All Channels
Popular
130°

Mario Doesn't Try Anymore

With the release of #SuperMarioMaker, Middle of Nowhere Gaming's Associate Editor Esteban Cuevas asks why Nintendo doesn't try to innovate with Mario anymore.

Read Full Story >>
middleofnowheregaming.com
Neonridr3888d ago

Well, I on the other hand feel that this game is a breath of fresh air. Finally letting the inner game designers in everyone create their own masterpiece levels.

You show me another game series as successful as Mario that allows you to create your own levels like this.. I can't think of any.

R00bot3888d ago

That's because there aren't any other game serie' as successful as Mario.
I would say LittleBigPlanet allows you to make levels, but it's not nearly as intuitive as Mario Maker.

-Foxtrot3888d ago

REALLY.....dude people have created unreal projects of LittleBigPlanet

Someone remade FFVII on it, can you remake that on Mario Maker?

franwex3888d ago

@Foxtrot
Well....Mario Maker was designed to create Mario levels; so I guess one cannot create FFVII. I honestly don't want to anyway. Creating simple levels that Mario can navigate sounds more fun. Little Big Planet I felt was too complex. Sure I COULD learn if I dedicate myself; but I didn't really have the patience.

deafdani3888d ago

Foxtrot,your rebuttal isn't a rebuttal at all.

The dude's point was that Mario Maker is more intuitive than Little Big Planet, and that is true. LBP's creation tools were pretty complex to use, compared to Mario Maker's.

Gwiz3888d ago

How is something intuitive when it's limited to a certain degree?while the UE is actually a real designer platform.Mario Maker to me is just a testament of Nintendo no longer knowing what to do with it.I can't even blame them lol,they've made so many games about Mario that the creative process would eventually come to an end.

Big_Game_Hunters3887d ago

@foxtrot
if i want to play FF7 i'll play ff7.
i love the LBP series. But i enjoyed making levels more than playing them. Most of those custom games are more about, "oh look i made street fighter" rather actually being that fun to play. Even the platformers aren't that great because the base LBP mechanics.

Mario maker on the other hand takes a series that defined the platforming genre, and gives you the ability to make great 2D platformers, instead of a bunch of meh game modes.

3-4-53887d ago

Foxtrot, lets be real, LBP mechanics are boring and slow and aren't fun to play.

It's only reddeming quality is the ability to create.

Without the ability to create, LBP isn't a good game.

STOP.

Mario has been a good game in numerous ways without the ability to create.

Your Obviously a fanboy who wants only what you want to be seen as good, and anything else you trash.

You do this daily.

We see through the BS.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3887d ago
MurDocINC3888d ago

Does Minecraft count? It's as successful as Mario and let's you create all sorts of things.

higgins783888d ago

I'm sorry. Minecraft is hugely successful, I agree, but possibly a fad? Lets see where Minecraft is in 30 years time, what it continues to offer in those 30 years, then we can talk...

MrBrofist3888d ago

Mindcraft is still very new. Its a hit but hardly as popular as Mario.
Hell, even your grand parents knows Mario.

Not downplaying Mindcraft's success but it hasn't payed it's dues just yet to rank as high as Mario. That's a tough act to follow

wonderfulmonkeyman3888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

This is the first time I've ever seen someone who claims to have no interest, have so much negative BS to say about something he claims to have no interest in.[shouldn't open one's mouth if they've got no interest in the first place]

And saying they've been the same game for the past several games in a row?
Who does this guy think he's kidding? Seriously?

More like Nintendo-bashing articles don't try anymore.XD

Let him be "disinterested".
His loss.XD

WeAreLegion3888d ago

What?

Super Mario 3D World had tons of innovative mechanics. They're always trying new things with Mario. They just like to throw out the classic side scrolling stuff sometimes, too. It's fun and it sells well. Good level design should be the important part.

higgins783888d ago

Its true. Apart from the Mario platforming series becoming a 4 dimensional racing sim I fail to see how Nintendo can innovate much more with the franchise, and yet they continually do, much to my surprise and amazement.

BenRage33888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Another sub-par article from another non-gamer. This is getting old. Go back to your Call of Duty Esteban. Why is it that the average video game article sounds like it is written by a petulant child?

The game didn't have what "I" wanted. This is what "I" think, and if it isn't what "I" like than it must suck. Grow up kiddo.

Nintendo tries harder than anyone to innovate and actually takes risks that don't always pay off. No one is perfect and Nintendo makes mistakes, but that doesn't mean they don't try. That's a very insulting thing to say.

donwel3888d ago

"Why is it that the average video game article sounds like it is written by a petulant child?"
Because that's precisely what they are m8, especially these days.

DefenderOfDoom23888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Finishing "Contra" on the NES with 2 players was very difficult without the "Konami code". Playing 2 player co-op thru a campaign should be a challenge .

I do agree that "Mario64" was the most innovative and fun Mario game to play.

I hope someone makes original DOOM levels with the new creation tools by ID Software, in the DOOM game coming out next spring .

N4g_null3888d ago

Oh they will. Heck most doom players could make those levels without looking at the old ones.

I'm really a fan of level editors going all the way back to doom era. Nintendo did them justice with this editor. It reminds me of mario paint.

Really looking forward to the nx and how it ties into the past. It seems the more power we see the more innovative nintendo can show to the casual gamer.

Show all comments (32)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7733d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer58d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi57d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer58d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot58d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno58d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay58d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno56d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK57d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)