All Channels
Popular
760°

Phil Harrison to leave Microsoft

Executive Phil Harrison is leaving Microsoft, GamesIndustry.biz has learned through multiple sources at GDC, though Microsoft has so far refused to confirm his departure.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
lifeisgamesok4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

This sucks if true but hopefully there's a good replacement and good luck to him

As long as we got Phil Spencer as the Xboss I'm happy :)

Cartmans4100d ago

This guy almost killed Sony with his stupid decisions like pricing the PS3 during launch at $600!!

christocolus4100d ago

I thought that was Kutaragi?

SoapShoes4100d ago

It wasn't him. Also he was Kaz's spy to one up Xbox. Good job Phil for helping Sony while not on the payroll.

OrangePowerz4100d ago

You can't blame the price of the console on him, he didn't design it.

Cartmans4100d ago

I work for Sony undercover

#truth

Godmars2904100d ago

"I thought that was Kutaragi?"

He was likely to blame for the software architecture issue. The "harder to program for" goto complaint.

Umbasa4100d ago

Kutaragi you mean, yes?

_-EDMIX-_4100d ago

..not really. What they did with the PS3 i feel was just fine.

They couldn't launch it below $600 AND have bluray. They needed both.

At the end of the day, having bluray paved the way for it to be cheap enough to be in PS4 AND XONE and have PS4 selling the way it is...

I'm sorry but INVESTING is what happens in the game industry, you don't think CD's where expensive when PS1 launched? Its why Nintendo passed it up, don't think DVD was expensive in 2000? Fact remains, they invested and made a very sound choice.

...mind you, PS3 sold MORE units then the 360. Phil did a great job, the team did a great job with what they were dealt with.

They had a long term plan, stuck with it and PS4 and XONE have blurays in them because of that long term plan...

Next time you play a game thats like MGSV, GTAV or FFXV...do yourself a favor and thank Sony and teams that pushed for Bluray to be in the PS3.

80 plus million units of PS3's sold also means its 80 plus million MORE bluray players sold to give you the cheap, nice new bluray players that launched this gen.

I'm sorry but it would have been a STUPID choice to take Bluray out JUST to reach a low price.

Soooo gimp all of gaming JUST so folks don't got to pay for a new format?

I'd rather pay for innovation and progression of gaming, then have a cheaper system that has less JUST to be cheaper.

It was a great choice evident by PS3 still selling well and PS4 having a cheap Bluray player....they invested and won.

PS4 is ONLY doing THIS WELL BECAUSE OF THAT SACRIFICE!

Hell, add XONE to that too as its using a Bluray player..

Thehyph4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

@edmix
"you don't think CD's where expensive when PS1 launched? Its why Nintendo passed it up"

Nope, I don't. CD's may have been expensive in 1982. In 1995 the jewel case was more expensive than the CD contained within. Also, Nintendo 64 cartridges were way more expensive to produce than optical storage.

Godmars2904100d ago

CD data loaded slower than carts, but their memory capacity far exceeded and was more cheaper.

360ICE4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

He didn't design the console nor price it. He obviously had his say, but I think it's pretty unreasonable to put that issue on Harrison's shoulders. He was vice president and head of third party relations and research and development. You really should do your homework before just blaming anyone.

What he did do was bring franchises like LittleBigPlanet to PlayStation. I'd also argue that MS has been much better overall since he started.

miyamoto4100d ago

He also almost killed the Xbox One with Don Mattrick!

mikeslemonade4100d ago

He's the best spokesperson in the gaming industry. I know that's not a popular opinion but during his speeches he makes things seem more important than they actually are. On stage he would make the PS3 sound mysterious.

Omegasyde4100d ago

hmm Phil was one of pushers for playstation home and iirc pushed for more motion sense games (ala the eventual release of ps move)

But

but

Pretty much bankrupt Atari while he was leading that sinking ship

Gazondaily4100d ago

Lol Phil the double agent. Would certainly be interesting if he joins Sony but I highly doubt that's possible with the kind of non-compete clauses Microsoft's lawyers would have no doubt drawn up.

pixelsword4100d ago

Didn't he also shoot JFK from a UFO with Bigfoot as the driver?

Sevir4100d ago

Ken Kutagari was the one who gave the ok to launch PS3 at $600. Phil was tasked with bringing the games as he was the former head of world wide studios, he unified Sony's disjointed studios under the umbrella and mandated that the all share a common engine. At that time Shu was working under him as the vice president of WWS. Get your stories straight.

Phil Harrison Brought games green lit Resistance, Infamous Uncharted, and was responsible for the acquisition of LBP and Media Molecule And Evolution.

This man does his homework.

raptorjacob4100d ago

you guys are acting like the ps3 was a dud. clearly it wasnt ever in bad shape. People still bought it at $600 and developers figured it out. Its actually one of my favorite systems.

fr0sty4100d ago

That $600 console was still outselling its competition, and even though it never caught up to the Wii, it is still selling today while Wii is not.

sarshelyam4100d ago

Yet it was the cheapest and most proficient Blu-Ray player released at the time. I'd understand the complaints if you actually understood the market when PS3 release, but it's a very narrow-minded approach when all you're doing is considering the price compared to the competition.

Even with the higher price, Sony bought into technology hard that has been adopted, even now, by its competitors. Blu-Ray was an expensive format, and Sony helped define it as a standard...and did so with a plan that would inevitably have them running toe-to-toe with their closest competitor.

Syntax-Error4100d ago

Phil Harrison is a tool. He came from Sony in 2012 to MS and got upset because he was passed over for a promotion when Mattrick left ffor Zynga. How do you expect to get promoted within 2 years

nowitzki20044100d ago

Why do people keep knocking on that $600 price point.... Go research the cheapest bluray player at the time the ps3 came out.... There is none cheaper than the PS3.

sonarus4100d ago

Tough loss for Harrison. With his experience and resume though, i am sure he will land on another fantastic opportunity in relatively no time

richardmmorales4100d ago

The PS3 wasn't priced at $600. Don't know why everyone keeps saying this. It was $500 for the 20 GB Model and $600 for the 60 GB Model. Everyone acts like starting price was $600 when it was $500.

Also cheapest stand alone Blu-ray player at the time was $1,000. Also at the time a lot of people acted as if Sony had invented Blu-ray. Sure were a few misconceptions back then.

Kleptic4100d ago

First, harrison was in charge of SCE world wide studios...he worked with Sony's umbrella of first party developers...he never had much influence or 'say' on the PS3's hardware...

second...the PS3 was not intentionally released at $500...in 2004, rumors were everywhere of an Xbox '2', and a PS3...both at around $400...with a release of both for 2005...sony never 'delayed' the PS3, but held off on announcements for it...all while the BD diode issue hit, and production was pretty much impossible for a 2005 release...

that manufacturing problem, unforseen before it was too late, is why the price got jacked up considerably, why it had a staged release in Europe...and why shareholders asked for Kutaragi's head just after release in 2006...

So yes, BD was always a great long term plan...just pointing out...Originally Sony didn't know that BD would end up being even that expensive...the original plan was to have a competing console at around the price of a 360...but with BD...by the time the issue showed up, it was too late to redesign, and kutaragi took the brunt of the fall out...

no other brand in gaming hardware would've survived 2006 and 2007...Sega made less of a mistake a generation before, and was scuttled within a year...If the problems occurred when there were still options, i guarantee the PS3 would've ended up being a very different console than what it ended up being...

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 4100d ago
christocolus4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

True.it sucks.he helped with the creation of lift and soho and he had an eye for good talent. Sad. but being a VP he hardly ever made announcements or appeared at major events.he never tried to reach out to fans.i always wondered why. Phil Spencer and the other execs never mentioned him in discussions.even lower execs like Ken lob and chris duncan are a lot more popular with xbox fans. the article also says he was close friends with Don mattrick infact it was Don who hired him.may be he is leaving to join Don at Zynga.

"GamesIndustry.biz understands that Harrison grew frustrated when Mattrick's departure and Spencer's subsequent promotion did not result in him moving up the corporate ladder, issuing the ultimatum to Microsoft that he would leave if not offered a new position. However, it seems that no offer was forthcoming, and Harrison has made good on his promise"

turdburgler10804100d ago

I always wonder what the VP for a business does anyway? They always seem to be in the background clapping and saying nice things. Sounds like a pretty cushy job to me. Sure he got paid well. I could do that. I'd be damn good at it too. I'd have the perfect clap down and wave. Do photo ops and echo what Phil said. Then when people asked me serious questions I would refer them to other people and shrug. I'd tell them that I'd have my people get in touch with their people.

christocolus4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

@turdburgler

lol. I honestly do not know what most VP's do. I think their job functions are usually stated but most of the time its just a title given to these guys to make them feel important. Ken Lobb will be a perfect replacement imo.

Bigpappy4100d ago

Never warmed up to Harris. He doesn't come off as someone I can trust. Hopefully Sony will take him back. I don't know of any accomplishments he achieved while with Xbox.

SoapShoes4100d ago

I agree, he did wonders for PlayStation though. He was there since launch of PS1.

tanukisuit4100d ago

He was also with Atari for some time. Though, to be honest, it didn't help Atari much...

Gamer19824100d ago

Erm he came to xbox and brought a load of ps3 technologies and ideas with him which boosted 360 sales.. MS got him purely for his knowledge on what sony had in the pipelines and they used that to beat sony to the market and match them and now that has dried up they no longer need him.

gamerfan1284092d ago

More childish, ignorant, blind fanboy personal attacks.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4092d ago
Thatguy-3104100d ago ShowReplies(1)
OrangePowerz4100d ago

Was he even doing anything at MS?

Zeref4100d ago

This^

I don't think he even had an E3 talk for the past 2 years. Or any other conference for that matter.

tiffac0084100d ago

He was a spy embedded by Sony. XD

TheFanboySlayer4100d ago

lmfao...exactly...bubbles to you

DOMination-4100d ago

He announced tomb raider as exclusive at gamescon 2014 but don't remember him at any other conference. Phil seems to like taking that on himself

joeorc4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

Was he doing anything at Microsoft?

Of course he was

http://www.thatericalper.co...

As you can see he was doing quite a lot while he was there. /s

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4100d ago
PrinterMan4100d ago ShowReplies(3)
Zeref4100d ago

He was annoyed at the fact that he didn't get the Xbox head position.

Good riddance to you sir.

Mr Pumblechook4100d ago

Spencer promoted his friend Aaron Greenberg when Phil Harrison was a more suitable choice.

Aceman184100d ago

If true this was fast lol. How long has he been there?

Syntax-Error4100d ago

"According to GamesIndustry International, Harrison "grew frustrated" when former Xbox boss Don Mattrick left the company in 2013 to join Zynga. Harrison, according to sources, was also frustrated when Phil Spencer's promotion to Head of Xbox did not lead to a promotion for him.

Finally, the site claims Harrison issued an ultimatum to Microsoft, saying he would leave the company if he was not offered a new, better position."

Fatal-Aim4100d ago

That's gotta hurt....him leaving one company he's been at for years to join the dark side of another, and find that he actually hates it there.

Eejanaika4100d ago

Never was a fan of him but as long as phil spencer stays im happy

solid_snake36564100d ago

Phil never sticks with one company. From Sony to Atari to Nintendo then to Microsoft.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4092d ago
getrektedmate4100d ago

Good now I want Aaron GreenBerg, Larry Hyrb and some others to leave as well since they have done nothing besides destroy Xbox one. Thank god Phil Spencer came to the rescue. And don't even remind me of Don Mattrick...

SoapShoes4100d ago

GreenBurg is the most annoying exec of all the companies. Such a big gloating mouth, it's disgusting! Have some damn class for crying out loud.

Xavior_Reigns4100d ago

That guy is a troll, he really needs to be sent away.

Multiplatguy4100d ago

Larry Hyrb leads the team responsible for the monthly updates. Why should he leave? Because you personally don't like him?

OrangePowerz4100d ago

They could probably find a more sympathetic PR guy to do Hyrbs job.

Multiplatguy4100d ago

@OrganPowerz

But Hyrb is not just some PR guy.. He is director of programming and has done a lot for the actual technical side of Xbox. Especially the Xbox One with monthly updates.

These are ignorant and childish comments to make.

DOMination-4100d ago

Not to mention Greenburg is head of marketing so its kinda his job to talk and big up the xbox. Hes actually nowhere near as bad as he was in the early days of the 360 but that impression has stuck with people

Immorals4100d ago

Major Nelson is annoying, but he's a valuable member of the team. First and formost, he's a gamer. And that's what game companies need, not like suits. Like greenberg..

cell9894100d ago

Mmmm I feel like he's a gamer cause that's his job and he has to.I dont know might be exaggerating here, but he's always come up as a poser. Like he does it to fit in with the fans, at times you can see him trying too hard

porkChop4100d ago

Probably for the best. He helped botch the PS3 launch, and did the same again with the Xbox One. Phil used to be great but he seems to have lost his touch.

Axonometri4100d ago

Put Xbox and Windows 10 together, lead by Phil Spencer. Microsoft... Tear down this Wall!

d_g4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

As long as Phil Spencer xbox boss

microsoft will do great in gaming :)

TheLastColossus4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

How it will do that when early dlc is whats mostly important instead of exclusives?

d_g4100d ago (Edited 4100d ago )

scalebound
gears of war 4
halo 5
quantum break
Crackdown
Phantom Dust
sunset over drive
forza 6
FH 2
etc..

what you call that early dlc or exclusives smart man ?

Show all comments (118)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot27d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle27d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7727d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7731d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
32d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300032d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7232d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit32d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

32d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania32d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit32d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0731d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr32d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box32d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr32d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9532d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7232d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--32d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7232d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket32d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm32d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde32d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9231d ago (Edited 31d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
maximusprime_32d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

32d ago
BeHunted32d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

32d ago
CrashMania32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit32d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9231d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

31d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
shadowT32d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers32d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14932d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0731d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)