
Luke Plunkett:
"The King is dead. Long live the King.
For almost as long as I’ve been comparing these two games—traditional “reviews” seemed increasingly pointless as the years wore on, especially since people generally only wanted to know which of the two they should side for—one has been outright better than the other. EA’s FIFA, flush with cash (and Premier League licenses), emerged around seven years ago as the dominant football title, superior to Konami’s rival PES series in almost every regard."

Like all great photographs, the covers of the FIFA and Pro Evolution Soccer video games capture a moment in time. But which ones have been best?

If you factor in how PSN also shows the total percentage of the playerbase with the same trophy, it's almost a database of behaviour.
For a "difficult game", I'm surprised almost 64,000 people got the platinum for Bloodborne. That game was worth it!
I still can't understand how there's not one Trophy with a 100% attained rate, especially when there are games that give them to you just for starting up the game
I understand its cool for gamers who like it but I hate the attitude of some people digging into others trophies and try to deride others. I even saw that happen for journalists trying to deride gamers who were giving their opinions.

FIFPlay: FIFA 16 TOTW 53 is available on September 14th, 2016 from 6pm UK time.
Messi is undoubtedly etter than Neymar.
So, obviuosly Fifa 16 is better than PES 16.
Better is subjective but I'm going for fifa 16
If you like football & can afford it, then I'd recommend buying both as they're both as good as eachother in different ways.
tried pes 2016 and fifa 16 ...pes is good yes , but still not as fluid as fifa atm .playing pes online is like watching a comedy show , can't stop laughing from ai mistakes .
FIFA well got the all important Fifa license even though many critics agreed PES 16 plays better. Up to the player to decide