All Channels
Popular
220°

Why Destiny Dev Dropped Peter Dinklage for Nolan North

Gamespot:

"One of the biggest surprises about the new Destiny expansion, The Taken King, is that developer Bungie has hired voice actor Nolan North to be the new voice of the in-game Ghost companion. North, who is a prolific video game voice actor known for titles like Uncharted and Assassin's Creed, hasn't been brought on just for the expansion, either; he is re-recording every line of dialogue in the entire game, completely replacing Game of Thrones actor Peter Dinklage, who was the original voice of Ghost. Dinklage's voice acting in the original game was widely criticized by fans, even after Bungie dropped his most infamous line from the game's beta test."

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
DarkOcelet3944d ago

You can replace the VA all you want but it won't be good enough if the story is crap from the the first place.

donthate3944d ago (Edited 3944d ago )

Yup!

So many empty promises Bungie repeatedly. I won't bite the second time.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!

Relientk773944d ago

But the story is amazing you just have to read all the grimore

/s

FriedGoat3944d ago

Wait, there's a story in Destiny?

I've put hundreds of hours in, can you tell me the location?

antz11043944d ago

I just pictured Jonah Hill saying that lol.

christian hour3944d ago

It's like they knew I'd stopped playing and Nolan North was the only thing to get me to replay the entire thing XD I like the reasoning they have behind this, adding more context sensitive lines of dialogue etc (what is it with Nolan North and context sensitive dialogue?).

I'm sure they would have got Dinklage back if they could, this seems more of an issue where they wanted to add more lines and have more frequent recording sessions that both clashed with his schedule and put him out of their budget range I would imagine. I didn't really have a problem with his performance, it kinda grew on me, and I miss the wizard from the moon line :(

Peace_Love_and_FPS3944d ago

Dinklage was a PR nightmare though, Bungie wouldn't touch him, and I highly doubt Peter would take the job either.

The hate he received, for his wretched performance was deserved. I love watching him, but this was garbage and so were the lines, neither party was happy with the other, how do you get that notion that Bungie WANTS dinklage if they are willing to rerecord all the lines?

3-4-53944d ago

The story is basic and generic and bland.

I like almost everything else about the game but the story......lets be real, any 2-3 of us combined could come up with a more interesting story.

* I'm honestly shocked how somebody can be a paid professional, get a nice salary, and THAT is all they can come up with????

And to add to that....Somebody approved of that story as well ?

What the heck was THAT person in charge thinking?

* For $500 million I expect a great story.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3944d ago
SaveFerris3944d ago

Having Nolan North re-recording Peter Dinklage's dialogue seems unnecessary. Couldn't they just explain the voice change as an upgrade to Ghost? Do the players get a say in keeping the original voice actor for the first part of the game or will it be patched regardless?
In any case since it is been decided, could they slip the 'Wizard' line back in for Nolan to speak it?

christian hour3944d ago

It's because he'll now be saying things that are context sensitive, so imagine it's your first time playing and dinklage is the ghost, then you decide to go loot farming and you hear nolan north comment on what you're doing. Would be pretty jarring, so they had to go back and redo everything, and I hope they took the opportunity to fix some of the poorly written or unnecessarily confusing dialogue.

Theres three reasons why they couldnt get Dinklage to just do it all, either one as likely as the other. The recording sessions will no doubt be lengthier now with all this new non-mission specific dialogue which meant they could either no longer afford Dinklage, there wasn't enough time in his ever growing schedule, or they took fan reactions to his performance to heart and did away with what some considered an ear-sore. Or maybe a bit of all three?

Phoenix763944d ago

In the dictionary under "Questification" it reads - PR BS slang meaning "thanks for being a beta tester".

Peace_Love_and_FPS3944d ago (Edited 3944d ago )

Early access tester*

We paid

Edit: on the topic of quests, here's to hoping that they add a story for the original to maybe have a better experience for TKE first timers. If they actually made it deeper and a good space epic, maybe editing some levels (how they're completed, fixing the wave formula that is still so dull).

I won't be buying TK unless it's not good or okay, maybe not even great, but F****** FANTASTIC

jokerisalive3944d ago

I am propably in the minority here but I think its a dumb move - Dinklage did ok and there are other more important apsects of the game they should be concentrating on instead of a freaking robot's voice!?!?!?!! I agree with SaveFerris above in that they should leave his lines intact and just upgrade the Ghost voice for the new expansion and leave it at that. This way it is more of an evolution of the Ghost as opposed to going back and undoing what we have become familiar with. Bonehead move I feel by the Devs.

darren_poolies3944d ago

I agree. For one I really really do not understand the hate it got/gets, I thought the voice was absoultely fine (in fact I actually quite liked it), he's voicing a robot, robots are emotionless like what do people want?

And two, it's completely unnecessar, just a waste of time and resources.

Peace_Love_and_FPS3944d ago

He had his moments ("don't do that. ")

Not sure if it was the lines but I did find the majority of his performance underwhelming

paul-p19883944d ago

You could get some of the best, most emotive actors in the world to take on this role but even they couldn't produce an amazing performance for the poor writing in Destiny. It's just a shame that the blame is being placed on the actor and not Bungie.

Tbh I kinda liked his voice, it would be weird to be without it, kinda like Keither Sutherland replacing David Hayter in MGS, but considering I won't be playing the new expansion as it's the same price as a new game I won't really notice anyway lol

Show all comments (21)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans482d ago (Edited 482d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr481d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast630d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

630d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris630d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

630d ago
anast629d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole629d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

629d ago
anast629d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 629d ago
Profchaos630d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_629d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981629d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140629d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85629d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj629d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake629d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn629d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg629d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07629d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

629d ago
Knightofelemia629d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 629d ago
Chevalier629d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom629d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac629d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake629d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark629d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde629d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125629d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)