260°

Ex-Planetside 2 Developer Throws Epic Shade at Destiny

Planetside 2 is out, and one developer decided to announce it with some epic shade throwing.

ThichQuangDuck3895d ago

Appears everyone is throwing shade at Destiny today. We can all admit that shooting gameplay in it feels amazing,but the game itself is tedious with little to no story

Griever3895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

The gameplay and addiction for loot is crazy in Destiny. I played it for 3 months but when it came to paying up for the DLC, I quit. It was just too expensive for more of the same. The Taken King is ripping off people at a whole another level given the meager content they are offering. I just bought the expansion for FFXIV for $40 and the amount of new content is mind-boggling. A whole new open world continent to explore, a new race, three new sub-classes, tens of hours of story quests, numerous sidequests, several superbosses, multiple raids, huge amount of new gear and much more. Bungie are just ripping off people with the hefty DLC prices. I wonder how good Planetside 2 is. I think I will give it a try. Have been looking for a good FPS on PS4.

ThichQuangDuck3895d ago

Ha let me know when you find a good fps on PS4. I am waiting on Rainbow Six. This is one of Sony's deficits multiplayer games so they have third party exclusive dlc. i miss Socom, Timesplitters and Syphon Filter

JWiLL5523895d ago

15 campaign missions, 6 strikes, 6-8 PVP maps, 2 PVP modes, 3 subclasses, a 6 man raid and hundreds of weapons and armor is meager content?

Vanilla Destiny was weak but come on, compared to the DLC practices we've seen in games like Evolve and Mortal Kombat ($30 for a character and some skins) this isn't bad at all.

I'm not excusing the stupid collectors edition pricing but people are going to far here. $40 isn't a ton of money for something that can give dozens of hours of play, hundreds for others.

HammadTheBeast3895d ago

^

Weapon and Armor should've been free, as with any MMO just like Destiny is trying to be, the campaign missions all play the same, strikes are good, PVP maps may or may not be good, 2 new modes is whatever, and all in all, this isn't even half the content of the vanilla game but it's asking for nearly the same price.

Johnsonparts233895d ago

^

you can't compare Destiny to traditional MMO's though, since at it's core it's an FPS. What FPS games give new armor and weapons for free? and hundreds of them no less? When I used to play CoD you'd get 3-4 weapons and 2-3 maps for $15...... Compared to that this is a steal! lol The collector's edition pricing is wrong, flat out, no defending it. I hope they address it. But as far as the $40 price tag for this expansion, I'm not complaining.

FamilyGuy3895d ago

Ignoring the $13 a month subscription fee? F14 is great and the expansion is AMAZING but don't act like all you're spending is $40 to get that. There's a few MILLION people, all paying $13 or so PER MONTH to allow such a huge expansion at that $40 price.

JWiLL5523895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

@HammadtheBeast

This game has no subscription fee, it's unreasonable to think they're going to keep releasing exotic/legendary weapons and armor for free. The developers don't work for free.

Also, if what the media is saying is true, they've learned from their mistakes regarding how campaign missions play out. These will be more..."Halo-y" for lack of a better term :P

Rag on Bungie all you want, but people tend to overlook that this game has zero microtransactions. They easily could have bloated the game with them and a ton of people would pay whatever the cost (imagine if they offered Gjallarhorn for $5...)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3895d ago
spicelicka3895d ago

It's really not the game, it's what they did to it. Game is amazing, but they decided to withhold for the sake of money.

Brotard3895d ago

People love to rip of this game because they think it makes them look cool, when in all actuality this game is clearly on too something with how much it has sold and how much people play it.

Jughead34163895d ago

Activision are the ones to blame in my opinion. They have a history of milking franchises like COD and Guitar Hero. Now Destiny. Destiny was originally going to be a much longer game, but Activision broke up the content into DLC packs. I remember at the original PS4 console announcement, Bungie was there to reveal Destiny. And part of the trailer showed content that's in the latest DLC pack. I wish Bungie would break up with Activision. But Activision gave them $500 million for the next 9 years worth of Destiny content. How do you walk away from $500 mil?

zeuanimals3894d ago (Edited 3894d ago )

@Brotard:

I guess McDonald's is the greatest restaurant in the world because more people eat it than everything else all around the world. You know, there's multiple facets that go into selling a product, one of them is marketing and name recognition. Activision and Bungie are well known names, check, the game had a huge marketing push by both Sony and Activision, possibly the biggest we've ever seen, check. Maybe they are up to something, get popular names and a lot of marketing and you can sell anything. Even turds, right Dr. Oz?

FullmetalRoyale3895d ago

But how many people are throwing EPIC shade, though?
The Techland one was clever, I thought.

remixx1163895d ago

Well bungie has been gigging their own grave as of late.....it hurts watching a good Dev burn because of its publisher.

Johnsonparts233895d ago

why do people keep saying stupid shit like this? "digging their own grave"??? You mean having one of the most successful games of all of last year? Having a continued player base in the millions? Average daily player usage at more than 2 hours? How the hell is that digging their grave? If anything they're DROWNING in money. It's remained one of the most popular games overall and it launched a year ago! What other game from a year ago is talked about at all now? 1, and it's Destiny.

FamilyGuy3895d ago

So true, seems like literally every game from 1 year ago has faded from all media coverage. Nothing from a year ago gets talked about as much as Destiny.

UnwanteDreamz3895d ago

That is alot of made up BS. Sales were great and within 3 months people started leaving in droves. I'd like you to show me the official player counts. Activision hasn't released that info because it would show how few are still playing.

Truth is Destiny fans like to exaggerate how popular it still is.

corroios3895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

I really dont understand bungie. The first two DLC were part of the game. Everybody knows that. So, with all the time they had to prepare the next DLC why didnt they put tons of stuff???????? planets, raids, new modes, strikes, tons of armors and weapons?? Why? Now they are getting all this hate because they are ripping of the Core gamers of Destiny.

They want us to pay from another short DLC the same as a full game???? Really...

Brotard3895d ago (Edited 3895d ago )

"It was part of the game, everyone knows that"

Oh really? You are 100% sure they were done with it before hand? That's like saying you see a hotel with an addition with the exterior all done. Well if that's the case then the whole thing is done and why not just let people in. If the exterior is all done we all know the interior is!

@jwill552, thats right. in this update there is going to be a whole new location, "better storytelling, more halo like', a whole new campaign with new areas in already existing planets, multiple strikes, a new raid, many new pvp maps and modes, and new subclasses,

KwietStorm_BLM3895d ago

Go on, just keep defending it, so they can continue this in the future. They obvious didn't learn the first time around, and they clearly don't care with how they've moved forward.

warczar3894d ago

Come on dudebro, it's pretty obvious that at least the will of crota was done before the game released. I'm not saying destiny isn't a blast to play but it WAS an unfinished product and Activision IS ripping us off on the dlc.

Christopher3895d ago

Because that would take away content they could use in next year's release of Destiny 2.

JWiLL5523895d ago

The stuff you listed is exactly what's going to be in this expansion, other than a bunch of new planets. I don't expect that until the true sequel.

spicelicka3895d ago

He does clarify:
"please keep in mind, I'm not with the PS2 team or daybreak anymore though, so it's just some random asshole saying that. =)"

Brotard3895d ago

Maybe it's because of these kind of comments that he isn't with daybreak anymore?

yellowgerbil3895d ago

I played PS2 for an hour. the game is complete garbage, and why in the hell are friendlies Pink, yellow and green. I shot so many damn friendlies trying to figure out WHO the enemy was.
Back in the days of Mag I remember PC friends were talking this game up as the next great shooter, it is no MAG that's for sure. glitchy, empty, and bad map design.

pompombrum3895d ago

You know you've dun goofed when developers publicly take swipes at you.

Show all comments (45)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans389d ago (Edited 389d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr388d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast537d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

536d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris536d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

536d ago
anast536d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole536d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast536d ago (Edited 536d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

536d ago
anast536d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 536d ago
Profchaos537d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_536d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981536d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140536d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85536d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj536d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman536d ago (Edited 536d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake536d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn536d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg536d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07536d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

536d ago
Knightofelemia536d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 536d ago
Chevalier536d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom536d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac536d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake536d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark536d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde536d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125536d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)