All Channels
Popular
80°

Microsoft Needs to Follow The Ubisoft 'AAA' Blueprint

MR BLACKMAGIK of the DRM Gamecast writes,
"GFFH. GFFH. It's an acronym that Xbox fans know all too well. GFFH! GFFH! It's more than an acronym, after hearing it for almost ten years it has become a chant that just won't stop. Gears, Forza, Fable, Halo! The four game franchises that Microsoft just won't let go. Every year we hear the chant, and frankly, I'm getting sick of it. A successful new intellectual property (IP) isn't easy to come by in this current ultra-competitive industry, but there is one company that seems to have a decent handle on things. One that dives head first into every new venture, for better or worse. Ubisoft. Here is why I think Microsoft needs to follow the Ubisoft blueprint on how to be create a successful, new, AAA franchise."

Read Full Story >>
drmgamecast.com
RosweeSon4024d ago

Microsoft needs to follow ubisoft AAA, what yearly updates and unfinished products?! No thanks.

rdgneoz34024d ago

Hopefully the likes of AC Unity never happen again...

harrisk9544024d ago

You could argue that the MCC was "unfinished"... the multiplayer, which is the central component of Halo, certainly was broken at release and continues to be broken to this day.

darthv724024d ago

you think multiplayer is the central component??? guess we play the same game for different reasons.

Blues Cowboy4024d ago (Edited 4024d ago )

I don't see "parody" tags anywhere. I think this is actually on the level.

Not all games need to become franchises. Setting up games to spawn franchises often leads to aggravating plot holes and cliffhangers. Would you like a new Halo and Gears pumped out each and every year, becoming increasingly broken and uninspired?

EDIT: "AAA games are being pressured to spend more on production and marketing. And us gamers, well, some of us are just getting bored of the same recipe with one new ingedient."

... which is the main problem with franchises! I can't even.

scottieleverne4024d ago

Well, they've already rewritten some of the Halo mythos to fit into the new story arcs that followed Bungie's original trilogy. At this point, who cares...

Haru4024d ago

well forza and halo are already anual relases

Gazondaily4024d ago (Edited 4024d ago )

Halo is an annual release?

The Morotsport series is completely different from Horizon.

Do you even?

InTheLab4024d ago

Halo 3 2007
Halo wars 2009
Halo ODST 2009
Halo Reach 2010
Halo CE AN 2011
Halo 4 2012
Halo Spartan Assault 2013
The MCC 2014
Halo 5 Guardians 2015

That's pretty damn close even if you remove Spartan Assault. The MCC and Halo CE were $40 and $60 games so yeah....that counts.

Very few franchises get pumped out like Halo and it's obvious why. Each game is basically another 6m copies sold for MS.

Now Forza....The franchise is annual dude. There's no debating that. It's the same as Need for Speed. Sure Underground and Shift are different but they are still of the same franchise. Forza is no different. It's annual.

Gazondaily4024d ago

Halo 3

Two years later:
Halo Wars was an RTS but okay
Halo ODST- an expansion...

Halo Reach- 3 years after Halo 3 as the first standalone game

Halo CE: Anniversary- remasters now count as part of the franchise?

Halo 4- 2 years after Reach

Spartan Assault was a mobile phone game
TMCC was a remaster package

Halo 5- 3 years after the last game

So since 2007 there in 8 year we have had:

Halo 3, Halo Reach and Halo 4. THREE main games in 8 years.

Forza- its bi-annual per game but yes, the franchise is an annual affair now.

Khajiit864024d ago (Edited 4024d ago )

Halo is an annual release. Maybe not 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 but they pump them out yearly pretty much, same as AC. And Forza.... Yeah Forza Motorsport and Horizon...... Still Forza.

Edit: I am pretty sure I bought ODST standalone full price but okay.

Spotie4024d ago

Does a Halo game come out every year or nearly? It's a yearly franchise.

Does a Forza game come out every year or nearly? It's a yearly franchise.

You can try to say it's a spinoff or whatever, but it's the same franchise. If people count handheld releases for God of War and Gran Turismo, why can't you count Halo Wars and Forza Horizon?

InTheLab4024d ago (Edited 4024d ago )

Halo Ce and The MCC collection both feature games that are so much more than a simple remaster. You may not choose to see them as standalone halo titles but MS does, which is why they are bundled with the Xbox 1.

Correct me if I'm wrong but Halo Spartan Assault is also on the 360 and X1 right? Is it not apart of the halo franchise?

And here we go with this "main game" crap. Technically, there's only 4 Call of Duty games with the last being Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. The rest aren't numbered so they're not the main game. Technically technically, the Advanced Warfare title is a spinoff of Black Ops 2, which is a spinoff of Modern Warfare, which is the "main game".

Listen, just take the L here. You are wrong. And in a round about way, you acknowledged how wrong you were with Forza.

Forgot about you non point on ODST. It may have started out as an expansion but name another expansion where you do not need the main game to play it and paid $60 for it?

Xavior_Reigns4024d ago

Halo isn't an annual release but it's damn close. Forza on the other hand is, or do you not count COD and AC as annual releases? As I remember that was the plan as I read in an issue of OXM in 2011 - to mirror COD releases.

Of course that isn't a problem as long as the quality reminds high, but again it has been annual since Forza 4. This will be confirmed again if Horizon 3 is announced this year.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4024d ago
PlayableGamez4024d ago

Halo is an annual release?
Halo 4 came out in 2012.
I didn't see no Halo 5 in 2013.
Keep trying troll...

Khajiit864024d ago

I am sure you bought a new halo game last year.

hades074024d ago

Halo is nowhere near an annual release.

LordDhampire4024d ago

and make shitty games what run equally bad on all systems....No thanks

Show all comments (27)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio27d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing27d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit27d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing27d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay29d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn230d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn229d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown30d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay29d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay29d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac29d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger30d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300030d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde30d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde29d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7531d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_28d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.