All Channels
Popular
430°

Does EA Have No Shame?

Electronic Arts has been one of the top three companies found at the forefront of everything that’s wrong in the gaming industry for years now. Normally many companies would take this as a hint and start thinking of new strategies to better their company, but not EA as Battlefront has shown.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
the_mack_attack33822d ago

Val Kilmer does not lie....So it must be true!

Spotie3822d ago

It doesn't take a "Real Genius" to figure that one out.

SpinalRemains1383822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

Bubble. It's a moral imperative.

saywat2473822d ago

ea doesnt usually have shame, but when they do...they don't :)

FlameBaitGod3822d ago

Well people keep buying their games so....y change if money keeps rolling in.

BeefCurtains3822d ago

They have a winning formula to maximize profits. They keep producing less content, requiring expensive DLC to get the whole game, and less quality control... All the while everyone keeps buying it up expecting something different than the last game they released.

Until this formula doesn't work, EA will keep cutting corners and producing less quality. They shamelessly exploit gamers.

PANDAB3822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

I'm sure they do actually. It's probably just packaged in a DLC wrap somewhere with a season pass pre-order bonus.

But on a serious note, you can't fault a company to milk money from an idea, it's what they do. The fault is with us gamers who gobble this up and simply encourage this sort of thing.

But I have to say ....paying people to fool gamers is a real low and disgusting practice.

chrisco84au3822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

Reading this thread, I would say maybe 1/4 of the people replying ave played the game for a decent amount of time, not the BETA, not EA access.THE GAME.

Now everyone can have their opinion and paying people to say a game is good is a no go but come on.

Its not a bad game, its actually a GREAT game with minimal content. The expansions will fix that. Is it worth your $$ now or in the future, only YOU can decide that, not me, not whoever disagrees in a fit to smash the disagree button to this comment only YOU.

For me, I love the game, am happy with the purchase and have bought the season pass. Now am I part of the 'problem'? Heck NO. I made my decision and I will live with it but do not say people who are happy to buy the game and season pass are part of a problem, when there is no problem, they made the choice with free will.

The problem is others telling others what they should and shouldn't do/buy/play. We all play for enjoyment and I am getting enjoyment from every second I play this game. My choice but don't say I contributed to a problem that does not exist with free will.

I hate Halo (personal preference and micro transactions) but I do not go into a Halo thread and play down the people getting enjoyment from the game, i let them enjoy it without being belittled.

If YOU don't like it, DO NOT BUY IT but stop playing the victim.

Oh and ALL the people criticizing forgot to mention that EA today announced a FREE new game mode with upcoming FREE new map/s. Wow, those deceiving money grabbers, anyone would think from the replies EA is some not for profit organization. Not a multi billion dollar company.....

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3822d ago
goldwyncq3822d ago

EA has long been lost to the dark side.

mep693822d ago

They do have cookies though.

Archmagel3822d ago

@mep

You must have gotten the season pass for that privilege. How much is the chocolate chip dlc?

Relientk773822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

No shame they have

*in Yoda voice*

Ark_3822d ago

... and ashamed you should be, if no shame you have.

FasterThanFTL13822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

They grossly overestimated the milking appeal of Star Wars: Battlefront thinking they would sell 13 million copies priced at $110 by March 31, 2016. If these stats are any indication they would be lucky to sell 1.3 million copies:

Currently online players

PC: 25,740 (24h peak: 33,337)

XBOXONE: 76,782 (24h peak: 80,174)

PS4: 124,185 (24h peak: 132,590)

Total: 226,707

DLConspiracy3822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

They have already stated they beat the Witcher 3 in copies sold. That's just physical discs though. Online players isn't actually the number of people total but rather the amount of people online at that time btw.

dkp233822d ago

It's a mp game. If people aren't online, what are they doing with the game ?

uth113822d ago

Not every gamer is online 24/7

DLConspiracy3822d ago (Edited 3822d ago )

@dkp

How many people online constitute "people aren't online"? Clearly there are people online. Some people play hours some play for tens of minutes at a time. Like Uth11 said. People aren't online 24/7.

When call of duty had numbers of how many people were online on 360 days there was between 10k and 100k at a time. So I dont consider these numbers to be accountable for nobody being online. Especially since cod had and has 10 times more copies sold.

dkp233822d ago

Ea did acknowledge softer sales than expected and hope for improvement. They are banking for a bump during g the movie release.

Doesn't sound so good so far for the game. If people are waiting they should wait until holiday xmas time for much cheaper deal.

This game isn't worth full price to me and add the $50 pass on top of it when new content is released in 2016.

Shinuz3821d ago

Exactly this game isn't worth the ridiculous asking price, well to me anyway.

dkp233822d ago

For a new game that just came out. A 24 hr stat with those low numbers for a game that is online only says a lot.

Throw in that this game is Star Wars too and ea admitting sales were didn't meet the low expectations. Not good.

JamesBroski3822d ago

You mean do gamers have no shame? They whine about EA, but keep buying their products.

_-EDMIX-_3822d ago

Thats the thing...who is "They"? Doesn't that mean clearly MOST who are buying those products are not all on boards or forums?

It means that "they" are not the folks on here, thus...we don't make up all gamers on earth. The folks who complain on here are a extremely small minority.

Yes...EA has lots of crap you can say against them, but lots of that actually applies to lots of the industry. I don't get people who put human characteristics with publishers or gaming companies.

Their job is to make money and if someone is confused about that, I have no clue what to tell you.

As crazy as it sounds, lots and LOTS of what people say about EA can even be applied to CDPR.

If you say publisher is "hated" based on such things, you can't just suddenly not apply it to other publishers that could be doing the same thing. In gaming I've noticed this, but it exist elsewhere too, you might see fans of politicians legit do the exact same thing.

They would dog on someone for a certain reason, yet not dog on another for doing the exact same thing, suddenly its not the same lol. In the eyes of business and the law, wrong is not a subjective idea, its a objective factual one.

ie you can't misrepresent a product, you can't just lie about something going into a product and have it really not be there and a bunch of other things.

So the idea of "shame" from a company makes zero sense, if your adding a human emotion or characteristic to a company, your already stating you don't even fully get the concept in the first place.

Jayszen3822d ago

Yes, agreed with much of what you say but do remember that corporations are run by humans and it is not unreasonable for us as gamers and consumers to expect these humans to have some morality and a bit of decency.

No one faults the right of EA to make money, that is what a business is set up to do. However, many corporations actually combine a hard-edged business ethos with consumer focus and deliver a product which may be expensive but still delivers on all fronts. With EA, however, they take a good thing and monetize every aspect of it and then squeeze costs down by reducing as much content and quality as is possible. What is worse is that they buy good devs and studios who if left to just get on with it, would give a steady supply of good games and consequently good profits but using the above method I have described they destroy the dev and the game. 'Command & Conquer' is one example of a franchise that just died under EA.

If anyone can be accused of a lack of shame, surely it is the people who run EA.

_-EDMIX-_3822d ago

@Jayszen- unless they are again misrepresenting a product, I see no harm.

They are being transparent with what your actually buying, the same thing your saying about EA, can be applied to all game publishers. You actually know not of how they even create their games.

Could "then squeeze costs down by reducing as much content and quality as is possible" not be applied to all publishers or developers? Do you not get your stating this as if a matter of fact no one else does.

Could the expansion packs of Witcher 3 not be stripped from the main game?

The reality is, even if it was....they are not breaking any laws by doing that, its their game, their product and they own the rights.

What they marketed teh title to be, is just that, anything else they release they are 100% free to actually do.

Unless they promised you that content, your buying what they marketed, not what you "think" is the full or final or complete or ultimate etc game.

Though many don't like the real facts surrounding that, they need to get you can't just add some emotional concept to business. Again, lots of what your saying can be applied to any other publisher or developer you don't even 100% know that for a matter of fact.

The reality is....does it even hold up to a court of law? Did they ever promise they were offering a game as a service and the service was to give you ever last item and feature the team was working on regardless?

Are you buying what was marketed or the actual IP? This is where none of what many on here state makes any type of sense.

You either buy it....or you don't. Its marketed to be something and the only wrong you can really state is if it wasn't what it was stated to actually be.

I've read nothing in the EULA of any game that suggest your buying everything the team touched.

They are telling you what it is, your are agreeing to either buy it or not. Its legit that black and white.

Feelings, emotional appeal, morality etc have no place in this concept.

Thunder_G0d_Bane3822d ago

Good thing I stuck by my guns and didn't buy this turd of a game.

Got me fallout 4, halo and destiny to enjoy. And soon the Witcher expansion.

Shinuz3821d ago

What about the bloodborne dlc?! :)

3822d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3821d ago
Show all comments (76)
40°

Best Star Wars Games Ranked by Replayability Guide

From SWTOR to KOTOR and Battlefront II, these are the best Star Wars games ranked by replayability. A guide to the games worth replaying today.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
80°

A Star Wars Battlefront 3 Has the Weight of a Galaxy on Its Shoulders

If a Star Wars Battlefront 3 was born of the series' recent hype, it would hopefully lean on every bit of Star Wars lore and iconography possible.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
80°

Battle of Jakku: Revisiting the Iconic Star Wars Battlefront Expansion 9 Years Later

Celebrate 9 years of the Battle of Jakku expansion in Star Wars Battlefront. Explore its legacy, epic gameplay, and impact on Star Wars lore.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
526d ago
526d ago
526d ago
526d ago