
Eurogamer - This one took us by surprise. A study undertaken by US pollmeisters Nielsen revealed this week that "better resolution" is the top reason people bought PlayStation 4 over its competition. It's a remarkable, perhaps even unbelievable result, and one we wanted to dig into more deeply, so we contacted the director of Nielsen Games, Nicole Pike, asking about the size and make-up of the sample and how respondents were directed into giving their answers.

Authentic representation can only happen if developers have the determination to make it happen.

The cash will be distributed in the form of targeted grants issued via the UK Games Fund.

Growth driven by digital software and console hardware sales.
This tripe written by Richard Leadbetter just reads like one gigantic love letter to Microsoft, attempting to gloss over and shift the goalposts, pertaining to the Xbox One's graphical shortcomings in relation to the Ps4.
This odious website blasted Sony's Ps3 for an entire generation regarding any smidgeon of inferiority against the Xbox 360, but now when Sony has a clear graphical resolution edge, lets sweep it under the rug and shift the agenda onto framerate. Then when they lose in both resolution and framerate, as was the case a week or so back with Evolve, they deny Sony the win and call it an even draw, because with yet more goalpost shifting they say the overall game experience is best enjoyed using on the Xbox live service.
With hypocrisy like this, it is no wonder that long overdue serious questions are only now, starting to be raised over the ethics, standards and corruption within certain areas of game journalism, even though if has been well known about and has existed for years.
Again you are misunderstanding what i am trying to say pappy. I agree with you that games at lesser resolutions can look better in some instances and that it's a balancing act of give and take, compromise, as well as art choices and that lowering the resolution can free up other areas to add more polish and grunt for the developers to get the best out of every system but that is not what i am talking about and well you know it.
The only reason that you keep harping on about this is because your console of choice has struggled to keep up in this regard.
I am referring to the motives and goal post shifting of Richard Leadbetter at Eurogamer and visually impaired gamers such as yourself who have an agenda to downplay Sony while heaping lavish praise upon microsoft.
It begs the question, why are you defending this? Would you not want to get the best visual and gameplay bang for your buck at the highest optimum settings that each system will allow.
The answer lies in the simple fact that you have a part of your lower anatomy shoved so far up the jacksie of the American game manufacturer that it has clouded your judgement.
You bought a console that struggles to attain 1080p for certain titles, therefore you are scrambling to defend Microsoft's 720p - 900p titles and have to find any way to downplay Sony's 1080p offerings.
Resolution does not matter and its been proven. Gameplay matters.
I wish developers would focus on framerate first then work the graphics around it. I wish people would shut the hell up about resolution. It doesn't affect gameplay, but framerate does, damn it!
Every little bit matters, but those without what they never had will always say otherwise. This site is certainly proof of that.