All Channels
Popular
100°

Nintendo Really Likes Metacritic

Kotaku:
At an investor's meeting today, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata talked a lot about how great Nintendo's Metacritic scores are—even going as far as to brag that Nintendo's current releases have higher Metacritic numbers than Sony's or Microsoft's.

Um, congrats?

Keep in mind that Iwata is talking to boring investor types. That, and this Metacritic chest thumping is depressing.

Neonridr4115d ago

lol.. sure Metacritic is broken when games that are expected to score highly don't. But games like TLOU, GTA V, Mario Kart 8 show why Metacritic is justifiable.

Great games will have great Metacritic scores.

Aloy-Boyfriend4115d ago

The Only thing broken on Metacritic is the user scores.

Christopher4115d ago

Just because I get the answer right half the time doesn't mean I'm working as intended.

Neonridr4115d ago

What I am saying is, games that received universal praise (The Last of Us, GTA V, Zelda games, Mario Kart, etc etc) have high Metacritic scores. Those scores are justifiable in that they back up the claims that the game is in fact fantastic.

But games that are divisive or debatable as to their merit, usually have Metacritic scores to reflect as much.

Just because a game receives a 75 Metacritic score doesn't mean the game sucks, it just means that it isn't universally considered a great game.

But using the Metacritic excuse when a game scores lower than expected (Driveclub for example) is just acting a little sore in my opinion.

Christopher4115d ago

***What I am saying is, games that received universal praise (The Last of Us, GTA V, Zelda games, Mario Kart, etc etc)***

I'd say some of that highlights major issues in the industry. Some games are rated on how much they evolve, whereas some get a free pass for putting out the same thing over and over. Metacritic doesn't show how things are rated evenly. They show how biased people are towards certain IPs and how inconsistent we are about reviewing games.

Furthermore, it is utilized by publishers to reward developers. But, who will take risks when taking risks isn't rewarded most of the time in scores whereas taking no risks is oftentimes rewarded the most.

Neonridr4115d ago

@Christopher - fair enough, but that still doesn't mean that those games I listed aren't fantastic games that should be a part of anyone's libraries.

Christopher4115d ago

@Neonridr: Eh, we'll agree to disagree on some of those mentioned.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4115d ago
OrangePowerz4115d ago (Edited 4115d ago )

There are a number of things that are broken with
metacritic. The first one being the user scores, they mainly range from 0-1 and from 9-10 everything between doesn't really exist for the most part. It also allows anybody to make reviews not requiring the user to play the game because it can't be verified. It's not like on Amazon where you can see reviews of people that actually bought the product or Steam where it tells you how much time the person spent with the game.

Another issue is that the websites are in a Tier. So IGN reviews are more valid compared to smaller websites because the score from IGN has a higher weighting to it, meaning basically that the scores from smaller sites are downgraded and if they give a game 9/10 the system will not see it as a 9/10 and instead it will be lower.

You also have the issue that companies use Metacritic to to give out or hold back on bonuses, but that's a general issue with the industry because too much put into what random number a game gets instead of how well it's received by users and how much it sells.

3-4-54115d ago

* When you have 15-20 Reviews that have 9/10, and one person has to be the "journalist" who gives it a 1/10 to justify some agenda they are pushing.

^ That is the one scenario that keeps Metacritic from being as good as it could be.

It's still a legit way to see how good a game could potentially be though, but you need to make up your own mind.

deafdani4114d ago

That's unavoidable, but seriously, that's not a fault from Metacritic's part. Anyway, when a game gets forty reviews scored 9 out of 10 and higher, having a single unpopular guy scoring it 4 out of 10 won't really affect the overall score that much.

wonderfulmonkeyman4115d ago

Yeah, this is just another case of someone who hates Nintendo using whatever excuse they can find to justify their own "chest thumping" in this ridiculous console war BS.

roboshort4115d ago

A lot of time this may be the case, but great games will not always have great metacritic scores. Professional reviewers are just as prone to biases and trends as users are, like these days docking a game for being linear or being too short. Some games that aren't regarded that highly today may one day be critically acclaimed (like Majora's Mask or Wind Waker) and vice-versa.

Spotie4114d ago

A few right examples don't negate the wrong ones. Even with the games you mention, there will be examples of troll reviews that shouldn't be included, but are.

Neonridr4114d ago

troll reviews perhaps under the user scores. But if you look at the "professional" reviews, you will see the scores are a little streamlined.

I could list probably 100 more, but I was only throwing out some more recent games.

No it is not perfect, but it can work as intended when you come across a real turd or a real gem. It's the split-camp games where Metacritic can go awry.

But at the end of the day it's all about your own tastes and preferences.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4114d ago
Concertoine4115d ago (Edited 4115d ago )

Obviously because metacritic likes nintendo. They're the only publisher last year that came out with games that weren't broken or unfinished. I dont really get the Metacritic hate. You can hate on people who judge purely by metacritic, but thats not the sites fault. Seeing 50 or so different opinions on a game, theyre usually indicative of the quality of the game regardless of whether or not you personally like it.

The only exception are obviously reviews blatantly motivated by ad revenue, such as ME3, or Titanfall. Those are easy to point out though.

Is this only news now that nintendo is behind in sales? Because theyve been mentioning metacritic for years now.

OrangePowerz4115d ago (Edited 4115d ago )

What exactly is wrong so majorly wrong with ME3. Don't give me that entitled crap about how Bioware betrayed the consumers and made a completely useless ending.

It wasn't a perfect game, but it's an example for where the community went overboard with demands and petitions and feeling all entitled. The ending I got suited my choices and was satisfying. Wasn't the best ending in gaming, but by far not as bad as people made it out to be.

Concertoine4115d ago

Well, i didnt very much like ME2, and it was a continuation of that in terms of gameplay. I feel the same way about ME1 to ME2 to ME3 as i do System Shock 2 to Bioshock to Infinite. Things kept getting more and more basic in terms of gameplay, but the praise kept coming and i was never sure why.

So in addition to the crappy ending, which did feel rushed and crappy, the gameplay as a whole gradually melted into every other TPS on the market across the series. IMHO

But if you liked the game, good for you.

wonderfulmonkeyman4115d ago

In a game where character and plot development is made a big focus to the player's experience, a set of endings that almost entirely ignores all the work the player put in, is one of the worst things you can create.
Out of all of them, the only half-way decent ending was the one where Shepherd survives, and even that is fraught with issues pertaining to past selections being ignored.

Moonman4115d ago

As they should. Not only do they not release shoddy/shady software, they are not afraid to get reviewed sometimes weeks before their games get released.

BigDuo4115d ago (Edited 4115d ago )

While Metacritic's review system is clearly flawed, I don't think it's much of an issue here when Nintendo has proven itself to be one of the most consistently reliable developer's in the industry by critics and consumers with or without basing them on a numerical review scoring system.

This isn't to say that Nintendo doesn't make some bad game design choices in its developed titles. For example, as polished and as fun as Mario Kart 8 is, the battle mode is a disappointment due to the unnecessary changes made to its level design approach.

mikel10154115d ago

Because no other publisher uses or pays attention to metacritic amirite?

Show all comments (31)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7754d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer79d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi78d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer79d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot79d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box78d ago (Edited 78d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno79d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay78d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno77d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK77d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)