All Channels
Popular
110°

Analyzing Crystal Dynamics’ brilliant Tomb Raider release schedule

Crystal Dynamics' decision to spread out the release of Rise of the Tomb Raider is a brilliant move as it hits the market at all the right times on each platform. Here's why.

Read Full Story >>
eggplante.com
nX3944d ago

From a business perspective it's certainly a good move but that's also what worries me the most. If these practices where a whole fanbase is being left out on purpose turn out to be more profitable than a normal launch publishers will make timed exclusive deals on a regular basis. In my opinion, PS4 users shouldn't pay the full price for the game unless it has enough extra content to justify it.

Chanogram3944d ago

They aren't leaving out a whole fanbase. PS4 owners will get it ~1 year later, PC will get it a few months later.

It blows me away that people care THIS MUCH about a single player game, especially with so much coming out in the next 12 months.

I find it funny that PS4 owners are upset by this, but dont seem to mind that they are getting No Mans Sky before everyone else. It's easy to pick and choose which things we ignore and which upset us. I guess it's human nature, but I find it amusing.

nX3944d ago

I don't care about Tomb Raider at all, I care about the future of this industry. Timed exclusivity through marketing deals is bad no matter who's doing it, you simply missed my point.

ilikepizza3943d ago

we're nearing august and no man sky still doesnt have a release date.....

jmc88883943d ago

No what people are scratching their heads on is the fact that they are going to lose a lot of money from this, even after accounting for Microsoft's check.

Microsoft got a helluva deal. Square Enix and Crystal Dynamics got screwed, and yes, it might very well effect the series long term.

LCEvans3943d ago

JMC didnt realize you could tell the future?

freshslicepizza3943d ago

hmm, alienating consumers for a year versus alienating consumers forever like street fighter v is doing? which is the better option for consumers?

timed or full exclusives are NOT in the best interest of the consumer, they are for the hardware supplier. which is why ANY exclusive deals with third party publishers is a conflict of interest no matter what anyone says. so don't believe the pr mumbo jumbo sqaure enix says about how microsoft is able to give tomb raider a boost or how capcom needs sony to make another street fighter. it's all pr done to coarse fans to certain hardware.

and they are doing a remarkable job because here we are on the forums and do you see xbox and playstation fans getting along any more than they did before?

wake up people, exclusives are to exclude others.

jb2273942d ago

The Know (not always the best source for rumors but at least half of this one has panned out) reported on the 1 year exclusivity a few weeks ago & they claimed that to make up for the tardiness that the game will be priced at 40$ on PS4. Which means after I wait for a used copy (won't buy it new out of principle) I'll be able to play it for around 25 bucks. Would've been a day one retail purchaser this holiday but CD done burnt us ps4 fans so never again.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3942d ago
Lamboomington3943d ago

"PS4 users shouldn't pay the full price for the game unless it has enough extra content to justify it."

Why does it need extra content to justify the cost ? The full game doesn't justify the cost because it came out earlier on an entirely different platform ?

lol, some flawless reasoning right there.

The PS4 version will probably have added content and all, and that's a great bonus, but what you said still makes no sense. If the PS4 version is done well, then why on earth would it not be worth full price ?

nX3943d ago

To show that you are not bending over to anti-consumer marketing deals and you are willing to vote with your wallet if necessary? While PS4 users will have to pay 60$ at launch the game will be outdated and available for half the price on other platforms, I don't know about you but I don't enjoy getting screwed over by company executives. Seems like you completely missed my point as well.

Lamboomington3943d ago (Edited 3943d ago )

@nX

'to show that you are not bending over to anti consumer marketing deals'

how is this anti consumer ? This is a normal business deal. You get the game late, so what ? I really don't understand. I'm on PC, and I couldn't give a damn if it comes late. As long as we get a good version that makes use of the platform, what on earth is the issue ?

' the game will be outdated and available for half the price on other platforms'

game being outdated ? that is such a non issue, like I said previously. So what if it's dated on OTHER platforms ? How is that relevant ? It's not like this is 5 years later.

So what if it's half price on other platforms ? Who cares ? How is that relevant to your PS4 version. If they spend the time and effort to make a good PS4 version, how does that not justify a $60 purchase ??

Again, are people that impatient ? Do you also not realize that the timed exclusivity deal objectively means a better XBOX version, a better PS4 version and a better PC version than otherwise ? It will look way better on each console because of focusing on either one exclusively.

When GTA 5 came out for PC 2 years later, was it anti consumer for them to charge $60 ? Even if they didn't completely revamp it and it was less of an overhaul, would you be saying the same thing for them ? No, it would be expected to cost the full price. It's common sense.

You want to know what an anti-consumer deal is ? Sony's exclusive Scarecrow missions for Arkham Knight on PS4. I really like the PS4 and it's exclusives, and Sony is winning this gen by a MILE, but it was cringeworthy to see that play out every 10 minutes at their E3.

Guy on stage : "Hey we locked off content permanently for multiplats for everyone else, because money"

Crowd: "Yaaaaay!!!"

(Not to say MS didn't try to do the same, but they are losing in that respect too, so it wasn't nearly as omnipresent as it was during Sony's conference)

jb2273942d ago

Maybe because it'll be a cross gen title released 3 years into the next gen cycle? It's gonna be absolutely trounced by everything else in the visuals & gameplay department by the time the ps4 version rolls aroun.

OB1Biker3943d ago (Edited 3943d ago )

'A brilliant move as it hits the market at all the right times...'
That had me scratch my head XD
Edit: the deal is what it is not arguing about it but saying that it hits the market at all the right times sounds really silly. I'm sure many xbox fans will also agree even if like me they probably don't care that much about 'the market'

jmc88883943d ago (Edited 3943d ago )

What?

So... not being able to collect money from up to 70 percent of potential buyers for anywhere from 6-12 months is a good idea?

So instead of getting AHEAD of Uncharted 4, it now is going to ask for $60 for a year old game when Uncharted 4 will have been out for 6 months itself, thereby able to undercut it with $30-40 sales at launch (and through the holiday season) is good? On the PS4 of all consoles? Who is the average PS4 user going to choose? Uncharted or Tomb Raider?

That's like saying what average XB1 user going to choose between Halo and say MGS: TPP. Gee I wonder which is going to be chosen more.

That even the date it is launching it is going up against Fallout 4 is good?

...and if you assume people with PS4's are going to enjoy paying full price for that year old game is a problem, and it WILL be for MANY, then to bring them on board one would think you would need to lower the price... which means instead of selling it to the vast majority of potential buyers at full price this year, it would be better to sell it for LESS in order to ATTEMPT to garner SIMILAR sales a year later is good? Oh yeah, and with Steam sales, PS4 users are going to see discounts on both the PC AND the XB1 version, and wonder why are they paying $60 when other versions are going for as low as $10-15 and feel confident they are making a good purchase? Seriously look at how quickly Tomb Raider was discounted sub $20 on PC.

Sheer brilliance? More like absolute incompetence.

People can spin and spin and spin until they are dizzy, but there is no way in hell they'll make nearly as much money with the idiotic decision they made.

They got a check from Microsoft, but they are LOSING money on the deal... BOTH in terms of TOTAL money received, but ALSO the fact that a good portion of that money won't be in their bank accounts THIS year, but NEXT year. It's a simple concept, time value of money.

Wow, simply wow.

3943d ago
Lamboomington3943d ago

The timed exclusivity means a better game on each platform. I hope people realize this. As a PC gamer, I'm happy about this.

PS4 owners should be happy too. They'll get a game that takes advantage of their system.

ifinitygamer3943d ago

Your idea that people would choose Uncharted against Tomb Raider is absolutely correct. That is why it makes sense to release Tomb Raider on PC during that time for people who want their fix of an action adventure game like that but don't want to buy a PS4 at that time. Then, later that year, when the Uncharted hype has died down a bit, the PS4 version of Tomb Raider comes out. No one is saying TR could effectively knock off Uncharted, so this is the smartest way to combat against it.

AstroCyborg3943d ago

screwing over you fanbase for cash is retarded not brilliant

Lamboomington3943d ago (Edited 3943d ago )

How is it screwing over a fanbase ? I don't understand - why is it a big deal if you get a game late ? You're still getting it, not to mention that it will almost definitely be much better on your platform than if it was released along with other platforms.

When the PS4 and PC versions finally come out, they will be epic for each platform. They'll run well and take advantage of hardware.

What difference does it make if you get it late ? Are people that impatient ? As a PC gamer, a late PC version only makes me happy, because I know that it means better quality for the platform, rather than a ported mess. The same applies to the PS4, albeit in a slightly different way. It's going to run better and look better on PS4 as a result of it releasing 1 year later.

3943d ago
Lamboomington3943d ago

That's whining about non issues.

"It belonged to PS nation"

Good Lord, if you get the game 12 months late, but it's a fully fleshed out PS4 version that takes advantage of the hardware, who cares ?

Sorry, but all the things you stated are non issues. Have to do with fans perception of what belongs to PlayStation, and nothing to do with the actual game

3943d ago
Show all comments (25)
130°

Metacritic's 2026 Game Publisher Rankings

Jason Dietz: "We reveal the past year's best and worst video game publishers (based on their 2025 releases) in the 16th edition of our annual Game Publisher Rankings."

Read Full Story >>
metacritic.com
Christopher51d ago

Take note, Sony, you're falling behind by a lot.

-Foxtrot51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

I was just going to say this, their biggest and top rated game here is TLOU2 for PC….it’s embarrassing.

Even Ubisoft and EA are ahead

Kind of surprised Nintendo is pretty low aswell, their biggest game is also a rerelease with the Switch 2 version of TotK.

StoneColdCrazy50d ago

That’s what happens when you start shutting down your own studios and forget what actually made you matter in the industry in the first place. Sony used to set the standard — now it feels like they’ve lost that identity. And if they decide to walk away from the PC market too, that’s going to be another huge mistake — that platform is only growing, and ignoring it now would just put them even further behind.

1Victor50d ago

@christopher:” Take note, Sony, you're falling behind by a lot.”
.
Why single out Sony? Microsoft didn’t do any better than the year before 5th same as Sony 9th and they have acquired activision and other mayor titles that have boosted their score massively from a 9th and Sony a 4th the year before the acquisitions.
Sony does need to do better without a doubt and I do hope they do take note but not the note of buying publishers is the way to succeed.

Christopher50d ago

1. Microsoft didn't get worse.
2. Sony got way worse.
3. Because Sony needs the criticism the most considering their publishing output this generation has been propped up by last gen ports and third-party developers for the most part.

50d ago
thesoftware73050d ago

1Victor,

I don't wanna speak for Christopher, but like most of us we recognize that Sony's output this Gen has been way below their own standards.

Also Sony did buy a fair amount of Devs, I know you will say they were not publishers, and don't compare in size, but they had their fair share of Aquisitions, including the very well established Bungie.

The overall point is with their stellar first party track record of the past, they should not be going down, they are singled out because they are some of the best videogame devs/publisher on the planet...no matter what reasons we attribute to the situation, they are moving in the wrong direction... period.

50d ago
KyRo50d ago

Its widely accept that Sony this generation has been underwhelming. We've had more peripheral releases, controller variants, PS5 accessories than games it feels like. The exclusives were also PS4 and what little output they have put exclusively on PS5 is nowhere near as memorable as what came in every generation before that.

This isn't a Sony hate post but anyone who's older and has been around for a long time gaming will agree that PS5 is by far Sony's worst generation. As much as Xbox is in the gutter, I pray the do bounce back in the hope we get Sony to wake up again.

darthv7249d ago (Edited 49d ago )

If you want to critique MS... you are doing so towards their management. The games output and their hardware have been much better than PS this gen. Sadly... people still hold a grudge against XB because of MS. Thankfully i am not that petty... I've been enjoying their games output in the drought of PS. And add in some NS1/2 games as well to balance things out. Things will change for me once Wolverine hits, and I start using my 5 more. That one I'm looking forward to. And the Marvel fighter... I'm not a GTA player so that has no bearing on my view of things.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 49d ago
Profchaos50d ago

Big part of that has been the live service push resulting in cancellation or flop after flop but when they put out the games their fans want we get amazing stuff like astro bot

Leadership really screwed the pooch trend chasing

1Victor50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

https://www.metacritic.com/...

https://www.metacritic.com/...
Well I apologize I was wrong about not doing worse but my statement of Microsoft getting a boost still stand 🤷🏿

50d ago
1Victor50d ago

Well OBSCURED unlike you I’m honorable enough to recognize when I’m wrong and apologize.
.
@ The software you know there’s no comparison between what Microsoft acquired and what Sony acquired that’s why you tried to get ahead of the conversation, yes we all know Sony can do better than what they have done this gen but they inhaled the poison GAS they thought would bring money for years but we make sure they got the message and quite a few games got cancelled you know as well a hit like that take years to be corrected and by now they hopefully will have taken steps away from the GAS and slowed their approach to them.

bsingle4050d ago

You will say anything when you are in denial that your hardware is dead and nobody wants your platform. Good luck with Helix because nobody will buy it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 49d ago
SimulationDaily51d ago

But... but... the garbage-mongers always tell us that Square Enix is in trouble! 😂

Christopher51d ago

Square doesn't help that it fear mongers itself with ridiculous 'goals' that they can't reach and then they proclaim failure if they don't reach it. They're quite freaking profitable and people act like they're dying.

SimulationDaily51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Keep in mind that these "proclamations" are usually third-hand bad translations from somedude who was at the investor conference, posted on Twitter, and picked up by press and youtubers like they were gold, and then when the official translation comes out, they're much softer statements, but at that point, the damage is done.

gold_drake50d ago

to be very fair

being number one on these things does not indicate how "well" their games do selling wise.

51d ago
50d ago
50d ago
Show all comments (39)
40°

Embracer studio Crystal Dynamics continues steady stream of layoffs

The Tomb Raider developer said the cuts will impact development personnel and operations staff.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com