
A question that is often discussed in the gaming community, particular when a game seems to be over or underrated, is that of the average review score. Some will argue that because metacritic is on a scale of 0-100 then the average review score is 50. Others will argue that the average is much higher, perhaps 60, or 70, or 80. What we're left with is people arguing over whether a game is above average or below average without actually knowing what the average is.

All available May 5.
I think the only game here for me is Nine Sols. Was always interested in that game.
Good month for me, I wanted that particular footy game and thought it might be due. Anyway who cares, shame about the site I'll miss the comment sections. All the best everyone.
Naughty Dog was reportedly divided on the controversial fate of Joel in The Last of Us Part 2 during the game's development.
I think it was good decision, if he was still alive, he would have been a mascot just like Kratos, drake and many others. These old dudes gotta die for new characters to take center stage with their own storyline. They keep dragging the emotional baggage into many sequels and eventually the story just turns into absolute shit show.
Honestly as much as I loved the game, they could have just not killed him off.
I get it creator vision and all but killing a character that made you millions is just wrong imo. At least have him go down fighting.

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.
Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.
They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.
I always likened it to grade school growing up. A kid who scores 50-55% in a class is not considered average, that is barely passable. Average to me has always fallen in the 60-70% range.
I'm beginning to believe that people write reviews and post comments on Metacritic for the sole purpose of artificially inflating or deflating scores of certain games. It's an incredibly flawed system that is completely open to manipulation, just like the bubble system here on N4G.
It's meaningless, because depending on where an individual review came from it might get less weight in the average's equation or none at all. User reviews are even more of a joke.