Something like that.

With his stated hatred of interviews and such, I was floored when they called him on stage.

I've loved his work, Nier was great and teaming up with Platinum is a dream!

That clap at the end tho

Lol the guys downplaying The Last Guardian are really doing themselves a big disfavour. Perhaps they're minds were too busy being in the dumps to even grasp the idea that Fumito Ueda doesn't need to prove himself with his simple by powerful games but he's done exactly that twice before. Time after time he's made "Boy and Dog thing"-esque games and time after time he's been bombarded with praise for it.

I don't even like the Team Ico games, but they consistently rank in the top 100 games of all time for a reason. I guess these petty cynics are just being cynical for the sake of it because they can't live with the fact that they have to agree with the majority.

And Square Enix conference being crap? How cares, publishers don't even need a good conference because they throw their games across all the major platform conferences. If anything the biggest take-away from SE is that they've been shit for the past 8 years, but they're finally ready to start winning you over.

I like Nier, I'm excited for that game because it's also Platinum.

I played ICO and SOTC. I enjoyed both those games but not to the point where I am waiting on pins and needles for 9+ years for LG to drop. What they showed wasn't compelling and wasn't worth the long wait.

I don't think you realize that I am quoting the actual article. Those quotes are not from me Mr. TylerDurden, I didn't write them I just agree with what was said in the article.

"Can't show too much of a game like TLG. Can't give away what it's about,"

I played ICO and I played SotC and story wasn't really the big points of those games, it was environments and puzzles. So what they showed in that game there is a pretty good chance that is what the game is going to entail mostly.

"We didn't think it was that mediocre."

Great for you and the people on the edge of their seats, sadly I wasn't but I never stated or said that everyone should share my opinion. You seem to have forgotten the same when you constantly state that gamers don't want BC in many of your own posts. Or have you forgotten that too.

"it apparently wasn't that boring, as it warranted a sequel,"

Through kickstarter...14 years later...yea.

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.