Of course tastes differ, that's obvious to me, but not so obvious to this retard who commited this crime of releasing and writing this review.

"Until Dawn is very entertaining, but certainly not for everyone."

3.5/5

With that thinking you can make revieews just like that:

"GTA is very entertaining, but certainly not for everyone." - 3.5/5

"Mortal Kombat is very entertaining, but certainly not for everyone." - 3.5/5

"Forza is very entertaining, but certainly not for everyone." - 3.5/5

"The witcher is very entertaining, but certainly not for everyone." - 3.5/5

That's going full retard. You don't make reveiws with such statement, of course NO game is for EVERYONE. But giving a game a lower mark for that reason, because not everyone may find it to be 4/5 or 4.5/5 or 5/5 is f***** stupid!

And dislikie my comments as much as you like, little babies. I couldn't give a f*** more than I do now.

Calling someone a retard for writing a review you don't agree with is way out of line. Judging by your spiteful comment, you must be below the age of 16.

I kinda see what he's saying though. You don't mark down points as a reviewer if you like the game based on a hypothetical like that. Thought the game was good but since some people may not like it I'll mark it down. It seems ridiculous to me tbh. The review score is okay with me but that reasoning is pretty stupid and imo unprofessional.

It's not a taste differs type of thing with reasoning like that because that doesn't seem that it aligns with him personally rating the game. Seems pretty stupid I hope he doesn't review other games with this line.

Yeah, it's a real shame that some publishers still don't add trophies, I mean, even Disney do and they even update games to add them

Some PS2 classics have trophies so hopefully Soul Calibur 3 has it.

And ps1 classics not having trophies is dissapointing but at least they give you the new version for free if you bought the old ps1 classic.