoft purchased activision and other developers spending more money they could make in WAAAAAY too long for the company CEO that love monetizing everything so they started porting to EVERYTHING they could (even fire stick🤣🤣).
Do you know why it’s called the big 3?
In the lat 70’s to early 80’ there was multiple companies with their own consoles each the market collapsed and only 2 survived, enter PlayStation, exit sega, exit google, Microsoft is destabilized and desperately start to port all their games EVERYWHERE, enter valve.

Now
W h a t do Y O U think w i l l h a p p e n t o
t h e 3rd leg of that triangle when one is warbling and a replacement is on the way.

GhostScholar86d ago

Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated….

1Victor86d ago

@ghost: “ Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated…”
Sure I’m not a scholar but it’s obvious that they aren’t going to be publishing their big franchises day one games on their competitors because of brotherly love for the gaming industry.
Unless and I know this is something a lot of Xbox hardcore fans like obscure can’t comprehend that a big corporation like Microsoft is loosing money gen after gen,
Money doesn’t come for free from big corporations Xbox gen 1 lost money on consoles sold. Xbox 360 lost money on repairs of the RROD Xbox One didn’t make the money they wanted, Xbox series hasn’t sold as well as expected and have a MASIVE LOAN from all the studios and a publisher purchase..
I’ll be waiting for your reply proving they are not loosing money. Oh I see you pulling that game pass card, put it back FCC filing by Microsoft said they didn’t make money from game pass.
NOW PROVE ME WRONG

mudakoshaka86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

They had to put them on other platforms. All the gaming companies they bought cost a LOT of money. Xbox is not sufficient to bring in new revenue, so the only choice is expanding your market share by releasing on other platforms that are clearly leading the market. It was not something they wanted but something they needed to do to recoup some of all the expenses.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 86d ago
peppeaccardo86d ago

I might be saying the obvious but any piece of hardware for as powerful as it could be, without an healthy portfolio of fun to play and engaging games is worth less tehn zero. So as long as the new XBOX will be marketed as the most powerful console on the planet and NOT as the ONLY place where true long lastying XBOX fans can impersonate their beloved characters/heroes this thing is going to fail big. I would love to think that Playstaiton is moving away from the PC ports also to keep its identity, the truth is that a console value is higher if that console is the only mean to access certain IPs. XBOX with gamepass and PC ports has depersonalized his player and fan base.
Just my two cents ... but I am sure there is some thurth in here.
Peace on !

Reaper22_86d ago

Xbox has a huge library of great games. This new console will be able to play them all. Thats what gamers care about the most.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 86d ago
87d ago Replies(1)
Deathdeliverer87d ago

The question will be if you have a PC, why buy a Xbox that plays PC and Xbox games… Unless they plan to have you buy a Xbox PC instead of a dedicated PC. Thats got to be the plan. Take some of the PC players and turn them into console PC players. They couldn’t give you full access to the PC/console like you can with a dedicated PC because you would think the piracy for the “dedicated” Xbox games would be crazy. Yeah, they are really going to have to explain who this is for. If you can install whatever you want then you would have Steam access. This directly copies the Steam box idea so I’m sure Steam isn’t happy about it. I guess time will tell.

87d ago
Rainbowcookie86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

Maybe it will be heavily subsidized so software sales will make up the loss to get it into peoples hands early and the system allows for a steam like environment. I think Sony knows since rumor has it that they will do less Pc ports.

derek86d ago

I dont think that's in the cards not with the 80 plus billion spent on gaming this gen. Microsoft aint subsidizing hardware anymore look how they've priced the series consoles and offered no deals this past holidays. Sony pulling away from pc ports is because there is no good rational for continuing to do so.

ABizzel186d ago (Edited 86d ago )

They don’t sell enough of the current Xbox consoles to heavily subsidize those platforms and in fact they increased in price, so I don’t see a future where this gets any. I think we’re looking at a $999 platform, which I mean is great for a GPU rumored to be on par with a full PC running a RTX 5070Ti/5080 equivalent depending on clocks, since those GPUs alone around $1000+.

I assume they’re going to do a two tiered system again, because a lowered cost version could be the significantly better option for PC gamers specifically the esports crowd who doesn’t upgrade all the time and don’t care about the highest specs. If they can do something around a RX 9060 with 16GB+ of VRAM for $499 then that would be the true winner because it gives those PC gamers a REAL substantial upgrade at a very reasonable price. It’ll also put a huge amount of pressure on the Steam Box.

isarai_lee86d ago

What i was wondering too, like best case scenario it's a PC with a bunch of restrictions on it, and when ALL their games on on PC, what is even the incentive here? 🤔

ABizzel186d ago (Edited 86d ago )

It builds a niche for them, and I’ve been saying they should have done this since the XBO. However, it’s still going to be a battle. Hardcore PC gamers are not leaving PC unless this is an ultimate steal in price:performance.

The rumored spec depending on clock speeds should place this around RTX 5070TI / 5080 performance which sounds insane, but the rumored launch in late 2027 and the RTX 5070Ti/5080 will be almost 3 years old by then.

But those GPUs are retailing around $1000, so what is this PC-Console hybrid going to cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 86d ago
MrNinosan87d ago

Basically a PC with an Xbox logo slapped on, just like the so called Xbox handheld.
My guess is it won't play my Xbox games I have on disc 🤔

87d ago
babadivad86d ago

Nah, the handheld IS a PC. It can stream Xbox games or play the PC version of those games with "play anywhere".

This sounds like it will play Xbox games natively, which is amazing if true.

I want to see more. I already have a powerful PC so I need to be sold on this before just diving in. Tech whore that I am. Seems very interesting so far, regardless.

DazaMc86d ago

Perhaps it will download a compatible version if you have the disc in.

Reaper22_86d ago

You just described all consoles. At the end of the day they're all PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 86d ago
Show all comments (122)