Jonathan Marx writes:
The current generation of home consoles got off to a flying start with Bethesda Softworks' release of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion for Xbox 360. That game brought a graphically-intensive open world that allowed players to experience a more in-depth, Western RPG. In Bethesda's latest title, Fallout 3, many of the lessons learned during the making of Oblivion have been brought to bear. As such, players can expect an absolutely massive world within which to play, explore, make decisions, and, of course, kick some ass!
For those of you unfamiliar with previous Fallout titles, the game takes place in a post-apocalyptic Earth that is still reeling from nuclear holocaust and its subsequent aftermath. In the case of Fallout 3, players will find themselves in a decimated Washington D.C. some 200 years after the meltdown of humanity. Within this world, players will find small enclaves of pioneers strewn throughout a landscape rife with iron robots, punk bandits, political factions, and high levels of radiation. I was fortunate enough to get a half hour of game time with this title in Los Angeles last month. At E3 2008, the playable demo featured the game in its entirety, but we had to start from the beginning vault. With just 30 minutes to tool around, I only got to see one outpost of villainy. Nevertheless, it was sufficient to see that this game is going to be loads of fun.
A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.
Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.
Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.
Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.
To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.
all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.
Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too
Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.
Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".
Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.
Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.
PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh
Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.
So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.
Fallout 3 game designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the upcoming remaster should revise the game's gunplay to be more modern.
Give us FO3 with all the dlc remastered like ESO. Load times faster, quality of life improvements, gun play improvements
I believe it shouldn't just be graphical they should make improvements where they can to make the game better. A simple face lift isn't what's needed
Still my favorite one. I remember getting a digital copy of FO3 when I got FO4(XBO). It was nice to finally play a stable version of the game. Then when I got a Series S it was an even better expierence. Quick resume and FPS boost made it feel like a whole new game. Updated gunplay would be very welcome though. One of the few things FO4 did better.
