Ryu in Smash Bros is almost an announcement too good to be true. But why would 2 of Capcom's biggest franchises be in Smash Bros when they don't even support the Wii U?
NE: "We're looking at modes, features, and mechanics that the next Super Smash Bros. game could include to set it apart."
Today, we're looking at 5 fighters whose Final Smashes could use a refresh to be more accurate to their home series.
Sam Woods from TheGamer Writes: "I couldn't help it, but I felt really happy and fond that something like that was going to happen."
Nintendo must of paid them a little to get these in the game so I think they don't feel the need to.
It's kind of like "We got some money out of them and we don't even have to support their console....just let them use our characters"
Don't do it, don't be like these guys...
http://playeressence.com/hi...
E3 more support from 3nd partys.?
could this tie into it, some how?
Asking why Capcom, some of the larger Japanese game publishers, are making bad decisions is a bit redundant at this point.
People forget Capcom do look out for Nintendo, last gen they gave Wii owners their own exclusive with Capcom vs Tatsunko, and like I told many people that game was great, people forget it because it was not on ps3/360, but in my opinion, it played better than marvel vs capcom 3, I almost trade in my Ps3 to get a wii to get the game, but good thing my friend live close by. They also get monster hunter series, so its not that they treat them bad they just know that games sell better on their handheld. If it is true that Nintendo got a hybrid console/handheld, they will get all the 3rd party games.