All Channels
Popular
150°

Why Microsoft isn’t developing Minecraft 2.0

Since acquiring Swedish game studio Mojang last year for $2.5 billion, Microsoft has been letting the Minecraft development team, and huge fan community, stay its course. And for good reason, as the game has over 100 million registered users around the globe and remains atop Google’s YouTube lists for most popular “Let’s Play” video game videos.

jagiii3893d ago

Minecraft HoloLens is very cool.

Timesplitter143892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

Yes, but will it be the kind of thing people try for 1-2 days and then never touch again?

Highly likely. IMO Hololens has less potential to be a success than VR, simply because there is much less momentum behind it. And it also limits most of its games to being "spectator" games.

DigitalHope3892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

Hololens won't change gaming. Hololens will change the world.

Let me edit and explain before the hate pours in. VR will have a bigger overall impact of gaming. Hololens will have a bigger impact on the world. What I mean is I can see Hololens bringing in huge advancements in architecture, medical sciences, engineering and warfare.

Timesplitter143892d ago

It won't bring "advancements" to those things. It will just make a more entertaining way to visualize things.

-Foxtrot3893d ago

I honestly think they should take the best Mods out there, and I mean the big ones, buy them and improve on those features so they can be additions in the sequel.

Minecraft still feels bare bones, it hasn't evolved as well as it could have.

DragoonsScaleLegends3892d ago

Why would they buy mods when they can make them and make them better?

-Foxtrot3892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

I just kind of assumed they wouldn't want to be called out for "obviously taking" ideas from mods.

I mean I just thought they would do a nice thing and give the mods credit. These people have put a lot of time into them....be a bit shitty to nick their ideas.

SilverClock3892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

Yea whoever disagreed with you obviously hasn't used mods. Or is mentally insane. But hey I don't judge.

-Foxtrot3892d ago

I know.

If they did they would see have bare Minecraft really is and what potential it has

DragoonsScaleLegends3892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

There are lots of weather mods for Minecraft so if a proper weather system ever makes it into Minecraft does Microsoft have to credit everyone who made this type of mod?

In my opinion when you make a mod you should understand no matter what you make you do not own the game nor the content you make for it. Make your own game if you want to own the rights to it.

-Foxtrot3892d ago

I'm not talking about a mod that only adds a single feature. I'm talking about those massive ones which are like expansions.

http://minecraft.gamepedia....

or

http://www.mod-buildcraft.c...

Antifan3891d ago

Every modder has to sign an agreement that the developers can take any mod and implement them in some fashion in the original game. Did you know that potions, potion stands, villagers, hoppers were originally created by modders?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3891d ago
DarkOcelet3893d ago

Pretty sure its in development for Hololens. That will be their first big game for Hololens.

Sonyslave33892d ago Show
Sonyslave33892d ago

lol how did i get vote for trolling for saying MS should keep it on their products to move systems smh.

LifeInNZ3892d ago

Because it was a dumb suggestion given its currently on a number of platforms and continuing to pull in lots of support and money. Why alienate a huge part of your audience by going exlusive to a platform. Look at what happens when that happens with console gaming!

3892d ago
Timesplitter143892d ago

The goal is not to alienate your audience, but to make everyone move to your platform in order to kill off competitors. It is a powerful strategy considering Minecraft WOULD have that kind of power. I don't get why people flagged his comment as "trolling".

Oh wait, I do get why. It's because a disagree on N4G doesn't mean "I disagree". It means "I wish this weren't true"

maniacmayhem3892d ago

It's not a dumb suggestion, it's his own opinion and imagine if MS did make Minecraft exclusive and how they would move units or have people play their platform just to play a new Minecraft.

And what happened with console gaming? This type of practice is still going on right now with SFV, Tomb Raider and other deals made for one system. It must be fine if it's still going on to this day.

I've been seeing a lot of people's personal opinion getting marked as trolling. Opinions that are not even sparking a heated debate or putting down another system. It's a shame that this site is teaching and forcing people what they should say and what not to say.

Pogmathoin3892d ago

I am sure MS will have certain things around Minecraft that would be exclusive to Windows 10, maybe skins, editions and so on, but the game itself will be on anything. Saying Minecraft 2 should be exclusive is very dangerous here... Like bringing out the bible in Mecca....

Timesplitter143892d ago (Edited 3892d ago )

The problem is that he didn't say "I hope MS makes Minecraft exclusive".

He said "It would be in MS's best interest to make Minecraft exclusive".

You can definitely disagree with the first one, but you can't possibly disagree with the second one unless you can't add up 1 + 1

Pogmathoin3892d ago

1 +1 has never equalled 2 here anyway... MS owns Minecraft.... To say it would help making Minecraft 2 Windows 10/Xbox One exclusive is certainly not a trolling comment..... If I say Sony should make Project Morpheus exclusive to Sony platforms, it would not be tagged as trolling... As it fits the policy..... Good job sdoM........ Keep the blind eye.....

3892d ago Replies(2)
Antifan3891d ago (Edited 3891d ago )

It would be a very stupid move by MS. Alienating it's customers, no one is gonna buy it. Minecraft, and it's community will die overnight. It won't move systems because minecraft isn't a system mover. Everyone like it because of its accessible and flexible modding potential.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3891d ago
Show all comments (27)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio2d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing2d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster922d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit2d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing2d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster922d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay4d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn25d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn24d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown4d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay4d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay4d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac4d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger5d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30005d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde5d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde4d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent756d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_3d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.