All Channels
Popular
530°

Honesty Andrea Pessino - interview

Eurogamer:

There are many considerations that have passed through my head playing The Order 1886. Some choices I shared, others less, but the luck of my job is that sometimes I get the chance to confront the people behind those decisions. Here then is the report of my interview with Andrea Pessino, co-founder of Ready at Dawn, which I had the pleasure of meeting at its Milan stage for the launch of the game. Rarely I happened to interview someone so honest and sincere and I hope that the following will help you to know him better.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
nicksetzer14112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

What? Now the creators of the game are doing reviews for their own game? This has to be the weirdest thing I have ever heard.

Plus it is weird how he goes about it, as if he is claiming other "opinions" to be wrong... "The 8 that you give, I think, is the more accurate opinion." It seems like that is the score he wants people to have, either way seems really unprofessional to me.

@sckipt it is one thing to judge your own game, it is a whole other thing to publicly exclaim it.

@jackson I was clearly being a bit sarcastic, (as it clearly wasn't a full review) regardless though, it is really weird. Cannot think of ANY other dev other than Phil Fish who basically said what score their game deserves.

Rimeskeem4112d ago

I'm guessing most do it just only a select actually put it out there.

HaveSumNuts4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

This is kind of sad and pathetic at the same time. Devs make the game not review their own game as well. Of course the people that made it are going to think it's great, I made myself a sandwhich and gave it an 8 I thought it was great but if I gave it to Gordon Ramsey he'd probably say it tastes like shit lol. The Order could be an 8 if it was out of 15 though.

Snookies124112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

@HaveSumNuts - No, this game from what I've seen certainly warrants a 7-8 out of 10. Maybe a 6 at the low end... It's an experience, much like Heavy Rain was. Sure, it's not for everyone and that's okay. They were doing what they wanted, and not worried about being pressured into something they didn't want to make. It's unique, and that's a great thing. The game may not be the best, but it's an amazing start to what I hope is a future franchise.

nveenio4112d ago

I don't see anything wrong with taking pride in your own game and thinking that the low-end reviews are simply people who don't relate to your vision. For instance, I'd give the Mona Lisa a 6. But that's only because that kind of art doesn't strike me, and I probably don't understand it enough to give an opinion which accurately considers all of its nuances.

steven83r4112d ago

Ya pretty much. What i am seeing is most of the bashing is coming from Xbox fans and those who have yet to play it. All this complaining about it being a Gears rip off and the walking so much walking. Well most want Shenmue and don't even realize the amount of QTE and walking involved in that game. Which is one of the best games ever. Still play it to this day.

Reibooi4112d ago

I am kinda confused at the hate to be honest. I mean yes I agree the game isn't the best thing ever and I would personally give it about a 7.5 maybe a 8. But the thing that gets me alot is that this isn't the first game that is like this but it's getting so much hate.

Example Heavenly Sword. It was like the Order a showcase of what they PS3 could do and was short and had game play that was not up to par with others in the genre like Devil May Cry. The game also focused alot of story and was crazy pretty at the time. Yet you have the order which is basically the same but in a Third person shooter body and people hate it. Kinda odd if you ask me.

I hope they make another Order because the foundation is there(just like the foundation was there for Heavenly Sword) all they have to do is build on it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4112d ago
TheJacksonRGN4112d ago

The guy said he agrees with the 8 and their opinion. He wasn't reviewing the game. Nothing weird about that.

You are acting liking he wrote an actual review and scored it an 8.

SoapShoes4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

The disagrees you got are proof of the rampant fanboys here. You just point out what actually happened rather than what the clickbait headline suggests and you get tons of them. Probably a few people with multiple accounts.

hasamalaha4112d ago

He may not be giving a full blown review, but he is giving it a score (by saying that 8 is the right opinion).

joeorc4112d ago

D@men, people did not read it it seems, he agreed with, not that he was the one reviewing his own game
If anything it shows he is not defensive about his own game!

lxlkuyaboilxl4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

I feel like you are one of the few people that actually read the Eurogamer article and not just the small article on vg247.

The vg247 article title makes it sound like Andrea gave his own game an 8, but in reality he just agreed with the interviewer's opinion.

If you look even further the Eurogamer interviewer challenged Andrea to convince him that the game is a 9, but Andrea actually agreed with the lower score. This article's title got your clicks and it definitely got mine. I'm not going to lie, I initially thought it was weird for them to put out a review score for their own game. It's crazy how easy the internet can sway the opinion of many.

With that said, I bought the game and enjoyed it. I finished the game wanting more, but I'll wait to see what R@D has in store for their next game. On the fence about spending $60 on the game? Wait for it to be on sale. No one is forcing you to buy it now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4112d ago
christocolus4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

I feel kind of sorry for these guys. Its their first AA title and they are trying really hard to defend it which is quite understandable,but they obviously got a lot to learn when it comes to reviews and critics. over 85% of the reviews so far fall between 70 to 50. The game is obviously flawed and in addition to what Rashid stated below,i think they need to go over multiple reviews of the game,check gamer forums to see where the mistakes were made then try to improve upon them in the sequel.Stating what score you think is best for your game doesn't help it in anyway with that said i think they will learn over time the need to develop thicker skins in this business.

mkis0074112d ago

34 out of 62 are 70 or above...:)

wsoutlaw874111d ago

He doesn't seem to be trying hard to defend it at all. The interviewer asked him to argue it was a 9 and he said he agreed it was an 8. I also agree its an 8. If you don't like games with cut scenes that are very story heavy then this isnt the game for you. If you do then it's around an 8. I don't review games of genres i dont like and give them 4s.

Gazondaily4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

And to think, Cliffy B got so much flak for saying that one review site got it wrong.. At least in the above scenario Cliffy went into detail about why he thought said publication was wrong. Still, that outburst of his made him look childish nonetheless and ultimately made him more hated in the industry.

Here this guy says our game deserves an 8.No it doesn't. Not to me and a lot of other people. Silly really but I guess he sees his work through a different perspective entirely.

Well, the franchise has potential really if the devs take the criticisms on board and make the game The Order deserves to be not what it is right now.

BitbyDeath4112d ago

I don't agree, the consensus from reviews is that if they tacked on multiplayer then all of a sudden it'd get 9's and 10's. Multiplayer is great but not needed imo.

blockcoc4112d ago

@BitbyDeath Why does it have to be a tacked on multiplayer? Thats a bad excuse. They could just work hard and make a great multiplayer experience. I wonder if they did that would all the people shouting about tacked on multiplayer complain about it?

BitbyDeath4112d ago

Some of the greatest games have no multiplayer, the last guardian is one of the most asked for games and will likely have no multiplayer. I do agree that this game would have been great with local co-op but it shouldn't be judged for not having it.

StarLord_Who4112d ago

It was good, not great, a good foundation but come on 8?

The story unravels spectacularly in the last quarter, half of the levels are just cutscenes and the game begins and ends with a graphics demo. Plus, the way they began the game was unforgivable.

The shooting mechanics were great, the guns are great and the acting was too but it just felt like a quarter of a game with more polish than usual on the engine.

Muerte24944112d ago

He's allowed to disagree with your opinion, Jesus. Let not act like that game wasn't getting any hate on it from the moment they showed it.

I think your post deserves a 2. I don't agree with it but it's written well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4112d ago
nidhogg4112d ago

Ready at Dawn is like that little kid who just can't win against anybody else so he just whines how good he is in his own way anyway.

SamPao4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Maybe you mean people that are Always changing the subject just to try to prove a point, when there is none (hint:you)

bouzebbal4112d ago

Have you actually read the article?
i bet not..
This game is a 8/10 for me as well. It's definitely lacking extra content but the solo mode is very engaging and intense. Story is told in a good way and acting is on point!
It's the perfect mix between Shenmue, TLoU and Heavy Rain if i have to describe it.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

It's not any more or less biased than the rants and diatribes pretending to be reviews over the last 4 days. To all of the reviewers who did nothing but repeat the same nonsense that has been said ever since the first DEMO was made available last year, feel free to post your "lame attempts at gotcha moments" here and disagree as much as you like. My imaginary tears await your ritalin induced responses.

The game is well made but short... 7/10... The end...

andibandit4112d ago

dude...its like you're living in some sort of imaginary world

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen4112d ago

@andibandit

And yet you took the time to respond to my delusional mind. Who would have thunk it?

gangsta_red4112d ago

I've never seen so many people upset at a game getting bad reviews.

Like so upset that these people call for the abolishment of review scores, that journalists are paid off, that reviewers are fanboys of another console. Any and all excuses except for the fact that their game may not be as good as they thought it was.

I mean we heard all the complaints from the early demo and you guys dismissed them and made even more excuses of, "it's just a demo, it's still in progress.". As if the gameplay and action was going to dramatically change from the demo to retail.

All the signs were there, but yes in your imaginary world, people were just picking on poor Sony and their exclusive game.

Death4112d ago

At the end of the day the game is a 65 on Metacritic. That's not very far from 7 or 70 is it? How are all the reviews skewered if they are a half point away from your assessment?

Prime1574112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

@Andibandit,

did you take the time to play the game? I doubt it.

Learning to form your own opinion by your own experiences is reality and responsibility.

Taking other people's opinions and making them your own is delusional.

There are people LOVING and hating this game (just like Ryse was loved and hated, and many more games that have passed and will come).

At least you live blissfully in your ignorance.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4112d ago
uth114112d ago

He was asked by an interviewer, and responded, agreeing with their score. Headline makes it out to be something else

joeorc4112d ago

What is ironic is one of the developers agreed the game they made deserves a 8! He did not say well it deserves higher score, he even agreed about the score.

This shows that even they know they need work to be better for making a game. No problem there agreeing with the other persons score.

nucky644112d ago

well nick, it's also weird how many people are knocking this game and never give any in-depth opinions on why they're doing so - and why? because they've never played it. look at the negative comments on this thread - nobody says much, if anything. and when someone does say something, it's usually very vague.

I've played the order and enjoyed it. yea, there were some things I didn't like: why doesn't the arc gun chain to more than one enemy if they're bunched up?? with such a beautiful world, there could have been some more exploration and loot to find. and there were a few times where we weren't allowed to run and that was odd. I also did not like the revival animation at all. also, I think there could have been, after completing the game,a few bonus chapters where we play as lady igraine and find out what she was doing while we followed galahad. all in all, the game was fun with a good story - a solid 8.2 for me.

mhunterjr4112d ago

I think people have given many in-depth reasons why they knock it... Many of the reasons you've touched on.

Other issues include the frequency in which control is taken from the player, the moronic "whack-a-mole" AI with limited tactics, the lack of content and a lack incentive to replay,

Seriously, I'm pretty confident a sequel will be FANTASTIC, if RAD addresses these concerns. But right now, I can understand why someone would rate it between a 6 &7.

Cid334112d ago

scary when devs think there game is not an 10/10 that means that they did not give it there best. you have to believe in what you create, or no one else will.

joeorc4112d ago

Or on the same token the developer agrees that they still need work to make a new franchise even better!

mhunterjr4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Seriously it doesn't mean that. Anyone ever involved in product development or programming is always looking for areas of improvement. They have to juggle releasing a working product on time, and achieving all goals...

Giving your own game a 10/10 means that you think it's perfect. No real developer could ever say that honestly, knowing all of the things they wanted to add or improve but couldn't due to time constraints.

I wouldn't take any developer seriously if they suggested that their game was perfect...

Magicite4112d ago

I thought developers rate their games with 10/10 always, just like parents love their children.

otherZinc4112d ago

No,

2/10
Is the right score.

Kal-V34112d ago

You are crazy, my friend. Straight up looney toons. You can not like it and that is fine. But in no WAY this it a 2 out of 10 game. I loved it and i would give it a ridiculously solid 8 exactly. 2/10 is Ride to Hell: Retribution.

PudgeyBurrito4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Hey now, Phil Spencer said the other day that Xbones strengths are it's games which are spec wise usually technically inferior which kinda makes it seem like phil eats his own hand on that one and is something an executive of a company is going to say when the other team gets a bad review on an exclusive to rally his crew. Xbox exclusives on reviews reach 1 to 1.5 higher on the 1st year of exclusives which everyone knows and as well in the second year that their is never to many amazing games.

That said "Xbones strengths are it's games" is also something someone would say when they are losing in sales globally by around 6 million which doesn't reflect in their sales at all. So that's mostly bullshit. Phil Spencer drinks his own pee, PlayStation forever. Logic.

ScaryMonkey4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Well he has the right to agree with the people he feels are right doesn't he. I mean if you think you're a nice person and five people say you're nice and thirty five people say you're a real a-hole aren't you going to say you feel the five people are right and agree with their opinion. He wasn't scoring his game just stating how he felt about the reviews and to be fair he did say he agreed with the criticism. Would you be more happy if he panned his game like everyone else is trying to do?

steven83r4112d ago

They all do it. It's nice to see a dev defend their work though. And we all do this one form or another. You make something or do something and someone says "meh" and you defend what you had done as awesome.

2pacalypsenow4112d ago

did you even read the article? or just the title

Phar0ahad34112d ago

his unprofessionalism is why i like him hes more outspoken then other game devs and thats awesome he worked hard and he really cares about the score unlike other devs that dont care about the score and invent some corporate drivel for the media

turdburgler10804112d ago

He's probably crying into his protein shake right about now.

alabtrosMyster4112d ago

I think this is kind of weird, but fully warranted given what happened before the game was released.

I think him saying the game deserves an 8 is an admission that they know there are significant areas where their game could be improved, without saying it's negative (6 or 7s are seen as negative by many, too close to failure to warrant respect).

After all, there are things that this game does extremely well, without even playing it or watching a tons of videos people know it's the best looking game ever released, the acting is well recognized as well, the weapons look like they pack a serious punch and the music sound excellent... from what I gathered in what I consider fair reviews, the action is often cut off by cut scenes, especially in the first half, there are button prompts all over the place, etc. how does this bother one person or another?

This is where things get arguable, I know a friend of mine who would probably not even play the first hour, he never played much of the final fantasy games, even back in the SNES/PS1 days because he could not tolerate the dialogs... I on the other hand could love it (I have not received it yet, so honestly I don't know exactly where it will fall)... so I don't expect another Uncharted/God of War or TLoU level of appreciation, but I know it will fall betweek 6 and 8 if I had to use a scale... scores below it are likely to be unfair and almost trollish... above it, well, who knows, the reviewers got scared of Andrea's big arms?

Dee_914112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

So at what point did it become "weird" or "pathetic" to review your own product? And why?
I can see if he said " this game deserves 10's all around!"..
It seems to me that you don't really know how you're suppose to feel because him supposedly reviewing his game isn't normal so you decided to feel offended..

When I read the title, I was more so surprised by the fact he didn't give it a 10.. thats what seem "unprofessional" to me considering that he's suppose to be trying to sale his product..

Hitman07694112d ago

Yeah, this is slightly unprofessional behavior... and you must not be paying attention, one of the Watch Dogs devs did a similar thing basically insulting anybody who gave his game a perfect score lol... They need to just make their games and shut up.

Prime1574112d ago

So, if someone asks the dev questions, you know, like in the interview that Eurogamer said this was... and when they respond to said questions it's them reviewing their game? I don't know how you jumped there.

You never stop leaving me bewildered in your interpretations, nick. Especially since they're just 100% out of context, which means they sure as hell aren't right.

alabtrosMyster4111d ago

Go read the article, this is pretty clear the interviewer said I reviewed the game and gave it an 8 try to convince me to give it a 9....

He then explained that they could not put everything they wanted in, and that 8 sounded about right (also he said everything they did put in was really well crafted).

That seems like an answer as honest as one could give, given how the question was framed.

hanaghansarah4110d ago

You would if you had the chance though wouldn't you.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 4110d ago
gameseveryday4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Ready At Dawn should stop speaking to the press. The game is out there and let the quality speak for itself. Andrea's comments will add more fuel to fire.

Andrea, work on a sequel and implement what you learned from the game instead of discussing what score your game should get.

Malphite4112d ago

I agree. However I think it's hard to stay neutral when you've worked on a game for so much time and see it get so much negative feedback from the press especially with all the hate the game got pre-release. I can definately understand that he tries to defend it.

I think he should try to focus on the positive feedback while keeping constructice criticism in mind and hope that it sells well enough for Sony to greenlight a sequel.

Prime1574112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

Well said, malphite.

I was worried I would hate the game after the reviews I read, but I could tell that the premise was something I would enjoy. I played for a few hours last night and didn't want to put it down. I don't know why everyone wants to hate it.

Yeah, it's a little slower than some 3rd person shooters, but by no means does it warrant a 5-6.

I'll take it over a broken game any day..

bangoskank4112d ago

If he really believes this game is worthy of an 8 rating out of 10 and thinks that QTE's are a fun and enjoyable game mechanic then his studio has no hope of creating a good game. Hopefully he wakes up from his delusions. This game has an awesome setting with amazing potential. I would be really excited to hear that a sequel with actual gameplay was being made.

alabtrosMyster4112d ago

They should have put the number in the reviewer's guide!

PaulFiend4112d ago

"...8 is the right score..."
Being PlayStation fan myself even I cannot, unfortunately, agree with that statement.

SoapShoes4112d ago

Well I can. A 7 or 8. Glad I bit the bullet and got it anyway, didn't listen to what people are saying online. It's enjoyable, I've played worse games that have been highly rated.

mkis0074112d ago

me too, I wavered in the finally 24 hours, but went and bought it because I like that kind of game. Have not been disappointed.

PaulFiend4112d ago

Don't get me wrong I enjoyed graphics and even story but the gameplay was too easy for me (I've beaten all GeoW and Uncharted games at their max. unlockable difficulty levels) and too short also.
6/10 I reckon.

With all due respect I'm sure we'll get even better games from RaD in the future, no doubts about it!

bouzebbal4112d ago

same here. I played GTA :/
never finished one of these...

Man-Eee-Faces4112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

In other news, The producers of Superman 64 also think it should score a 50 too instead of a 20% overall at metacritics.

In all fairness, he is just marketing and saying good things for his game so there is nothing wrong with that. Unfortunately, most reviewers don't feel that way.

G20WLY4112d ago

What about the gamers - do we count?

Death4112d ago

Gamers count more than critics. This is one of the games where critics and gamers seem to agree. http://www.metacritic.com/g...

G20WLY4111d ago (Edited 4111d ago )

^Lol, yeah okay mate, now you're getting desperate! Metacritic user reviews? Look at all the zeros - do you reckon they're honest opinions? Nope. You're smarter than that (I think)...

Death4111d ago

I don't think the zeros or the 10's are "honest" reviews. The averages for both critics and users filter out the extremes. That is the way the law of averages seems to work.

G20WLY4111d ago (Edited 4111d ago )

Do you understand the principle of equal and opposite? Only if there are the same amount of 10's and 0's will they cancel each other out. Assuming you haven't checked, you're actually supporting my point of view.

Using your law of averages every game would get a 5, or close to it. How does that support your notion that the data you're using gives us the true gamer view?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4111d ago
LoveSpuds4112d ago

Perhaps you should read the article instead of just the headline.

DigitalRaptor4112d ago

In other news, you haven't even played the game and are on every of its articles.

You haven't even read this article. SMH.

Gore-Content4112d ago

Sorry, but no. Beat the game and it was not an 8. I think the devs should really take those (contructive) criticisms to heart, rather than shrugging it off. I know there were lots of sh'tty trollish opinions about this game, but they should listen to constructive criticisms so they can make better games in the future.

Spotie4112d ago

Agreed with what? That you beat the game and it wasn't an eight for you, either?

I haven't beaten it yet, but I'd give it just under an eight so far. Video games are about an escape from reality: The Order creates such a complete escape for me that I sometimes forget I'm playing.

No, not because I'm sitting there doing nothing or any such troll reasoning. Rather, it's because it's often so seamless that I can tell only that I'm experiencing it. Only when I pause to do something else do I really notice that, yes, the game is very narrow, or that the black bars are even there.

I guess that's because I'm not expecting it to be something else.

christocolus4112d ago

@spotie

I am agreeing with basically everything he said,unlike most of you( who haven't even played it but yet defend it to high heavens).I am playing the game and i beleve the criticisms are spot on. Same thing happened with ryse but you all were ok with the reviews and attacked every xbox fan who said anything remotely positive about that game. Isn't it embarrassing to see the same people doing 180s now? Ryse was beautiful, great story,short had qtes and mp yet it got a meta of 60 and now the order sits at 65 having all the qualities stated above (excluding mp).both games have some major flaws( and people need to accept that).the game has been released and the critics have given their verdict..what you do next is your cup of tea. its your choice.

moegooner884112d ago (Edited 4112d ago )

The design of the game is fine. It is exactly what the previews showed it to be. Having spent plenty of time playing it, I wouldn't want RAD to change the formula. We have different genres and formulas out there, some will appeal to others and some won't. However making it " not linear " and changing the formula isn't valid. You didn't like it, move on, others like myself did and appreciated the story driven experience. Video games nowdays are becoming more and more like carbon copies of each other with different paint coats.

CanadianTurtle4112d ago

@moegooner88

Opinions like yours is why developers get away with mediocre games. You are promoting mediocrity.

moegooner884112d ago

@CanadianT I have been gaming since the nineties and I enjoyed plenty of games the critics didn't. It is called having an opinion. If people wanna hate on the game without trying it. Their loss really. Your comment is funny thu. Will give you that.

Show all comments (142)
210°

The Order: 1886 Sequel Would Have Featured Larger-Scale Battles & Multiplayer

A sequel to Sony and Ready At Dawn's action-adventure game, The Order: 1886, would have featured larger-scale battles as well as multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
pwnmaster3000365d ago

I missed it when games use to have a multiplayer to them.
Hope Sony revives the game at one point

KyRo364d ago

Killzone, Resistance, Uncharted, TLOU, Motorstorm. Great times. Its a shame how far they've fallen this generation

Muigi364d ago

Oh they still do…its just the whole game now 😂.

-Foxtrot365d ago

Why add multiplayer when the single player (despite enjoying it for what it was) had flaws?

You'd work out the issues with how you craft the single player then once you’ve perfected it do multiplayer after.

RaidenBlack365d ago

https://www.videogameschron...
"Two sequels were planned for the franchise, The Order 1891 and The Order 1899. While the third game was never in development, Weerasuriya says he had planned where the story of the franchise was planned to go, if he had been able to develop the full trilogy."
...
Alas, we'll also might never get the PC version of 1886, which is currently residing in some dev's hard drive, nearly ready for a release if required.

Charal365d ago

It’s a shame we didn’t gave its chance to this franchise.
Game world was very interesting, and gameplay could have evolved to a major hit with sequels.
Not even speaking about graphics that were way ahead of their time.

Reaper22_364d ago (Edited 364d ago )

If "we" is sony, i agree. I liked the game but it was metacritic that contributed to it's death. It's a shame.

AshleeEmerson364d ago

No, we are "us," the gamers who rated it so low on Metacritic, hurting... Killing its sales. I agree it is a shame. I loved this game.

Charal364d ago

No it is not, it is us has a community which crucified this game, which is happening much too often.

CrimsonWing69365d ago (Edited 365d ago )

I think MP being co-op would’ve been awesome. Essentially, I always viewed this as Sony’s take on the Gears series.

However, it really failed to measure up to what I expected. I definitely saw the potential but there were some things that really bogged it down for me like the forced slow walking segments (which I know was to hide loading), the repetitive warehouse werewolf fights, not enough variety in enemies, oddly we fought more humans than Darkstalkers, and the stealth sections were infuriating.

One thing there’s no denying though, this damn game was a looker. Such a shame at the wasted potential.

Show all comments (16)
120°

The Order: 1886, a Ten Year Reunion

WTMG's Leo Faria: "After finally playing the now decade-old The Order: 1886, what do I think about it? Is it really worthy of all the hate it has received over the past decade? Or is it some kind of hidden gem? I honestly think it falls somewhere in the middle. I loved the setting, the story is initially fine, the combat isn’t half-bad, and the potential for some awesome world building was there. It was all bogged down by too much ambition against a tight deadline, as well as poor marketing. As a result, it’s short, full of plotholes, infested with QTEs, and not exactly memorable as a whole. As a game you can grab for less than ten bucks today, I absolutely think it’s worth checking out. It’s one hell of a wasted potential, but for such a discount, I had some fun with it, and I’m sure you will too."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
SimpleSlave461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

Great setting, great graphics, even decent gun play, but what a trash of a game. The fuck were these people thinking? We could've had something like an Alan Wake 2 meets Mass Effect 2 style game. With investigations, creepy locations to uncover and explore, people to talk to and even recruit, clues to uncover and connect, monsters to slay, side quests to get lost in, and a more expansive lore to go with it.

Instead we got a shitty AAAAAAAAA Third Person Pew Pew snoozfest. Awesome.

_SilverHawk_461d ago

The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games I'd put the last of us 2, the order 1886, days gone, horizon zero dawn and God of war.

SimpleSlave461d ago

"The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games..."

Jesus H. Christ, bud. You just sound like a Sony apologist. What the fuck? Anyways. Good luck with that or whatever.

coolbeans461d ago

God. The "what could've been" you're describing would've been way better than just being the most empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation.

SimpleSlave461d ago

Right? I mean, I can understand people enjoying this thing ironically. Knowing that it sucks but still enjoying it for what it is. I get that. That's fine. We all have our guilty pleasure no doubt. But to come here and actually pretend that this is a top 5 PS4 game? Wow!

To pretend that this barely there game is anything more than an "empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation," as you said, is beyond ridiculous. But I guess Self-Awareness is some expensive ass DLC still.

Espangerish461d ago

I really enjoyed this game and also think it was one of the best PS4 games. It’s weird to me that this makes you so angry. I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player.

SimpleSlave460d ago

"and also think it was one of the best PS4 games"
"I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player."

Yeah, OK. You want to lie to yourself? You do you, bud. But like I said to the other Sony apologist, "good luck with that or whatever."

-Foxtrot460d ago

Jesus, it had some flaws but you're acting like it was unplayable.

It built a foundation, a rocky one but a sequel is where they could have refined things.

Personally my only issue is I feel like the "Gears of War" like over the shoulder gameplay, especially getting into cover and the like didn't really fit the game as much. In Gears you understand that kind of gameplay because they are wearing super heavy amour and guns but in the Order these guys are super human, they should feel more of a breeze to control, easily jumping over things and being allowed to climb whatever similar to Uncharted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 460d ago
Inverno461d ago

Im back again to simp for The Order, if ya like games well grounded in their reality with consistency in everything it does then I recommend it if ya haven't played it. Play it thru emulation or on your PS it don't matter just play it.

1nsomniac461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

A great game run down by the media for it's price vs length - Which was understandable, but it shouldn't of been the be all and end all.

At the right price this was a great game & deserved a sequel!

thorstein461d ago

Exactly. What a weird metric that suddenly was important and then, within a few months, no longer mattered.

andy85461d ago

I enjoyed this. I think the complaints were the length if I remember. Nothing wrong with a short good game, at least to physical copy owners 😅

Rebel_Scum461d ago

Put the thing on PS plus already!

Show all comments (16)
310°

The Order: 1886 Dev Pitched a Sequel to Sony, But Was Denied

Co-founder thinks bad reviews were to blame.
Ready at Dawn co-founder has revealed the now-shuttered studio pitched a sequel to PS4 exclusive The Order: 1886 to Sony, but was denied the chance to make it.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
_SilverHawk_471d ago

I can't believe sony turned down a sequel to the order 1886 which ended basically on a cliffhanger. The game is amazing and I would love a ps5 pro enhanced version just like I'd like a driveclub ps5 pro enhanced version.

DodoDojo471d ago

About 2 million sales and not the greatest of reviews, I can believe it.

Tbh there's a lot of dormant Sony exclusives that are more deserving of a sequel.

ravens52471d ago

Have you played it? Just curious.

ABizzel1471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

2 million probably wasn’t enough to make a strong profit on, and the mid reviews didn’t help, even though it was a solid game just short, and could have expanded way more on the creature mythos.

Days Gone: +7 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Infamous SS: 6 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Killzone SF: +2 million (4 mo.) / mid reviews (no sequel)
Driveclub: +2 million (2015 / leaks say 5m) / mid reviews (no sequel)

Basically it looks like for the PS4 generation budgets were getting out of control and Sony made the decision

sales + reviews - budget = sequel or no sequel

goken470d ago

Whatever the number, can’t be worst than concord

SimpleDad470d ago

Glad that Alloy Lego is doing great.

Toecutter00470d ago

Two million in sales for a new IP is pretty impressive. The world-building was in a class on its own. Any moron could see this IP had mad potential and the fact that Sony balked on it makes one question their competence and leadership.

Cacabunga470d ago

Nothing to do with sales. It’s all about the broken vision that Sony is having lately.
Days Gone sold great but they still don’t want a sequel to it.
Sony wants Easy money and they saw it in gaas and lazy games like lego horizon and countless remasters..

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 470d ago
pwnmaster3000471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

Idky you can’t believe it.
This game was shitted on by everyone besides some PS fans.

Don’t blame Sony on this one. Blame everyone who wanted to see this burn. Sony does a lot of stupid shit with their IP and waste a lot of them like bloodborne and days gone, but don’t be surprised with this one.

Outside_ofthe_Box471d ago

Exactly. I came to post exactly this. The game was torn apart upon release. It's not shocking that a sequel was denied.

S2Killinit471d ago

Not “upon” release. There was a whole campaign “prior” to release.

In my opinion they should have made it a bit less linear and it would have been great. I did enjoy it. But the reception it got makes sense that Sony wouldnt want to risk a sequel if it was going to open up a can of worms with people who wanted the first one to fail.

470d ago
Christopher470d ago

I played the game. I 100% believe Sony turned down a sequel.

blackblades470d ago

Well pretty obvious when it was left on a cliffhanger. Many sequels get turned from companies as someone else said above blame the SOB's that always whining.

Sabbath1313470d ago

i 100% agree with you, both of those games were amazing

Bathyj470d ago

What's so hard to believe? Don't you remember this game was crucified by the media.. it was DOA. It's a shame because it was a really fresh new IP it was gorgeous and a play really well . it had some issues but it wasn't the only game with qte repeated bosses and a playtime under 10 hours.

TheEroica470d ago ShowReplies(2)
mkis007470d ago (Edited 470d ago )

It was panned because of the graphics hype. Kind of similar to Ryse and hellblade 2...although the story was pretty interesting in all 3.

As a matter of fact I think Indy's success is partially due to the fact the graphics were not hyped up pre launch.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 470d ago
-Foxtrot471d ago

It’s strange though Sony would be so proud about their work and overall quality but wouldn’t give them an extra year to, give them that quality.

Anyway he talks about if it was in the 70s they’d have had their sequel but Days Gone is at 71 on Metacritic and we don’t have a sequel.

Both games should have one, I think they deserve a second chance at refining and building onto that foundation already laid out.

neutralgamer1992471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

Definitely days gone 2 should happen. Who knows maybe now Sony will let them make it since bend had to cancel its live service game. Days gone 2 for PS6 sounds amazing

As far as order 1886 sequel it would be have been interesting. I think if this game was a RPG with 15 hour story it would have done so much better. Don't get me wrong game is great but you can tell the potential is there if they were allowed to make some drastic changes

Sadly this new Sony is not the PlayStation they are suits and spreadsheet guys. Playstation has lost its touch with gamers. I miss Shawn jack Andrew house etc

At the launch of PS4 Playstation was at its full strength with gamers running the company but not anymore. No we have a guy who loves horizon above every thing else and is willing to fund projects based on that IP

Redemption-64471d ago

So an IP that actually sell? Sony moved away from the type of games you saw during the launch of the PS4 because many gamer didn't support them. I hear people crying more about say Japan Studio closing than actually supporting their games when they were open. Wasn't it shawn layden who said many of these games fail and you hope a few like horizon to make up for the failed games. Maybe if gamers actually supported these games there would be more of them. Shocking right?

Redemption-64471d ago

There is no sequel for Days Gone because it didn't sell. The director himself said "If you love a game, buy it at f****** full price. I can't tell you how many times I've seen gamers say 'yeah, I got that on sale, I got it through PS Plus, whatever'.”

Majority of the sales from days gone came from when it was heavily discounted, and I have seen many gamers say they will not pay full price or the game isn't worth full price, but they will buy it when it's discounted. Yet they get triggered when the studio decides to move away from a game they refused to support at full price

jwillj2k4471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

What this is showing is that the majority of people don’t like the price. It doesn’t mean they don’t like the game. Two different dimensions.

Example: The company Take Two took advantage by selling NBA 2K at $20, completely undercutting NBA live to become the most popular basketball game. High priced games isn’t the only way they can make money.

-Foxtrot470d ago

Well. If we are going to go off that director apparently Days Gone hit 8 million sales around the same time frame that Ghost of Tsushima later did.

https://x.com/JakeRocket/st...

One was considered a failure, the other a massive success so I don't think it just boils down to sales.

Redemption-64470d ago

@Foxtrot

Hey, maybe you clearly know more than the director/writer. If memory serves me right, Days Gone went on sale faster than Ghost. Also, please know budget is a major factor. There is a huge difference between Ghost with a budget of $60M selling 8M, vs Days Gone, with a budget of $250M selling 8M after major price cut. One can be considered a success, because it had a much lower budget.

Don't Complain If a Game Doesn’t Get a Sequel” If You Didn’t Buy It “At F-cking Full Price, clearly shows the game didn't make the money it needed to make within the time frame it needed

Redemption-64470d ago

@jwillj2k4

What is shows is majority of gamers didn't think Days Gone was worth the $60 price tag and clearly Sony agrees with them. You can like a game, but if you don't think it is worth the price tag, why do you complain when the company decides to not invest in a game you don't think is worth what they are charging? They should release the game, lose money, cut the price and then you will support it?

jwillj2k4469d ago

Reading is fundamental. I said start with a reduced price not cut the price after you’ve already released it. It was an example to show how there are other ways they couldn’t make money. The idea is that number of buyers is much greater at $20 than $60. I didn’t think I had the point that out to you.

Redemption-64469d ago (Edited 469d ago )

@jwillj2k4

The number of buyers being greater at $20 than $60 does not equate to more money. You literally have to sell 2-3 times more to makeup the difference. Starting with a reduced price for an AAA that costs say $250M is pure stupidity and again would have to sell 2-4 times more depending on the reduced price break even. Or include micro transactions. They can make it into a free live service game with mtx. Yeah, you are right, maybe they should follow the route 2K NBA took

Clearly many don't think the game is worth $60. Who knows maybe the remaster can give it hope. But it would be funny if they get a sequel and people refuse to buy it at full price. Highly doubt those who think the game isn't worth 60, will be lining up for 70.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 469d ago
S2Killinit471d ago

Days Gone deserved so much better than 71. I’ve noticed that some PlayStation games get attacked and it feels generated. Like money is behind the hate campaign.

-Foxtrot470d ago

Days Gone was that one game which wasn't really attacked by gamers but by journalists.

As soon as it was revealed they really didn't like it for some reason, it was made out to be because it came across as a generic looking open world game or another generic "zombie" game but at the time we had plenty of open world games and a fair few "zombie/infected" games that these journalists didn't bad an eyelid towards.

When the game released broken before the Day One patch it just gave these journalists a massive excuse to slaughter the game in their reviews.

On one hand, a game shouldn't have released in that broken state or at least they shouldn't have given journalists a copy without the Day One patch HOWEVER these are the same journalists who usually gloss over that kind of stuff with so many other games, take Star Wars Outlaws for example, the game was a buggy, broken mess at launch with plenty of issues, bad AI, some clear performance issues and a lot of quality of life improvements needed but it still did a lot better than Days Gone at launch.

Personally I think they knew they could get away with it more because Sony Bend weren’t that high up and respectable, they knew calling their game out as much as they did wouldn't hit them with any major consequences unlike if they hypothetically were like this towards NaughtyDog, Sony Santa Monica or Insomniac.

RaidenBlack471d ago

Yea and there was/is a PC version of 1886 too in 2016 ... but now maybe collecting dust in some dev's hardrive.

Relientk77471d ago

That's lame. It's not perfect, definitely a flawed game, but deserves a sequel. You already have the first game as a starting point just need to improve upon it. This could have been a much better sequel like the jump from Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed 2. The IP has potential.

S2Killinit471d ago

But Assassins Creed sold a lot.

Show all comments (57)