All Channels
Popular
170°

Why Scalebound, Crackdown 3 and Quantum Break aren't coming to PC

Microsoft showed Crackdown 3, Scalebound and Quantum Break at the Xbox conference this week. If Microsoft are planning to make Windows 10 part of the Xbox ecosystem, why not bring those games to PC? so PC world put the question to the head of Microsoft's Xbox division, Phil Spencer.

StrayaKNT3930d ago

They obviously won't but I hope atleast crackdown does and we get to do cross play and use mods that would be INSANE.

Highly doubt they will come to pc, maybe down the line when they stop selling and xbox owners have finished them and moved on Microsoft might want to put them on pc? Doubt it though.

bicfitness3930d ago

"It’s not to say those games could never come to Windows..." Why not take 5s to read the article? It's a non-emphatic statement filled with vagaries and guesswork. They won't come AT LAUNCH. Sounds as if what happens thereafter is still in question, and MS (just like Capcom/ SE/ Namco) isn't dumb enough to cannibalize sales on their console versions until they're out in the wild for while.

To be fair, the flamebait title doesn't help matters.

RiseofScorpio3930d ago

Or he doesn't want to burn bridges and say "never coming to PC haha".

freshslicepizza3930d ago

what about recore, is that coming to the pc?

we all know the real reasons why games like quantum break are for now exclusive to the xbox is because microsoft is caught in the middle of trying to promote windows while at the same time trying to promote the xbox one.

they also likely don't want games like halo 5 to have online with both pc and xbox gamers since the pc has an edge in competitive play. the mouse is just more accurate. all they need to do is separate the online and not have cross play multiplayer. they could still have halo 5 on the pc. at least halo 6 should for all intense purposes be also on the pc.

many here seem to think allowing xbox games on the pc will cannibalize the console market. that's not true. you still have a very sizeable market that is interested in a closed box for relatively cheap investment. nintendo is the only company who still thinks you can only play their games on their hardware. this is why they continue to make hardware that is unique.

Genuine-User3930d ago (Edited 3930d ago )

Quantum Break will most probably make its way to PC in a year or two. Remedy titles have appeard on PC since Max Payne.

RiseofScorpio3930d ago (Edited 3930d ago )

@Genuine

Microsoft doesn't own Alan Wake and Remedy had to ask MS to put it on PC 2 years after 360. Whereas this time Microsoft owns QB and it makes no sense (no multiplayer/crossplay) for it to be on PC unless Remedy campaigns for it to be which I doubt since they let MS own the IP.

Genuine-User3930d ago

@Waluigi_isunderrated

I guess you have a point. Time will tell.

4Sh0w3930d ago (Edited 3930d ago )

Yeah I just explained this situation multiple times in 1 thread to someone who wanted debate why microsoft will support pc with all its high profile games. As I explained it would make terribble business sense to make all their exclusives that they have a huge financial investment in available on pc. Dont get me wrong pc support is good and there are profits to be made on pc but they need to proritize X1 1st because if you are talking all or most all of their biggest exclusives day and date with X1 version then X1 sales will take a significant hit. I think bringing some of their big games 1-2 yrs later would be fine as those really interested in said game isnt going to wait years for each X1 exclusive to finally come to pc.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3930d ago
BallsEye3930d ago

mods for crackdown? not possible as stuff is done on server side. Server side version and client version need to be exactly same.

Perjoss3930d ago

Only the multiplayer sie of things work this way, single player is just a normal game.

Dark_king3930d ago

while true they do you could always rent servers to host the game with mods.I mean that is what MS's azure is really for company's to rent.

dcbronco3930d ago

I wouldn't say it can't be done. If the pieces used to build the mod carry the same physics based makeup there is no reason it couldn't be done. So if you add a Warthog from Halo like in Forge, the real physics are already a part of that particular item. They could then add a viability test using the cloud to see if structures are viable.

You build a castle that doesn't have the thickness in the foundation to hold the weight of the structure and it collapses in the test. You get an analysis of what went wrong. Actually think of this for the implications for the next Minecraft.

BallsEye3930d ago

@Perjoss

Not if SP is using cloud for destruction. I don't think crackdown has offline mode. It would make no sense.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3930d ago
Aenea3930d ago

But, but, but, PCs aren't designed to support Da Cloudz! :p

NinjaNick3924d ago (Edited 3924d ago )

The X1 is a gaming pc. It runs Win 10. It supports the cloud. So can any PC with that OS, if MS allows it.

Rookie_Monster3930d ago

Oh well. AT least KI and Halo Wars are coming. There are certain games that belongs on consoles and some works well with crossplay beteeen platform like fighters abd RTS and a Game like Fable legendss. I never expected anyone of these new Gamescom xb1 IPS to be on PC.

FlexLuger3930d ago

I agree. while some XB1 titles will come to PC, in the broader windows cross play scope of things, I dont see key xbox titles going anywhere. Forza and halo will stay put. as will scalebound, crackdown and recore. Ill bet money on that.

But a game set in the halo universe..odst 2 perhaps? for sure? they have already announced halo wars for PC. I see new IP that exploit cross play being key, here. or old IP getting a cross play spin off, like fable legends and halowars. It makes total sense without diminishing the appeal of the xbox.

JsonHenry3930d ago

Can't say I'm personally interested in any of those titles but I know there will be a lot of people upset.

Most likely they wouldn't bring Crackdown to PC because then they'd have to admit all those physics are not really powered by the cloud as much as they say when a single mid-range PC could do the job.

Sonyslave33930d ago

You do know their cloud work on PC -___-

JsonHenry3930d ago

Yes, but its not needed for such a low end game when one Nvidia card with Physx can do the job. lol

NinjaNick3924d ago (Edited 3924d ago )

They said it took 14 servers to calculate the destruction in that one Crackdown multiplayer vid and that even a high-end dev PC couldn't run it alone. So how is a single gpu going to?? Unless you're saying they lied..

Or do you just have no concept of the amount of calculations required for something of this caliber? And why isn't there a pc game with such destruction then, if you can run it with a consumer gpu?

Dynasty20213930d ago (Edited 3930d ago )

Most PC users don't want the vast majority of console exclusives anyway.

If we did, we'd have petitions. We did it with the Dark Souls series, and the games are best played there now - looks and runs better, and we're not reliant on PSN/Live to be working.

We didn't scream for Phantom Pain to come to PC, yet Kojima saw Steam for how incredible it is, and how strong the PC gaming community is, and decided yes, lets bring Metal Gear properly to the PC. If Ground Zeroes is anything to go by, Phantom Pain will look and run FAR better on PC as proven by Konami's screenshot comparisons. Ground Zeroes was one of the best ports ever made for PC. It runs flawlessly.

The inconvenient truth for console owners bragging about their exclusives not being on PC, is that PC players don't want them, because we prefer quality games.

Proven by how poorly a lot of first-on-consoles games sell.

If Uncharted suddenly came to PC, you'd get a few 10s of thousands of sales, maybe 100,000.

Aenea3930d ago

"Most PC users don't want the vast majority of console exclusives anyway."

Bloodborne?

starchild3930d ago

Can't say I agree with you guys. I do the majority of my gaming on PC and I say 'the more games the better'. We're not all going to like the same things, but having more options is always a good thing.

Personally, I've enjoyed every Remedy game and I'll be disappointed if Quantum Break doesn't eventually make its way to PC.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3924d ago
corroios3930d ago

QB will come to the PC, but the other two i wont put my hands on the fire.

BlackPanther3930d ago

Why are you so sure QB comes to PC? Because Alan Wake came to PC, that isn't a definitive that QB goes as well.

RiseofScorpio3930d ago (Edited 3930d ago )

Microsoft doesn't own Alan Wake and Remedy had to ask MS to put it on PC 2 years after 360. Whereas this time Microsoft owns QB and it makes no sense for it to be on PC unless Remedy campaigns for it to be.

corroios3930d ago

because Phil Spencer already talk about the relationship with PC, it changed.

Fro_xoxo3930d ago

It doesn't matter where else they go. .
so long as they doesn't appear on a rival platform which the PC isn't.

ScorpiusX3930d ago

Or sold thru Steam all is good .

christocolus3930d ago

@fro

Exactly. It is obvious we will never see these games on any rival platform and in his interview with eurogamer Phil said they had more titles planned for 2016 so im guessing maybe we'll get sequels to crimson skies and mech assault announcements at E3 next year and both games will feature crossplay with windows gamers.

Show all comments (52)
80°

Phil Spencer Was Good for Xbox, but His Legacy Is Complicated

Was Phil Spencer good for Xbox? Whatever you think of the retiring boss’s decade-plus tenure, there was rarely a dull moment.

Lightning7766d ago

Too soon to say. What if things are more of the same? That's my biggest fear.

KyRo65d ago

You don't get rid of big portions of a division to replace them to do the same thing. MS has been critical of Xbox for a few years now.

As a Sony fan, I hope they can bring competition back to Sony because I think Sony have become very complacent the generation. They haven't had time try and whilst there's been a few good exclusives, nothing on the level or as memorable as previous PS generations.

S2Killinit65d ago

I disagree with your blanket statement but overall yeah I think they need to step up more. However, I’m not sure that has anything with xbox but rather with the disruptions we had at the beginning of the generation. Covid, and then the shortage in chips, then the ram…

MrDead65d ago

Yes the industry and it's workforce thank Phil for the massive industry consolidation, thousands fired and still being fired because of MS buyups and for making people like Bobby Kotick even richer.

Reaper22_65d ago

Thats true. Bobby did get a little richer. But name a CEO who isn't rich or getting richer. When I look around the industry I see a bunch of people getting fired. Not just from Microsoft. That is, unless you think the devs from Bluepoint deserved to be fired. Unfortunately, things like this will continue to happen whether you like it or not.

MrDead64d ago

Can you list other companies that are doing mass layoffs because of spending $80 billion on massive industry consolidation? Can you list other companies that purchased two of the largest publishers to make the industry less competitive?

Your fangirling over MS's corporate greed doesn't work on me kid, it does expose you though.

CrashMania65d ago

Was he? It became slightly better after he took over, but it turned in to a gen of just halo gears and forza. And he tried to monopolise massive parts of the industry with ridiculous acquisitions that ironically lead to the opposite, a near complete collapse of xbox console sales, and putting their tentpole IPs everywhere, all but abandoning xbox consoles going forward for a PC disguised like one.

Reaper22_65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

Id say his legacy is complicated, but if you focus on all the bad and ignore the positive things anyone can seem bad. He did have some positive impacts on the xbox platform.
Launched and grew Gamepass-
Invested in backwards compatibilty enabling thousands of older titles to play on modern hardware-
Grew the xbox box first party lineup
Brought xbox into the PC space
Hardware and feature improvements for xbox consoles
Pushed for cross-play support

And there's more but if you asked xbox gamers they'd say that he is viewed as overall a positive thing for the brand. No one expects non xbox gamers to say many positive things about him or the brand. Project Helix happened under his leadership and that is seen as a positive for the brand too.

SonyStyled65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

Launching and growing Gamepass as a positive? When it was $1 absolutely! This is also what fueled the death of Xbox as the standard living room console

TiredGamer65d ago

Agree. With how XBox imploded after the attempt to monopolize the industry, and one of the worst launches of a new console, we might be edging to Phil being a disaster to Xbox in the long run.

MDTunkown65d ago

He was good the first 6 months as the lead

Agent7564d ago

Then he forgot about the games. Poor Phil.

Show all comments (31)
330°

Phil Spencer Retiring, Sarah Bond Out, Microsoft AI Exec Asha Sharma Named New Xbox Boss

Big changes are being made at the top of Microsoft's gaming division.

CrashMania86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

MS knack for one upping bad news from other companies so soon afterwards is pretty astounding lol. Can't say I'm surprised though, this gen has been dreadful for the xbox brand.

Being replaced by an AI boss exec though, yikes.

86d ago Replies(8)
-Foxtrot86d ago

I always had this theory that they both wait to see if the other announces something bad so they can announce their bad thing, thus the two talking points bleed together enough to cause overall confusion online.

It then becomes just a big bad thing for the industry rather than a specific company. Wouldn't be surprised if Ubisoft were up next again at this point.

Eonjay85d ago

I have to agree with you. As if this decision was made today. Yeah right lol

darthv7286d ago (Edited 86d ago )

Huh... well that is sure interesting.

@crash, is it bad news though? I mean many here have said he needed to leave... now he and Bond are leaving. That should be good news to some.

Extermin8or3_85d ago

It's more the fact the person incharge of AI being taking over. That's a very deliberate decision.

Profchaos85d ago

Xbox fans have wanted Phil gone for a long time he's probably the least favourite exec of all time behind matrick purely because uber his leadership he decived fans and took the Xbox brand multiplatform

badz14985d ago

Indian takeover of Microsoft

PapaBop85d ago

Considering MS's obsession with ai, this is probably a demotion for her. Still, I enjoy poking fun at Spencer but ultimately it's sad to see him go, he's made mistakes for sure but I think he genuinely cared about the Xbox brand. Sharma seems very corporate to me and certainly not the Spencer replacement Xbox fans would have hoped for.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 85d ago
Neonridr86d ago

maybe some new blood can help improve things.

Sitdown86d ago

That's not what us happening here, push for AI.

86d ago
Sonic188186d ago (Edited 86d ago )

Wow 😂 Sarah Bond is more of a surprise

86d ago Replies(7)
-Foxtrot86d ago

I'm convinced "early retirement" is just them wanting to save both themselves the embarrassment and them getting forced out without the drama.

You bow out naturally while we make it all look like it's part of the plan, both of us look as competent as we can make out during the fallout

Jim Ryan was the exactly the same.

86d ago Replies(1)
A0785d ago

“ Phil has 3 days to clean out his office?”

Why spread fake news? The press release clearly says that Phil and Sarah are staying on throughout the summer to advise the new person.

Show all comments (88)
40°

You're still overlooking this Remedy sci-fi shooter, and its 89% cheaper on Steam Deck

Before Control Resonant launches, you need to play Remedy's mind-bending Quantum Break, one of the best third-person shooters around.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com