All Channels
Popular
90°

Microsoft (Yes, Microsoft) Has a Far-Out Vision

Last June, in the basement of the Microsoft visitor center in Redmond, Wash., Todd Holmdahl, a Microsoft hardware guru, and others nervously walked Satya Nadella, the new chief executive, through a demonstration of a secret project.

More than a hundred people had toiled for several years on the ambitious effort, which would eventually be called HoloLens. At the time, the HoloLens headset was a clunky web of straps, wires and electronics. But it was able to project images onto lenses in front of people’s eyes, adding virtual landscapes and objects on top of the view of the natural world.

4029d ago Replies(7)
mkis0074029d ago

I love the idea of hololens but if the power is enough to both block out and let in the parts of the real world then it must be expensive...I would likely buy it anyway. I love technlogy :)

Lennoxb634029d ago

Why do people keep saying they don't target gamers for Hololens? They don't really target it for any one specific group of people. It's a multipurpose device. It's not just for education, or work (Though if you work on a dangerous job like construction, the Hololens will most likely get you hurt). It's for whatever you want to use it for.

kraenk124028d ago

In the first generation(s) it will simply be too expensive for mass market gaming use. It will mostly find its use in the professional field. That's why people say that.

stuna14028d ago

Microsoft themselves haven't really shown anything game related marketing wise even in their demo of Hololens. That's not to say it won't come later as kraenk12 said. I believe that its initial use will be PC based because of the size of the PC cetric market and the diversity that associated with it! Doctors, Machinest, Architecture, Education ETC.

Aloy-Boyfriend4029d ago

Risks need to be taken in order to innovate. Hololens look like a nice peripheral with tons of potential. It isn't clear yet whether VR will succeed or not as well. We have to wait an see their killer apps and then talk.

Insomnia_844029d ago

As of now, with everything I've seen, read and heard from those who have had "hands-on" time with the device(non of them really did) , Hololens is years away from becoming a reality or a fully working product the way they want it to be. It all seems like very cool tech but I don't see it happening.

Apple wouldn't drop Google Glass for no reason.

Lennoxb634029d ago

They've been working on it since the beginning of last gen. It's been in development for a long time so it's not far off. And it's funny how you think that people would just lie about having hands on with it. Very prestigious journalists at that.

Insomnia_844029d ago

"The weird part

This device is obviously a long way off from being a product and Microsoft was being extremely protective of it.

.Build
(Microsoft)
This demo was orchestrated. Security was tight.
They took our backpacks and phones away. We not allowed to take photos of anything, not even the on-stage live performance demo.

They handed us notepads and pens to record information.

Each person did the demo in a private room, guided by a person hired to do demos according to a script. On the plus side: it was a nice quiet way to check out the device.

Downside: This person wasn't able to answer many questions about the device.

Friendly looking people in blue Microsoft shirts stood guard in front each door.

The effect was somewhere between theater and prison."

http://finance.yahoo.com/ne...

That's what I meant when I said they didn't really have a real hands-on. Everything in that demonstration in closed doors.

https://youtu.be/FfC8RoQcez...

poppinslops4029d ago (Edited 4029d ago )

That level of secrecy is standard procedure for new technologies - gaming journalists wouldn't experience it very often, so they're making a fuss... Microsoft don't want anyone ripping them off, so they restrict access to the tech.

VR is a known quantity, with umpteen variations coming to market... AR is less defined, thus Microsoft are seeking to set the standard by producing the 'Iphone' of it's kind.

Google glass was a joke - it was too nerdy for non-nerds, had zero potential for entertainment (films, games, music, etc), and very few practical applications... According to the previews I've read, Hololens has practical applications, entertainment value and a diversity of potential markets (industry, education, military, entertainment etc).

The tech has been around for a while (Microsoft have already spent several years working on AR), it's just never been widely available (sadly, the US army doesn't sell the new toys)... mid-to-late 2017 would be my guess for Hololens, but we'll know a lot more before then.

Show all comments (31)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio13d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing13d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit13d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing13d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay15d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn216d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn215d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown15d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay15d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay15d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac15d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300016d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde16d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood16d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde15d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7517d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_14d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.