All Channels
Popular
140°

Destiny Needs Matchmaking Whether Bungie Agrees or Not

"The repeated decision to take matchmaking options out of Destiny is becoming a major issue. The Fireteam Chat crew discusses why."

mochachino4019d ago

Oh my god I agree so much with IGN on this. I've been asking for RAID matchmaking for so long.

The lack of matchmaking is ruining the game. Thank you IGN for bringing this up, the community has been asking for so long but it's nice to see a major site picking up on it.

KyRo4018d ago

I don't think it does need matchmaking, at least for trails and raids. Imagine all the new players trying a raid for the first time, dying 50 times, no good weapons and armour and rage Quiting. All it would do is infuriate the players who do know what they're doing.

What I think they should do is incorporate something that PS Home had. While I barley used it, you could add statuses under your PSN name/avatar name like 'looking to play 'insert game'' etc. Now if you could do that in the tower/reef you could see the gear they have, the level they are and if they have or haven't done the raids before. There's no way to check all that when you match made with randoms in destiny.

ABizzel14018d ago

If you know what you're doing chances are you're not looking for matchmaking on a regular basis to being with.

Matchmaking is need simply because you can't always get a group of 3 / 6 of your friends together to do up to 3 Raids (POE), with up to 3 characters, EVERY week.

The app is suppose to help with this, but frankly it doesn't fix the problem. Matchmaking would eliminate plenty of these issues, and the same way they block people from doing missions that are beyond their level, it should offer the same criteria for harder raids (such as the player must be level 32 or higher for POE).

If you've made it to level 34 you have at least a basic understanding of the game, and that's enough to coach a team to accomplish most challenges and help players get through all the content each week rather than missing out simply because they don't have 3 or more friends to do it with.

kayoss4018d ago

A lot of people do Crota's Raid because the loot are more rewarding and the armor are better. One big thing about the Crota's raid is because you can actually successfully Solo the entire raid if you wanted it ot (Since i've become level 34, Ive soloing Crota Hard mode).
The problem with Vault of Glass is that you cant really Solo it. Its almost nearly impossible to Solo VOG. This is why a lot of people dont do VOG. Having the option to select Match making for these Raid will increase it's play through. I can honestly tell you that since I've gotten the FateBringer, i dont really complete the VOG any more. I get to the Gorgon Maze chest and thats it.

Menkyo4018d ago

This guy gets it. Its bad enough doing the vanguard playlist and having a douche bag quit because he was just logging in for a few minutes and didn't want to PVP. Just join a clan and problem solved.

"I don't want to join a clan, I shouldn't have to join a clan to get my monies worth" yeah well I shouldn't have to go into pvp to complete exotic bounties. Yeah it sucks to have to join a clan in a game designed around clans.

Thunder_G0d_Bane4018d ago

Totally agree, its what stopping me from playing Destiny as it stands right now.

UKmilitia4018d ago

its why i sold it twice.
Reached lvl 30 and was bored,wanted to do the weeklys and raids etc with matchmaking and it obviously doenst have them.
it should be an option in every game mode.(the users choice)

GameSpawn4018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

I'm not going to disagree that all modes need some form of matchmaking, BUT KyRo has some points.

I've run VoG a few times myself and numerous Nightfalls and trust me when I say it would be a whole new level of hell doing those with PUGs that (1) barely meet the level requirement, (2) have NO mics or form of communication besides dancing and waving, and/or (3) no experience or weapons that would prove to be any use. It is one thing to wipe over and over again on a Strike [that takes an experienced group 15 minutes to finish] with checkpoints and be done in maybe an hour. It is another to go through a Raid (or high level PoE) that on average for an experienced group (maybe sherpa'ing a couple new players) will take a little over an hour. 15 minutes vs 1 hour...with experience and communication! Yeah, I can understand the exclusion of matchmaking on certain end game stuff. On the Raids PUGs would just lead to endless amounts of frustration and rage quits making those activities take even longer than they need to [by a LOT].

Does this mean that this content can never have matchmaking? Hell no!

There could just be limitations put on the matchmaking for endgame content, such as an option to be matched only with mic users. They should also only allow matchmaking if you meet or exceed the level of the content being played [28 VoG - 28+ Players; 30 VoG/30 Crota - 30+ Players; 33 Crota - 33+ Players; etc. for PoE]. This way there is no damage penalty for under leveled players (for those out of the loop with Destiny -1 from enemy level = ~30% damage penalty, -2 = ~40%, -3 = ~50%, and -4+ is a 100% penalty meaning enemies 4 levels over yours don't even feel a tickle - you are cannon fodder). People within the 3 level window could still play in the end game stuff, but they would just need to be part of a pre-made Fireteam or be invited.

Another thing to keep in mind if matchmaking is added to end game content is that if you use it you would forfeit that "right to kick" meaning if someone isn't pulling their weight and/or being a complete dick you cannot get rid of them.

Hereiamhereibe24018d ago (Edited 4018d ago )

Love your comment,
Also id like to add, if you dont like how Destiny works than stop playing it. If you cant make friends play a single player game, if you suck at video games/technology go outside. It seems like alot of people have someone with a gun to their head like "You better play Destiny! You better enjoy it too!" Stop and go play witcher i dont want to be matchmade with you fucking losers if im going to two man Crota, hell if they did that to me id immediately sell destiny.

bjmartynhak4018d ago

I simply stopped playing because of it.

Or it could actually balanced to play solo.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4018d ago
ZaWarudo4018d ago

It's the reason why i haven't bought Destiny yet.

No raid matchmaking is a no-buy for me.

rhap4018d ago

I stopped playing the game because of this. I just want to login, get in a random group and do content, no matter how hard it could be with random people. That would have made me buy the two expansions and keep playing it.

Baka-akaB4018d ago

Quite honestly , with random strangers , the game lack all interest and purpose , but it should be left up to people to decide

Kurt Russell4018d ago

I still haven't played a Raid because of this...

Thunder_G0d_Bane4018d ago

Same. Bungie needs to take their fingers out their ears and get with the program.

Show all comments (46)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans490d ago (Edited 490d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr489d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast638d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

638d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris638d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

638d ago
anast637d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole638d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast637d ago (Edited 637d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

637d ago
anast637d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 637d ago
Profchaos638d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_638d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981637d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140637d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85637d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj637d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman637d ago (Edited 637d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake637d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn637d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg637d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07637d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

637d ago
Knightofelemia637d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 637d ago
Chevalier637d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom637d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac637d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake637d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark637d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde637d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125637d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)