120°

Face-Off: Mad Max

Digital Foundry:
The PC version of Mad Max may only deliver a relatively minor graphical upgrade over the console versions at 1080p, but the ability to run the game at 60fps provides a definite edge where gameplay is concerned. 1080p60 is easy to achieve on higher-end systems with room to breathe in terms of upwards scalability to 1440p and beyond. For those with lower-end hardware the game offers up plenty of adjustable settings ranging from texture quality and geometry complexity, to lighting and post-processing - allowing for plenty of scalability in order to achieve 30fps and 60fps on broad range of configurations. Mad Max appears well-optimised on PC and getting a satisfyingly playable experience with a good level of graphical quality should be easily achievable on most gaming-orientated PC set-ups.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Shinuz3883d ago

This game is clearly really well optimised, i'm getting an average of 130fps on my old i5 760 with a gtx 970 at 1080p with everything at max except aa.

Aggesan3883d ago

I have a i5 760 also, but with an old AMD 6870. Is it worth it getting a better GPU without upgrading the CPU, or does it bottleneck alot?

Shinuz3883d ago

I was thinking of changing my cpu for one of the newer from intel but after seeing the benchmarks I decided to keep my cpu for another year or two.

If you can I would suggest maybe overclock yours (mine is at 3.6ghz) and it'll be enough for any games currently out.

HaydenJameSmith3883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

So PS4 and X1 are identical. No need for the "who won" nonsense...

@ritchi
Oh I know, it is N4G afterall

ritchi453883d ago

Exactly. But unfortunately not everyone will shame that sentiment.

343_Guilty_Spark3883d ago

The PC version looks great as well as the others. Modest upgrade over the consoles. The Xbox One cersion and PS4 version look identical but the X1 performs slightly better.

MasterCornholio3883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

On rare occasions does it perform better which is what they said. They also said that the framerate difference is so many that you wouldn't notice it.

It really doesn't matter which console version you get since they are practically the same. However if you can play this game at 60FPS on PC its worth choosing that over the console versions.

That's the way it is.

"Both PS4 and Xbox One successfully delivered a locked 30fps update for prolonged durations, and for the most part dips in frame-rate are limited to minor one or two frame drops that have no tangible impact on gameplay. "

Volkama3883d ago

It's a rare win man!

Paint yourself green and join the party, the Xbox fans have saved up a lot of supplies waiting for the illusive favourable comparison :)

Volkama3883d ago

Also, even if you can only play the game at 30fps on PC it's probably the one to get. On account of the ~£11 price tag.

3883d ago
MasterCornholio3883d ago

@Sho

That just isn't true. As for the AF that's been fixed in the majority of games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3883d ago
Foehammer3883d ago (Edited 3883d ago )

Great to see the developers getting each version to the 1080p mark with a solid frame rate.

Hope to see the performance go up a notch with the implementation of DX12.

Then they can concentrate on bringing the additional features of Cloud Compute, like the destruction in Crackdown.or volumetric fog, and more NPC with better AI.

3883d ago
Macosan3883d ago

The other big difference between these version is price. $19.99 on PC as opposed to $59.99 on console.

brokenbracket3883d ago

That's pretty much the main reason why I love this game so much hahaha. It's the best 19 bucks I've ever spent in my life on a video game.

Show all comments (18)
120°

Mad Max Remains Criminally Underrated 9 Years Later

The Mad Max game, released in 2015 by Avalance Studio has turned 9 years old; is one of the most underrated games of recent times.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
thorstein602d ago

Yes it is. My only complaint with the game was one of the trophies tied to the time trials. I just thought it was tedious to try to go after it.

Other than that it was worth every penny.

SDuck602d ago

There's an unobtainable achievement tied to server gimmicks since the servers were shut down (for pc players, you can just get all other achievements and grab the save file with that achievement from nexusmod), but man do I love this game.
After Furiosa, I decided to go back and rewatch the original 3 movies and recognizing so many things on Mad Max 2 from the game made me appreciate the game even more!

RhinoGamer88602d ago

Agreed, so is Days Gone... shame.

ChasterMies602d ago

Oof no. It’s appropriately if not overrated.

ZeekQuattro602d ago

I still play it from time to time. Sucks it never took off as I remember looking forward to a possible sequel. Silly me.

Demetrius602d ago

On my 2nd playthrough and I still adore the vibe it gives

AAWELLS09601d ago

It def has a vibe to it and I agree its perfect for the game. Its such a shame it didnt get a sequel as I think it would've been their magnum opus.

Show all comments (9)
250°

Sorry George Miller, but you’re wrong about the Mad Max game

George Miller expressed dismay toward the 2015 Mad Max game recently, but Avalanche Studios' take on the lore is still so good to this day.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
lelo2play702d ago

Mad Max is a good game... George Miller should STFU.

Old_Scout701d ago

He didn't say it wasn't good. Maybe you should take your own advice and look past the articles misleading headline. Here's the actual quote. “wasn’t as good as we wanted it to, it wasn’t in our hands.” That is all he said about it.

S2Killinit701d ago (Edited 701d ago )

In my opinion the guy himself Is pretty mediocre, so I dont like how he talks as if he’s something special. I dont think he would know a good game if it hit him in the face.

StormSnooper701d ago (Edited 701d ago )

If George Miller had good taste he wouldn’t be wearing those ridiculous glasses.

-Foxtrot702d ago

I think the funny thing is if Kojima made a Mad Max game it would be so trippy and "out there" I don't think it would feel like Mad Max by the time he's done with it. This is why he's better off with original new IPs.

Kojima seems like a buzz word these film directors use because he's probably the only big name they've heard from the gaming industry.

Wretchedstain702d ago

Article is correct in my opinion, Miller is wrong. That Death Stranding II trailer is bonkers, looking forward to that in itself.

And I agree, unless Mr Kojima wants to change his tune, or laughably, be told what to do, you're right, it wouldn't be Mad Max or close.

porkChop702d ago

Yup, Kojima really doesn't suit Mad Max. Avalanche did a great job though. It looked, felt, and played like what I'd expect from a Mad Max game. I really enjoyed my time with it, and the sand storms were handled incredibly well.

jznrpg701d ago

I think Kojima could definitely make a great Mad Max game.

SubtilizZer701d ago

I disagree… I don’t want to see Kojima do Mad Max or whatever… But I disagree with your take. Kojima is first a huge fan of film. I think saying he wouldn’t be able to stick to the lore of the world that was built is kinda crazy.

I’m sure he would be able to stick to the creative confines of the source material fairly well. Chances are he’s a huge fan.

I’m sure he’s a bit of a”buzzword” sure but I’m willing to bet it’s mutual respect for his work as well.

TheGamingHounds702d ago

I never played it but the recent buzz around Mad Max has piqued my interest. Will check it out this year for sure

maelstromb702d ago (Edited 702d ago )

MM is not a perfect game by any means as it was held back by lots of repetitious, standard open-world copy and paste missions, but the devs SO perfectly captured the world, atmosphere, lore and brutality. It also just so happens to boast one of THE best photo modes out there and some of the most impressive explosions I've ever seen in a game to date. The car combat is of course another impressive standout, both vicious and fun. MM is a game which I have revisited multiple times since its release, and now having just seen Furiosa, I can feel it calling me back again.

There's a ton to love there, but I think you'll pickup on the areas where the devs struggled likely due to reigning in the scope, budget and time constraints, leading to an incredibly fun, albeit uneven experience. Though, as mentioned, it's absolutely a game worth experiencing once, and I truly hope you enjoy it. The game really does deserve a sequel.

victorMaje702d ago

Word for word. Exactly this. A lot of fun to be had in there. A true Mad Max game. Sequel can’t come soon enough.

gigoran8701d ago

and the fact that they originally had an American voice actor until everyone kicked up a big stink about it?

maelstromb702d ago

Honestly, Kojima would do the game justice, but given his studio's current workload, it's a bit far flung. I could much rather see Bend Studios (Days Gone dev) doing a Mad Max follow-up. I'm playing through DG right now for the first time and I see lots of similarities between the games to where imo Bend could develop an impressive MM sequel.

jznrpg701d ago

Bend does makes sense. But I’d rather they made Days Gone 2 (no multiplayer of course) as I really like the motorcycle and the hordes of zombies was a lot of fun.

VersusDMC702d ago

While i like the Mad Max game and think it's underrated...i don't know why people are mad at George Miller for not liking the game based on the IP he created. Especially since a lot of people hated it at release as well looking at that 69% metacritic.

-Foxtrot701d ago

I think the issue is the studio was told by higher ups and most likely himself to make something linear yet when they got a first look at it they didn’t like it and wanted something open world

The head guy was basically like “you’ve just hired an open world dev and forced them to do a linear game yet now you want open world which has just wasted a year of development which we could have done from the start”

I think that’s why people are p****** because of the context the lead dev at Avalanche has given us.

Show all comments (30)
120°

6 Games That Genuinely Deserve A Current-Gen Upgrade

Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.

thorstein740d ago

Mad Max is underrated. Such a fun game.

Cacabunga739d ago (Edited 739d ago )

RDR2 still looks astounding on PS4 Pro. i cannot imagine how it could look with a next gen upgrade.

JonTheGod739d ago (Edited 739d ago )

Probably not very different.

No idea why this article is highlighting recent beautiful graphically-advanced games and saying they need current gen makeovers. They already look better than most new releases; just compare Arkham Knight and Suicide Squad!

exputers739d ago

I see what you did there.

Yi-Long739d ago

It's obviously never gonna happen since Sony killed the game and studio, but Driveclub. Even in its current state, 10 years after release, it still puts many competitors to shame ...

Demetrius739d ago

I'm not into racing games but yeah I even looked at gameplay of that sometimes

redrum06711d ago

It's a shame they cancelled the game. Definitely the best racing game I've ever played on Playstation. Just got GT7, but it feels so slow and less arcade-y, which is to be expected of a sim racer of course, that I just enjoy it less.
Driveclub also graphically looked insanely good for its time. I wonder what a Driveclub 2 would look like for the PS5.

Demetrius739d ago

Mad max ikr! Far cry primal, it amuses me how ubisoft just left ac unity hanging, sadly most of the good staff left from rocksteady while being forced to make that abomination smh