What kind of retarded title is that ?

That comparison oozes of ignorance, no offence to the author of this article. This is just my thought.

How does one compare RPG mechanics to that of an action game?

No shit it's not like Batman..to tell you the truth even though i'm a huge batman fan and i'm really looking forward to Arkham knight the witcher's combat to me is far better due to the fact that you have to prepare for Each fight and really learn and research what your going after, with is kinda funny how Geralt is closer to batman then batman himself is. batman's combat is not really fluid you just point the stick towards a bad guy and press the attack button and batman just trows himself in that Direction so it's kinda like an odd game of ping pong.

It might not be Arkham City, but it sure look more than good enough.

PFFT Batman ? It's a beat'em up, the game almost does the combat for you and you press two buttons almost 90% of the time while in combat.

IMO it doesn't need to be like Batman , I want it to play like a proper action RPG.

I don't want it to be the same as Batman AC which was impressive but at least it should be as good as Batman AC's system.

I love the Batman franchise and the combat. But I also loved witcher 2. My only issue with the witcher combat is the lack of fluidity when using signs. It annoys me you have to pause the game to change which sign to use. Batman has an extremely layered and complex combat system if you understand how to use it. I think that is the reason why it has inspired several games. Shadows of mordor had the flow and layer, never needing the player to stop to make changes during combat. I hoped this flow would be added to witcher 3. But I still think I'm gonba love it nonetheless. Just wont be using a large variety of signs.

Over 50% is PC. RE9 was the same

From this moment henceforth, Xbox hardware shall simply just exist but have no significant bearing from a business standpoint or from a gamer culture standpoint. It will simply be there for the people that want to have it and that's fine if they're selling it at a high price and actually making money off each sale.

But they should never ever again be Xbox fanboys anymore than they should be Lenovo laptop fanboys it's just a piece of hardware that exists to serve a purpose for niche group of people.

I’ll say this. Cyberpunk had a tumultuous start on console. Even if it had sold like crazy, that whole almost unplayable fiasco and being given no questions asked refunds made a lot of people not look back.
When it comes to PC, people are a lot more forgiving of things like that, especially on Steam, because of the return policy. I really think console manufacturers should implement the exact same refund policy. Was it played under X time? Refund it. It makes people take that risk on games a LOT more than on console. Bought this game and it was broken? Refund it. They said they fixed it 3 months later? Buy it again. It’s fixed but just not fun? Refund it. On console you don’t have that luxury. Was it downloaded? GG. No refund. Lord knows my Steam library is full of “I’ll try it” games that I loved and I’m glad I can take a rush on. On console, specifically PlayStation because I’m not buying Xbox games, I take calculated risk. Known developers. Shinobi, Ninja Gaiden ragebound, stuff like that. Obviously big exclusives and games too. I would have never tried Little Bookstore on PlayStation, but on Steam… why not? Hellish Quart? Why not. Buckshot Roulette? Why not.

this is why console sales matter, folks.

Never gonna complain at this especially as I havent played the PS5 version yet. Give me a Pro patch 😂😂

They're finally fixing the godawful inventory system? Yes!