All Channels
Popular
240°

Metal Gear Solid 5 PS4 vs Xbox One Graphics Comparison

This is it. A complete lowdown on the differences between the PS4 and Xbox One versions of Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain. Resolution, effects, the whole nine yards.

Note that since we completed this video, we've looked into the motion blur situation in a little more depth - it does seem that Xbox One uses lower precision masks for this effect though it's very barely noticeable in gameplay.

SpaceRanger3904d ago

Not much of a difference. Except in my opinion I'd recommend using your hard earned money to buy the better console version on all aspects to know that you're getting truly the best experience possible in everything.

I cannot wait to start it up! I've been eager to play a new installment since MGS4. Ground zeroes was too much of a tease for me lol

And for people who will defend against what I stated:

- It's the equivalent of two people ordering a steak for the same price, one gets a prime cut and the other get a choice cut.
Not everyone can tell the difference unless someone came and told you. Yeah you're both eating steak (like how both people play MGSV), but does it make it right to pay the same price for a less quality steak? Even if the quality differs by a little?

THC CELL3904d ago

Ps4 looks sharper, at least they are both playable and should be enjoyed. Great game

Gazondaily3904d ago

Mate it's not as simple as that. There are other factors as well that boil down to preference. I mean, the differences are minute. You may also for e.g, prefer the Xbox controller, or play with your mates on that console, prefer achievements etc.

For me, I reckon I'll get this on PS4. About to buy it today but work is hectic. I prefer trophies and that's pretty much the biggest reason for me picking it on PS4. But if the MP is good, then I'll pick the X1 version.

Slightly torn between the choices here.

joab7773904d ago

No you're not. While I agree that there are other factors for sure, you will get if for the PS4, unless all your friends get it for xbone. I have both and have friends on both, but why would I not get it on PS4?

Gazondaily3904d ago (Edited 3904d ago )

No I'm not what?

"I have both and have friends on both, but why would I not get it on PS4?"

Because of other preferences just like how I mentioned and how you agreed? I don't get what you're saying mate. More of my mates are on X1.

Gwynbleidd3904d ago

Thank you!

Both games look pretty much the same. Minute differences. On what platform you game depends on your prefence. What are some ppps worth compared to your favourite controller?
If you like a specific console environment better, would you trade off features for marginal graphical differences?

I get it, if the game would look like s**t on one platform, that you would get the significantly better looking version. I mean really huge differnces like different graphic assets.
But so far this gen IMO there are no multiplat titles that would fall into that category.

I don't get this "console war"! People chill out and game on the platform you like cause the multiplat games differences don't justify platform specific sacrifices.

Muerte24943904d ago

"But if the MP is good, then I'll pick the X1 version."

This is baffling me a little bit. Alot of people predict this game to sell like 3:1 when comparing the PS4 and Xbox One versions. You would literally be isolating yourself to a smaller community by opting to purchase this on an Xbox One (for MP or MGO). Not to mention this game will be exclusive in Japan and EU is Sony land. Unless you're planning on playing with Brazilians or Americans more than people closer to you, this just isn't logical at all.

Gazondaily3904d ago

@Muerte

What? You're making it sound like MGS online on Xbox One will be a barren wasteland. My mates are on Xbox so of course my primary concern is playing with them.

"Unless you're planning on playing with Brazilians or Americans more than people closer to you, this just isn't logical at all."

I think you're severely underestimating how many Europeans own am Xbox for me to enjoy MGS online. We are just 4-5 mates not hundreds of thousands.

Muerte24943903d ago (Edited 3903d ago )

Sorry to do this....

"I prefer trophies and that's pretty much the biggest reason for me picking it on PS4."

"My mates are on Xbox so of course my primary concern is playing with them."

It looks like you're shifting gears a bit. Is your biggest reason trophies for PS4 or playing with your "mates" on XB1?

Also I never said that people didn't own Xbox Ones in the EU, but that you would be constricting yourself to a smaller community for MP. You said and I quote: But if the MP is good, then I'll pick the X1 version. You didn't say anything about friends in your previous post. I'm just saying if MP (not friends) is your reasoning for picking up MGSV for X1, it would makes more sense to get it on PS4 because it would have a much larger online community.

Metal Gears Solid Ground Zero sold 3x more on PS4 than Xbox One
http://www.cinemablend.com/...

Gazondaily3903d ago

@Muerte

"It looks like you're shifting gears a bit. Is your biggest reason trophies for PS4 or playing with your "mates" on XB1?"

There's no gear shifting? Like I said,

"I prefer trophies and that's pretty much the biggest reason for me picking it on PS4. "

Trophies are my BIGGEST reason for picking this on PS4.

But if the online turns out to be a gem then Ive shot myself in the foot because most of my mates will be playing this on Xbox One and I won't be able to join them.

I don't know why my little dilemma is so hard to understand.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3903d ago
MattE3904d ago

You are correct.. I prefer a more stable framerate and better textures so have got on xb1

strickers3903d ago

According to Digital Foundry, you've made an error.

MattE3903d ago

So xb1 doesn't have an advantage with framerate?

I don't need DF to tell me anything.. Can clearly see softer textures on ps4 version?

Muerte24943904d ago

I love my PS4 but to be fair the better version would be to play this game on PC @ 4K or 2K. Since I'm a trophy nutt, I'm going to be picking this one up on consoles. But if you really want to play this game at it's best and you have a decent PC gaming, stronger than current gen consoles, the PC is the way to go. I might end up buying it for both.

Kiwi663904d ago

I'm baffled as to why you'd get it on ps4 when by your own words the pc version is the best yet you still have a choice but you don't like the fact that others also have a choice of which console version they prefer for whatever reason, for me if my sons or friends were to get it on xb1 then thats the one i'd get as that would be my choice or will that baffle you also

raWfodog3903d ago

@ MrKrispy

Why are you 'baffled' that he's getting it on PS4? He already said that its cause he's a 'trophy nutt'. Mystery solved :)

Kiwi663903d ago

So there isn't much difference between the console versions and you're telling people to get the version that you prefer and not let them decide for themselves on which version to get based on their preferences

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3903d ago
Julion07153904d ago

Dude jus be ready to play the game when it releases stop spreading none sense

GenuineGamer3904d ago

99 percent the same. Cant go wrong with either.

pandehz3904d ago

LoL its pretty much the same

PudgeyBurrito3904d ago

PS4 Version looks the best. Ill go that route. Nothing new here really.

Show all comments (32)
40°

Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain - Brutal Backlog

Over ten years after its release, does Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain still impress? Jump Dash Roll returns to Snake's world for this Brutal Backlog.

Read Full Story >>
jumpdashroll.com
CrimsonWing6972d ago

I don’t think I’ve ever quite experienced an unfinished game that was slapped together with duct tape and construction paper to be sold as a finished product, basically making you replay the same missions and include a story that clearly was missing so much of the plot, like I did with this game.

I’m actually shocked that it doesn’t get calls out for this more.

franwex72d ago

It did. But the gameplay loop is still pretty good.

70°

CoPilot: Gaming Chat is an amazing revelation - A true gamer friend at your side

CG writes: In this video, we take Microsoft's Copilot for a spin and talk about gaming and AI influences, and the implications of that. We talked about a possible Metal Gear Solid V remaster, Deus Ex remaster, Hitman Blood-Money mission, and more. Imagine trying to talk gaming with non-gaming friends in real-life and after 5 seconds, they switch off and possibly yawn. Well, CoPilot isn't like that, instead it's like talking to a like-minded gaming fan who is totally on your level. The public version of CoPilot released in Feb 2023 and already it's become almost indistinguishable from a real person.

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
210°

Metal Gear Solid 5, Nearly After A Decade, Is Still A Timeless Classic

The Metal Gear series, led by Kojima, pioneered the stealth genre, creating a masterclass in storytelling and gameplay.

SimpleSlave703d ago (Edited 703d ago )

No. But MGS5: Ground Zeroes might actually be one of the greatest Game Demo ever, if not the best.

xHeavYx703d ago

I know a lot of people didn't, but I actually liked that story twist at the end. The game was fun and all, but I wouldn't call it a timeless classic.

Cacabunga702d ago

Metal Gear legend stopped with number 4.
MGS5 needed a year or 2 more of development to be maybe among the classics.. it was clearly rushed, especially at the end. The story teaches us absolutely nothing new.

just_looken703d ago

A demo is free that was a $40 cry for help as later we would know konami did not want to fun hideo and his team anymore that is why we got the unfinished phantom pain.

-Foxtrot703d ago (Edited 703d ago )

Meh

Great stealth gameplay but the game was just average.

Bland open world that felt lifeless, the story felt shoehorned in, unfinished story etc. The whole thing was just average to me compared to the other main titled games.

I would have rather preferred it if they kept Ground Zeroes for the main game as the opening and the rest of the game turns into a Metal Gear 1 & 2 remake to bring things full circle.

just_looken703d ago

If you dig around they had old behind trhe scenes of phantom pain vids and books wrote around the time.

Before funding was puled the main idea was to keep peace walker coop it was in the games early builds and that end game were your building your base that was suppose to be metal gear one.

You as the fake big boss was going to make your own metal gear one map aka your base (outer heaven) then me as sold snake use the mode that is in the game invade/defeat the base even fight your current version of metal gear that was in the game but not finished.

So your idea was on the table bit got canned.

CrimsonWing69703d ago (Edited 703d ago )

Like hell it is. That was the first time I became aware of being sold an unfinished game and was blown away about blind fanboys saying it was some perfect game.

Yea, the first few chapters were great until they do that thing halfway and make you replay all the missions again. Then little things like capturing animals but only seeing a JPEG unlike 3 where everything was modeled out. Areas were massive, desolate, and boring to look at.

Game was a massive let down for me and the potential was so high for it. Honestly, this was one of the most disappointing games I ever played. What’s worse is it starts off brilliant. You literally play through until you get to the point where you could tell they just stopped developing and then quickly used glue and construction paper to “finish” it and then sold it. Quite frankly, that’s insulting to consumers and fans.

Inverno703d ago

People have selective memory. This game had huge drama attached to it, what Konami did to Kojima and this game was horrible. Now they praise Konami cause they revived Silent Hill, even though SH looks half arsed too.

CrimsonWing69703d ago

I dunno if they’re getting much praise after the Silent Hill 2 debacle. Makes me scared sh*tless for the MGS 3 Remake…

Michiel1989702d ago

I don't wanna defend konami, but Kojima had 7 years to make the game, it's not that weird for a publisher to expect a game to be finished in that amount of time.

Also no one is praising konami from what I've seen, they're just excited that a Silent Hill game is releasing

CrimsonWing69702d ago (Edited 702d ago )

@Michiel1989

You’re absolutely correct. Look, the dude is a visionary and has brought us some incredible games, but he constantly would go over budget and could never stick to a deadline. I don’t know if people remember the MGS 4 trailers but it became a joke when you’d see a release date and then they crossed it out in the next trailer to give another.

What a lot of people don’t know is there’s a certain amount of money given for development and marketing. When you go over the budget and add additional marketing over the deadline it isn’t cheap. MGS GZ and V were laughable to me for the amount of time he had to develop them and he spent even more time on the engine that wasn’t anything revolutionary to me. I mean, GZ was nothing more than a demo and they released that art like $40 I think, probably to further help fund V. He then spent money for Kiefer Sutherland who did nothing for the character, which I think Kojima just wanted because he’s a fan.

Konami just had enough and said this is the deadline and you’re done after this. It’s business, but fans took it personal. I mean look at this Overdose game he’s been doing.,, like when is that ever coming out?

Michiel1989701d ago

I kind of forgot about overdose but yeah exactly my thoughts. He has made some of the best games out there and definitely deserves time to create his new masterpiece, but it's not a bottomless well.

This is pure speculation but I imagine he got around 4 years to make the game excluding pre-production. If after those 4 years the game is nowhere near being done, the relationship will be strained between them one way or another.

about the konami being praised thing, if let's say blizzard announces world of warcraft 2 today I'll be excited as hell for the game, but that doesn't mean my opinion of blizzard changes only a tiny bit cause they're still trash.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 701d ago
Yui_Suzumiya702d ago

Yeah, it was the only MGS I didn't play and this is coming from someone who got back into gaming after skipping a generation due to MGS4 back in 2008. It just seems to be the complete opposite of the MGS I always knew and loved (1-4).

JEECE703d ago

Yes and no. In many ways in was a great game; there's a very strong argument that it has the best gameplay of any MGS game, and that it is one of the more interesting open world "playgrounds" we have gotten, in terms of how the world operates. But as an MGS narrative, it is pretty far down the list, for many reasons.

Storm23703d ago

I don't think there is any argument. The gameplay was incredible. But yeah...disappointed in the rest. Could have been incredible but...well...we all know what happened...

JEECE701d ago

I don't think there is much of one either but apparently some people found the world very boring compared to the more linear structures of other entries so I didn't make a definitive statement in order to acknowledge the outliers.

DarXyde702d ago

The thing about Metal Gear Solid is that the narrative is what determines which is your favorite because the gameplay had ALWAYS improved with every mainline entry. It's amazing.

If it was gameplay, we'd all say The Phantom Pain, but the story is what truly sets them apart.

For me, that's Snake Eater, which is also my favorite game of all time.

JEECE701d ago

That's my favorite too, particularly if we are talking about the subsistence version with camera control.

Fishy Fingers703d ago

For me, best gameplay, worst, everything else.

Storm23703d ago

Yeah...gameplay was so damn good.

Show all comments (36)