Or Counter-Strike Global Offensive

Or Vanquish.

I do think that most shooters are just rails of almost nothing, though. Obviously older games like Counter Strike has more to it.

Or battlefield with a good team.

Titanfall introduced some fresh stuff like parkour and big robots, but other than that it did pretty much what other shooters have been doing.

Worfestein The New Order has been the only shooter so far to go back to the FPS roots and do it well. I think FPS nowadays are relying too much in the military stuff and generic run-and-shoot multiplayer. COD has oversaturared the genre.

I also miss the older and true arena shooters . Even if deemed brainless , part of their competitive fun was the level of intricacy , depth and skills , they might require . A bit like playing fighting games

The issue is that modern shooter automatise so much basic actions , that it needs to engage you into some sort of teamplay accomplishement , so you could feel relevant and useful ...

Yet the mainstream and most popular of those shooter fail quite a bit at making the teamwork and play actually work ... it devolves into run and shoot , with automatized games and some obsession over K/D ratios .

Of course some of those are still present on PC be they obscure or not , but it's not the same . And at least on consoles there were still stuff like Halo , a bit destiny despite it's flaws , and MGO to compensate a bit .

I would say Titanfall is a sort of arena shooter.

i agree with you more and more ..modern FPSs are the garbage of gaming and only HALO CE(the 1st only) can be played very pleasantly and have fun replay value ....also has anyone tried MGO from MGS4 ?? although a TPS this is the best competitive (and tactical) multiplayer game i ever played ...although a TPS