...your a good person to post that. Bubbles for your moral deeds.

Do you work for the MS PR department?

From the article:-

"The first one is PS4, followed by “Other” platforms (mainly mobile devices) and then we find the PC. The PC has managed to surpass all old-gen consoles, as well as Microsoft’s Xbox One."

PS4 > Mobile > PC > Xb1

I would only not play a Ubisoft game on PC due to performance, but if the performance is good, I just don't care.

I've never got a game due to community junk, like Steam, Origin, Uplay, PSN etc.

Most times I don't even do anything in them to care lol. I used Origin for BF3....yet I lived life still lol

I realized just how little I even used Steam features to care. If the performance is right and the price is low, I actually don't care if its on Steam, Origin, Uplay etc.

Mind you, I have over 50 plus Steam games, 80 plus boxed PC titles and maybe 5 or 6 Origin games. Only due to sales, some being given for free and I had to have it to play a certain title.

I like Steam a lot, but not enough to not play a game or something, if its a game I want, the price is right, the performance is right...I actually don't care what I'm downloading it from in terms of overlay.

Uplay is so integrated into Steam now a days, I don't even care. So this Uplay hate is totally irrational unless there's a Steam functionality that is none negotiable.

If you're going to hate something, hate Origin. EA simply insists on their platform exclusivity.

Not Ubisoft. Their games run great on the PC.

AC Unity averages 45-60 FPS on the PC with a 970 GTX. On the PS4 it still runs like crap. So this statement is utterly untrue.

No doubt. Remove uplay and idk optimize your games and that percent would be higher.

It definitely wouldn't be higher cause they would have to split profits. They would have to regularly sell 30% more copies to make the same on steam as uplay.