All Channels
Popular
170°

Should Microsoft Enter The Handheld Gaming Realm In Force With Windows 10?

Will Windows 10 finally be the ultimate entrance into the handheld gaming realm for Microsoft?

Read Full Story >>
thetechzealot.com
TXIDarkAvenger3977d ago

Now would be the best time do get in the game.

W10 will be on phones, tablets, PCs, and on the Xbox One. A device similar to the Nvidia Shield Portable could be pretty great for Microsoft.

Maybay3977d ago

Yeah, Nvidia Shield is ace.

mikeslemonade3977d ago

The people don't want mobile. Don't get in!

ABizzel13977d ago

The Shield tablet is better, which is why a tablet is the route to go. Handhelds are over for everyone except Nintendo, who has 2 - 3 more gens tops.

Maltaze3977d ago

Think Shield was a great device, they just aimed too high at a very small audience. Microsoft on the other hand has the infrastructure and money to make this happen in a heartbeat. I would actually be surprised if they dont corner their most lucrative market this time around.

SteamPowered3977d ago

Ive rocked my Shield Portable for about 2 years now. Unbelievable piece of kit.

The Shield would be the pinnacle of handhelds for Microsoft to achieve.

ABizzel13977d ago (Edited 3977d ago )

It would be a horrible idea, if anything Surface is all they need if they can get a cheaper version and market it right as an Xbox tablet with controls, just like Sony should do a PlayStation Tablet. It's bigger, can hold a better battery life, have a bigger and screen, and better tech.

Handheld gaming for the core gamer is dead, outside of Nintendo. No dev wants to spend a AAA budget on a handheld game that at best sells 1m copies when they can make that game on console and sell 1m units per console.

Leave it to Nintendo, and Sony and MS should simply make companion devices for their consoles that can stream games anywhere cross-play certain games. Dedicated handhelds are dead for the core. (Nintendo handhelds are core, but they have a stable of franchises that support it, as well as most of JP, and kid gamers). For everyone a smartphone or tablet is just as good.

Making a dedicated handheld means splitting MS dev teams between 2 platforms and they already have the least amount of devs of the Big 3.

TXIDarkAvenger3977d ago

An Xbox tablet with controls is pretty much an Nvidia Shield Tablet. The Nvidia Shield portable also has a better battery life.

I feel like you don't know what an Nivida Shield is. No dev has to spend money to develop exclusively for it. The idea is to be able to stream Xbox One and PC games to the device. On top of that, it can run emulators too.

In a sense, it would be a companion to not only the Xbox One but also PC.

ABizzel13977d ago

@TXIDarkAvenger

I'm one of the most informed here. The Shield is NVIDIA 'sattempt at a handheld featuring Tegra 4, the tablet was the second device with Tegra K1, The Shield TV (their micro-console) features the X1.

The reason the Shield had a better battery life is because it uses a much weaker processor (nearly 3x - 4x weaker for the GPU computations), has a lower resolution screen, a smaller screen, and has a dimmer screen.

Which is exactly why I said they stick with a tablet interface, like Surface / Shield Tablet / PS Tablet, because it's something they already know how to make, and can offers much better performance due to it's form factor, and a much needed bigger screen for gaming.

Literally taken from my post above:

"Sony and MS should simply make companion devices for their consoles that can stream games anywhere cross-play certain games."

The Vita is already the concept you're talking about, and it's failing, the shield as well. A tablet is an easy sell, because it's already known, a form factor consumers are use to, and has a bigger screen for gaming.

But all that is for not as with the Vita if there aren't exclusive to support the system. It's what drives Nintendo's handhelds with games like Pokemon, Monster Hunter, Mario Kart, Yokai Watch, etc...

Developing an exclusive for Vita on par with games like Uncharted Golden Abyss and Killzone, were nearly 1/3 the price of a full PS3 game and team (Straight from Sony), which is too much for devs to focus on with a game that at most will sell 1m copies.

At this point mobile technology is up there with the PS360Wii U, and respectively speaking games that push that hardware will cost nearly as much as those retail games.

And once again everything you mentioned Surface already does (PC streaming, and soon XBO streaming). So once again a cheaper, but still capable version of Surface with controls is the way to go, not a handheld. Leave that to Nintendo.

TXIDarkAvenger3977d ago (Edited 3977d ago )

I get what you're saying but I'd personally want a portable over a tablet due to its size along with a controller attached to the screen.

The Nvidia Shield portable is the same price as the starting price for Surface 3. If its possible to make a smaller device like Shield portable at a cheaper price, sounds like a product I'd be interested in. Again, I'm just speaking for myself. Might as well use my laptop over a tablet with better specs with the same portability.

Bigpappy3977d ago

They already have phones and tablets, and have already shown games running on Surface pro using Win10. So this article is pointless.

ABizzel13977d ago

Someone who gets it. Everything this article and people in here are saying is already done on a Surface Pro (PC streaming, XBO streaming coming soon, and HDMI), educate yourselves people before speaking.

There is no point in a handheld when MS's tablet already does all of this, simply make a entry level model of it, and rebrand it Xbox Tablet.

Just like Sony needs to do to their handheld line if they want to continue with it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3977d ago
warrior823977d ago

they should resurrect the game gear since the original xbox felt like dreamcast 2

MCTJim3977d ago

I have two of them :D I bought them off ebay with like 30 games for 10 bucks each. Boy oh boy do they eat batteries too. You need to be a wall hugger to use this device.

OC_MurphysLaw3977d ago

Why would they do this? They have Surface Pro, they have windows 10 phones...there is 100% no reason they should entertain handheld gaming specific devices at this point.

vongruetz3977d ago

Microsoft doesn't even want to make phones... why would they make a handheld console?

That said, yes they should.

LifeInNZ3977d ago (Edited 3977d ago )

Given their recent layoffs from last years acquisiton of Nokia I'm not sure where they will be taking their W10 platform on mobiles. The Surface is doing well but thats not priced at the general consumer. Lets also not forget their other mobile trainwreck that was the Zune.

To be honest, I would love it if MS had an ace up its sleeve like being able to easily install W10 on Android devices. Pair a controller with a modern tablet and you have a pretty damned good mobile gaming platform. Just need a service like XBox to start bringing more console style games!

I suppose since they have released Smartglass and Office apps on Android they might just release an XBox app for phones/tablets which gives access to the Xbox Store and Network....maybe?

Fro_xoxo3977d ago (Edited 3977d ago )

nawh.. nintendo runs that space. . not even sony could compete with the 3DS, let a lone Microsoft ^_^.

I like their focus on XO.
No point producing another platform only to neglect it like Sony did to the Vita.

Show all comments (31)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio29d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing29d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9229d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit29d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing29d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9229d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
32d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted32d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8532d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele31d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk31d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay31d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Athlon10132d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit31d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg31d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10131d ago (Edited 31d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14931d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay31d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn232d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn231d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown32d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay31d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay31d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac31d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger32d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300032d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde32d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde31d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)