I care about a dense world full of detail and interaction, think many others do too it's one of the reasons why Bethesda games are so great. It's not like there forgetting gameplay, quests and story but everything in the world having a purpose is pretty cool... makes the world feel more believable and real as apposed to static. You say everything you can pick up is useless but in Fallout 4 literally everything you pick up has a use like for creating 1000s of weapon mods or bases.

..you do realize that "random ***t" is actually useful?

It's incorporated into the crafting system. A globe, toy car and a microscope can be used to create a new sight for your gun etc.

I...don't see how that's possible, but making random trash things in the world actually useful is something pretty new.

Unlike Witcher 3 where...90% of everything you picked up was useless.

There are herbs everywhere in that game, but they're so cheap and the economy is so broken and easy to get rich in that you end up buying everything you need.

"So what? Theres a good reason devs don't focus on that. Because they're is no point in it. "

What ? lol. Speak for yourself.

The ability to interact with each and every item and object is one of the major features of Bethesda games. It's the backbone of any Fallout or Elder Scrolls game. "Irrelevant details" xD. That's literally what gives a Bethesda game the level of interactivity that you'd expect. It's literally what gives you the ability to do anything in the game, that you'll never be able to do in other games.

Lots of people compare Witcher 3 to Skyrim and say Skyrim was shit, but I can guarantee that a good chunk of those people would have spent more time in Skyrim than in Witcher 3. If you're talking modded Skyrim, those same people would have played Skyrim way more than TW3, and more than they will play modded TW3. Even that is because of these 'irrelevant details' - the way the game is set up lends itself so well to mods. Yes, Skyrim had a ton of issues, but that isn't the point. Comparing it to Witcher 3 is kind of stupid - apples and oranges.

"Pff, how arrogant. Your games are not the be all end all pete hines."

You must have had a bad day or something. All he said was that comparisons with other games weren't exactly sensible or fair, unless those games have the level of interaction as in a Fallout game.
This should come as no surprise after many people said the game looked dated compared to other games. What Pete is saying makes perfect sense. In their game, you can literally take apart, pick up and interact with everything. Heck, that even includes BUILDINGS now. Just about EVERYTHING is completely dynamic, which means graphics comparisons to other games are basically completely unfair.

Even other comparisons. Comparing the story, for example. Other games don't need to account for the player freedom and choice like they do, so there's a tradeoff there. Which is why Pete said "apples and oranges". Really don't know why you're having a hard time understanding this.

*Chases ZaWarudo to kick his a$$*