All Channels
Popular
200°

Digital v Physical

Xbox Players take on the age old view of digital v Physical, Over the last 5 years the games industry and we as users have been party to a change in how software is being delivered to us.

Read Full Story >>
xboxplayers.com
Relientk773968d ago

Physical, and I will always buy physical as long as games are available on disc

ShottyatLaw3968d ago (Edited 3968d ago )

I am 50-50. Obviously PSN and XBL indie titles are digital, but for certain titles I want day one, and I know I will keep for the life of the console, I will go digital. MCC and soon Uncharted Collection are great examples. Those are things you just like to have a click away on your console.

I just really wish someone would take the initiative and really give me more of a reason to go completely digital. I don't think it's hard -- how about early release + $49.99 price point for major titles? Games releasing on Tuesdays in the U.S. is just dumb. Why not provide digital early releases on the Friday before street dates with a small discount for not needing to pay the retailer their cut?

As much as I love the convenience, and I do take advantage of good sales here and there, they just don't give enough incentive to fully commit like we did on PC.

bmwfanatic3967d ago

I agree with what you say about incentives to buy digital. However at this point un the industry thats not gonna happen. The brick and mortar stores would be up in arms (gamestop Wal-Mart target best buy etc) and lose alot of money. Until the physical stores can offer the same incentives I dont see digital console prices going down.

freshslicepizza3967d ago

consumers feel more sense of ownership with physical but digital offers more convenience.

medman3967d ago (Edited 3967d ago )

Digital is a great convenience, but nothing beats having a physical copy of a game in your hand. Electronics can and do fail, or get corrupted, or Sony and Microsoft could get hacked, losing your data in the process...anything is possible. So for me, digital will never be as secure as having your own copy to do with as your please, whenever you please...including trading, letting friends borrow and borrowing friends games in return (though the stellar ps shareplay is taking care of that for me currently), buying physical used copies for cheaper than their digital counterparts, etc. etc. etc.

My games are delivered via mail on the same day they release, so the only real "downside" of having a physical copy is actually having to get up and put a disk in the console, which is a nothing factor for me. If having to get up to change a disk is too much for you to handle, you may want to put the controller down have a good long look in the mirror....

Until digital offers the incentive to purchase by having the lower pricing, there is literally no upside to digital for me personally. None.

4Sh0w3967d ago (Edited 3967d ago )

Digital all the way.

Started with both physical and digital last gen but now that Iam all digital this gen I can't fathom bothering with a physical disc.

Some folks say "well what happens when your internet goess down?"...all I know is I live in southern Cali, most my family lives in Virginia, friends are all over US and I dont know anyone whos internet has been down for more than a day, personally I cant even remember when mine hasnt been working for more than 30min, definitely been years ago.

I just like my library being in one place, play any game no disc, no going to gamestop, predownloads so game is ready at midnight if I want to play, switching from game to game is so convenient, no worries of scratching discs, and no worry of disc drive wearing out prematurely AND most of all GAME SHARING is super easy and has saved me hundreds of $$$ this gen with my 2 nephews having acces to my whole library of games. 😉

The digital sales trend on consoles is rising every year, on PC its already over 92% digital. I dont sell my games to gamestop so the used market never paid off for me but if they make digital cheaper that would just be the icing on the cake.

BeefCurtains3967d ago

I am all about the physical.

Digital is going nowhere unfortunately. It is higher profitability, no more reselling of games at GameStop. And last but not least, consider this: my X1 stopped working last month. Out of frustration I wanted to get it fixed and trade it in to gamestop for a PS4. Why didn't i? Because of all the digital content I was going to lose that I couldn't sell for PS4 games.

No more digital purchases for me.

ShinMaster3967d ago (Edited 3967d ago )

I only buy cheaper games digitally.

My Wind Waker HD Wii U bundle did not come with a physical copy of the game. It was digital and I was severely disappointed.

All digital would have been great 2 generations ago when games were not 40GB in size.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3967d ago
Gazondaily3968d ago

All my games except one are digital. I never thought I'd jump on the digital bandwagon so strongly but its happened. With account sharing, it just makes sense.

krouse933967d ago

Same, the only Physical game I have is Destiny because it came with my White PS4...

I just prefer the convenience of the Digital games.

lvl_headed_gmr3968d ago

I am done with physical. This gen is all digital for me.

Physical is a dying format.

Live in the past, get left behind.

paul-p19883967d ago

This gen, on both my Vita and PS4, I've gone all digital except for imports (it's just a pain getting Japanese games on PSN, and the mark up on credit is ABSURD!!)

I remote play quite a lot, and it just wouldn't make sense doing so with an all physical collection. I prefer the convenience as well, no need to clutter my cupboards with games, and if you are clever with how u buy the games they tend to be the same price or slightly more than physical e.g. I've just pre-ordered MGS5 PS4 for £44 by buying cheap PSN credit, less than most retailers, and after using cashback on online shopping I've accrued for quite some time it's not going to cost me a penny :D

sanosukegtr1233967d ago

sometime digital because i carry around my ps3 most of the time but physical is good. But i like digital cuz you can get deals on them in the psn store.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3967d ago
dodgeuk193968d ago

I was pro physical games but i don't trade in, i felt insulted when offered 1/8 of the price of a game to see them back on the shelf for such a high price i.e. New game £39.99 pre-owned £34.99

Bigpappy3968d ago

I like having the option for those who want physical. But I have moved on. I don't have time or the desire to go to the store and stand in line to find that they are out of stock. I don't want to store disk and swap them in and out either.

I do understand that disk can have better value. I have no resentment for E.A making a nice profit. As long is they aren't misleading their customer, they could make a Zillion. Doesn't affect me in the least.

UltraNova3967d ago

The more money EA and the like make on digital the less inclined they'll feel to drop prices. In other words yes, it does affect you. Unless money is of no concern to you.

lvl_headed_gmr3967d ago

Actually, the more consumers buy digital and less physical the sooner prices will drop.

We are already seeing EAaaccess offer amazing value to their subscribers and its digital.

Sony offers savings with PS+ and MS have their huge sales week that just passed.

Digital prices for launch titles are equal to their retail version because companies want parity with pricing. If there were no physical copies sold at retail, digital would be much cheaper cause companies wouldn't need parity with physical retail versions then.

UltraNova3967d ago

Allow me to disagree.

Digital has been around for ages and we have yet to see any significant price drops while eliminating part of the competition(in this case physical copies that get discounted the more they stay on store shelves) would only mean there's one less reason for publishers to lower digital prices.

medman3967d ago

@abigpappy
I guess this guy has never heard of same day delivery of games via the internets.....yikes.

xboxpete3967d ago (Edited 3967d ago )

personally i have changed quite a bit on this i was always for physical however as i look at my ever growing boxed tower i find it silly to keep building towers of games i will never trade in....

on the other hand there are certain games that will always tempt me to try out and this is where digital fails.

im for digital if its a title ill keep for my collection but there is room for both

XSpike3967d ago

Switched to Digital last gen when the PStore started adding all new releases to the store due to game sharing. Only buy physical on the odd game, but since discs all have to be installed to the HDD makes even less reason to buy physical

Show all comments (50)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio23d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing23d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit23d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing23d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
26d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted26d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8526d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele25d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk25d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay25d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 25d ago
Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit25d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg25d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10125d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14925d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay25d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn226d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn225d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown25d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay25d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay25d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac25d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger26d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300026d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde26d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde25d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)