im guessing yes, they do.
theres really no point to them being OS only

@IGiveHugs2NakedWomen

exactly the first thing i was gonna do.
BUT i just realized mapping it to X will significantly hinder navigation, since you use your thumb that was on r-stick to jump

I'd actually hate that, it's R1/RB so you don't have to take your thumb off the analogue stick when jumping, it's part of the reason why it's so fluid when climbing and jumping.

are you being serious? that would ruin how the parkour mechanics work. Its mapped like it is to help you, not hinder. if it was on the X button, then you would have to take your thumbs off the stick. They did a brilliant job in choosing button placement in my opinion.

I also want this feature for Dragon Age. I really can't play the game due to basic attack being on R2. My brain can't get used to it, nor do I want it to. It just doesn't make sense for this type of game, and I don't understand the big change from not only previous DA games, but from the norm of the genre in general. Basic attack = X. Although I think I read that the upcoming DA:I patch is adding button mapping. Though it's hard to tell, the way it's worded......it may not be that at all.

However, you should already be comfortable playing DA over remote play, now that your comment makes me think about it. Had I thought about this before, I probably would have actually been playing since launch instead of playing for a couple days and not going back.........When using remote play, can't you customize what buttons the front and back touchscreen sections represent? In other words you should be able to map R2 to the bottom/right corner of the touchscreen, which ergonomically is alot like hitting X on a dualshock. In fact, it may even be better that way since you still have all the face buttons for skills. Hmmmm, I may try this later.

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

The world would be better?

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lmao!!!!