All Channels
Popular
180°

This Star Fox Screenshot Will Blow Your Mind

N247 writes: Quite honestly, Nintendo’s E3 2015 reveal of Star Fox Zero for the Wii U left a lot to desire. While the game looked nice, it’s nothing close to what we anticipated the game would look like , especially considering the fact that the game is being co-developed by PlatinumGames, known for their fast actioned top notch graphic quality games such as the Bayonetta series.

Read Full Story >>
nintendo247.com
Naga3969d ago

It's a shame it's not real.

Iceman_Nightmare3969d ago

Wii U couldnt handle these graphics, and if NX is weaker than the PS4 the same story will repeat. Lack of third parties support. and the console will die just like Wii U

Peace_Love_and_FPS3969d ago

NX is "supposedly" weaker. According to an insider. Suuuuuuuuuuure.

If it's true then Nintendo has lost their minds

Kingthrash3603969d ago

@peace
Can't see why it would be a suprize if it were weaker...they did just make the wiiu, and the wii before that, and the GameCube before that all under powered systems. Nintendo has already lost their minds...we are hoping they snap out of it at this point

jholden32493969d ago

@Iceman_Nightmare

There will be a lack of third-party support regardless of power. The reason they didn't care about making a powerful system is because they knew the third parties wouldn't bring their games anyways, because NO ONE BUYS THEM.

And I'm sure the console will die, but not before 5 good years on the market and an armada of great games to play

ShinMaster3969d ago

The Wii U is just as powerful, if not more powerful than, PS3/360.

That said, this is NOT a screenshot. It's fake.

LOL_WUT3969d ago

Sweet screenshot now thats what Nintendo should've aimed for. I'm all for nostalgia but to purposely downgrade your game (StarFox zero) is mind boggling ;)

GhostTurtle3969d ago

@Kingthrash360

GC underpowered? lmao

FamilyGuy3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

The site is pathetic, they really just made a story off of a single, fan-created, picture of a game? How pointless is this? This is spam

Sono4213969d ago

@KingThrash uhhhh I think you're confused? Gamecube was the strongest system that gen...

DC7773969d ago

Not good enough for what Wii U can handle. If you disagree you never owned Need For Speed or AC3 or 4 on Wii U.

Shame on Nintendo for that N64 trash they showed at e3.

alabtrosMyster3968d ago

@jholden3249 a lot of people seem to repeat the same line of argumentsyou do:

1 - There is no point in Nintendo making a powerful console (the first Wii did great!!) they just need the right gimmick...

2 - Third parties just hate Nintendo and will never do business with them because reasons...

Responses:
1 - Strong(ish) hardware would bring in third parties , this is a Nintendo console, many will at the very least test the waters if there is a bit install base, especially if it proves able to attract some "core" gamers... which comes with the strong hardware!

2 - See the first response, it all goes in together, third parties did release games early on the Wii U, even some "AAA" ports, however because the hardware is shitty it performed worse than the old consoles... this discouraged me and many from buying Nintendo hardware, nobody wanted worse versions of existing games + a new Mario game...

What happened is pretty clear, this is not a conspiracy against Nintendo, the Wii U is just a badly designed system.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3968d ago
DragoonsScaleLegends3969d ago

Did they really just say they expected the game to look as good as the Bayonetta series when that game doesn't look amazing either lol. Star Fox looks just as good as Bayonetta on Wii U. Of course it just looks like a Xbox 360 or PS3 game as far as graphics if we are talking about the scenery but what do you expect? That screenshot looks like a PC game. Actually it doesn't even look like video game graphics just nice artwork which is what it is.

Metallox3969d ago

"Star Fox looks just as good as Bayonetta on Wii U".

No, the difference here is that Bayonetta has impressive aesthetics, especially the sequel.

http://images.nintendolife....

What is this, anyway? It looks like a simple polygon that attacks the player, it's so uninspired.

Same for the enemies:

http://atomix.vg/wp-content...

And, well, like I said, Bayonetta 2 at least looks good to the eye, doesn't matter if its graphics aren't impressive.

http://www.nintendo.fi/wiiu...

http://assets2.vice.com/ima...

deathtok3969d ago

It's not that much effort to click the link, you know.

GamingTruth3969d ago

what pc game? you pc nerds love saying crap like that, when theres nothing on your precious pcs that look like any of these exclusives from other platforms

ShinMaster3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

Are you saying the Star Fox with Bayonetta 2 visuals doesn't look any better than what they showed this E3?

Bayonetta 2 Star Fox easter egg: http://i.imgur.com/960TBvt....

The problem is that Zero doesn't even look as good as a PS3 or 360 game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3969d ago
Cy3969d ago

I don't care how nice it looks unless they give us better controls.

wonderfulmonkeyman3969d ago

Thank you.
Finally, someone who points out a legit complaint instead of waffling about graphics like so many sparkle-loving sheep these days do.

The control scheme sounds wonky: they need to allow full controller customization, or at least feasible alternative schemes to select, to help this game take off with fans.
We're used to our face buttons doing the shooting.
Let us decide that.

Cy3969d ago

I can still remember a time when people whining about graphics over gameplay would be laughed out of whatever forum or comments section they were in. Personally I blame the platform "wars" (can't even say console, because PC people are the worst with this in my experience) because pretty graphics are an easy and shallow way to "prove" your system of choice is "better".

Vegamyster3969d ago

The game as far as I've see does support the classic controls. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Blastoise3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

The awful graphics and half arsed design are entirely legitimate complaints.

Don't pretend that everybody complaining is some kind of graphics whore who is expecting it to look like Crysis, it just looks really rough

wonderfulmonkeyman3969d ago

If you honestly think that's what rough graphics look like, Blast, then you've never owned a PS2, let alone some of the worst Gamecube games.

The graphics issue for SFZ is being blown up into a bigger issue than it actually is.
That's a fact.
It's not so horrible that it deserves to be dismissed for it's graphics alone.
Yet that's precisely what people here are doing.
If that's not being a bunch of sparkle-worshipping graphics whores, nothing is.

BVFTW3969d ago

Being honest I'm interested in the game and if the gameplay is as good as the other Star Fox games I'm all in but I'm convinced that they can do better with the looks (Nintendo said it was on purpose so the Wii U can definitely do better). The Star Fox series, since its foundation, was a graphical showpiece of non stop action, it introduced 3d gaming done right on the SNES thanks to Argonaut's SFX chip, Star Fox 64 was also a showcase for the N64, featuring prominently in promotions (remember the tapes XD), plus it introduced a new hardware feature like Rumble and had something that Nintendo games usually lack... awesome voice acting (the 3Ds remaster messed with these, is still a good version nonetheless). The new game should have a cutting edge feel to give the franchise justice, even so I have no doubt the gameplay will be top notch, Do a barrel roll!

Bimkoblerutso3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

@wonderfulmonkeyman

Obviously the game doesn't push polys like the bigger AAA games out there, but I think the real problem is how bland it's art style is. It is literally like they took the N64 game and re-textured it. Not every game has to be another Uncharted, but I don't find it ridiculous at all for people to expect new games to look more interesting (poly count aside) than games that came out nearly 20 years ago.

Ipunchbabiesforfun3969d ago

@monkey

All I've gotten from your posts is you hate 12 year old girls who like Twilight.

fanboysmackdown3969d ago

Being a Nintendo wanker fanboy is fine but to be a blind wanker fanboy who wanks sparkly sheep is just too over the top. And back to the subject, Starfox is the most laughably ugly PS1 looking game I've ever seen.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3969d ago
Starbucks_Fan3969d ago

"This is what StarFox Zero Should’ve Looked like"

mushroomwig3969d ago

That would have been a better title as it's not actually a screenshot, it's concept.

oasdada3969d ago

lol was about the write that

BrandanT3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

Not only are the textures flat, but the art direction is terrible.
It really feels off. The Nintendo I knew really changed this year. Nintendo made so many better looking games than this,
I just don't love them as much after this e3. They let met me down.

OhMyGandhi3969d ago

I've got my expansion pak and I'm ready to go!

aerisbueller3969d ago

Yeah, seriously. Upon closer inspection you can see the poly count is too high, but if I had seen that with a caption saying n64, I would have totally fallen for it.

jcnba283969d ago

No that's just a low quality screenshot. What we really get is this: http://i.imgur.com/LqJTVHX....

3969d ago
Show all comments (85)
60°

Random: Takaya Imamura Ponders The Possibility Of Star Fox Zero On 'Switch 2'

Takaya Imamura, famed ex-Nintendo developer known for his work on the F-Zero and Star Fox franchises, has taken to social media to ponder the possibility of a Star Fox Zero release on Nintendo's upcoming 'Switch 2'.

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com
Knightofelemia560d ago (Edited 560d ago )

It's a good ponder. Nintendo would be stupid to not do it. The more titles and first party line up released on the Switch 2 the more enticed the customer will be.

120°

Star Fox Zero, Was it Really That Bad?

Has time been kind to Star Fox Zero? Does the game have any redeeming qualities that are worthy of revisiting? Should it be considered for a port to the Switch? Was it really that bad?

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
Snookies121659d ago

Haven't played it since it came out, but I really enjoyed it. Can't tell if that's just nostalgia-tinted glasses, or if I actually consider it a good game though lol.

Vits1659d ago

It's a mediocre game that reuses ideas, scenarios, characters and moments from previous ones. Paired with one of the worst control methods that I had the displeasure of using.

CptDville1658d ago

Those controls. Boring and frustrating at the same time. Only with co-op they were bearable, but co-op was restricted to finished levels.

SeTTriP1658d ago

Yes couldn't finish it it was so boring.

MissAubrey1658d ago

controls made me stop playing also what good is a 65inch tv when you have to look at a tiny Wiiu tablet.. same with kirby & the rainbow curse..

Einhander19711658d ago

No it was great, just the control scheme spoilt things really. The wii u screen was not needed for it really

Show all comments (10)
100°

Platinum wants to bring Star Fox Zero to Switch

But any potential design changes would be up to Nintendo if it happens.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
FallenAngel19841708d ago

I’d rather Star Fox Assault be brought to Switch with online multiplayer instead

Teflon021708d ago

Finally, someone who knows about Assault. Best Star Fox Multi-player imo.

Neonridr1708d ago

or a Star Fox 64 remaster instead.

deadfrag1708d ago

Platinum Games wants to many things but sadly it does not show nothing new for years!They try to jump on all offers but end finishing none!

whitbyfox1708d ago

1: Get rid of the motion controls.

2: Bring us Okami 3.

Good-Smurf1708d ago (Edited 1708d ago )

I rather have them show more of Bayonetta 3 first before they talking about any new project.
This reeks Inafune's funding for Red Ash and Mighty No.9 animated series, both never materialized.