As long as it's optional I think it'd be pretty cool.

@iamsuperman So your'e only pulling these negatives from speculation. Hm, ok. "These services"? The only one right now is EA Access and its doing really well for all the doom and gloom of "They'll pull games", "They'll lock content", "It's only bottom of the barrel bin games", "no new games will be added" speculation it received upon its announcement.

And it's $30 for one year, not $60, or $5 a month ( hey look you even get to test the games and the service for only $5 if you want). If every game in the vault right now (10 games) were as low as $20, which not even close to all of them are (and please don't pull the ebay card) you'd be paying over $100 to own all of them on the xbox one. More than what you'd be paying for a year of EA Access, and even if Ubisoft and Activision (Ehhhh, I don't really want Activision to) joined and started with a base of five games in their vaults, buying the 3 services for $30 each wouldn't come close to how much you'd have to spend to buy all those games separately, and hey, it's optional too!, but of course it doesn't matter, because based on how EA Access is coming along right now, it's obviously going to go to Sh*t anyways. /s

Tired of all this potential doom and gloom pessimism. I mean, you have a right to worry. These companies pull some shady ish some times, but it's. just. all. negative speculation man. And the service is even good.

I seriously wonder about the mental stability of people who write articles like these. How in the name of all that is holy can that this EVER be a good idea. If more companies do this then people will end up having to choose only one service to subscribe to because the cost to be subscribed to all would be astronomical.