That could be because the PS4 version has far more people playing it ... Just a thought. Evolve has sold a lot more on the PS4.

This indecision is complete nonsense. They know full well which version they should be advising people to buy, which is something they did all last generation, but they're now trying to find any reason they can to avoid making that choice. What next? Battery life?

edit: Going by Amazon, the PS4 version was a ahead in sales for quite some time, but then both versions crashed out of the top 20 pretty rapidly.

You could be right I suppose, but it still doesn't change the fact that waiting a little longer to play a game (if that's the case because they use the word 'seem') does not in any way offset a version that looks and performs better.

They moved to framerates after realising the XB1 couldn't compete graphically, even when the difference was only 2 - 3 Frames per second and only occasionally, but now the PS4 actually has both the better graphics AND the more stable framerate, they use a slight difference in the time it takes for matchmaking.

Jesus, come on LOL.

jesus christ, this is digital comedy.
theyre meant to do tech analysis.why is it so important to add a "but xbox....so it doesnt matter' at the end of every advantage ps4 has.
why not just say xbox controller is better and green>blue so xbox is the winner.
the sony hate is just too damn apparent at this point. how can we possibly take EG seriously.
just because the guy testing has connection problems doesnt mean everyone has them.
first the order articles and now this.
during the orders tech analysis they stopped writing about the tech after a paragraph and started talking about how games need to innovate and how the order sucks at it.now everything better on ps4 and they play 'xbl>psn' card so either versions are the same.
how the hell can you include the netcode in an analysis when you have absolutely no way of analyzing it ?
WOW!JUST WOW!
VERY PROFESSIONAL

Eurogamer were always Xbox friendly...since PS3 /X360 era they always find smthing to diminish Playstations results ....

The shadows certainly seem to be missing in the PS4 version in that shot. What's going on there?

*sigh*

right, ballseye... because *one* instance where there are shadows missing = them sacrificing dynamic shadows for a better PS4 resolution... you're grasping at straws. obvious bug in the PS4 version is obvious.

It says right in the article where those pics are that the shadow difference is caused by "Changing lighting and environmental conditions results in variable light and shadow positions across all three platforms."

Its right there in the description, yet you fanboys completely disregard it and just want to push your biased agenda. Well fanboys will be fanboys.

Here's a tip for you: Don't let your bias get the best of you. Think objectively.

For an ONLINE game. The most important aspect of it is the NETCODE. In this case, the PS4's Netcode is the most sub-par of the three. And you expect DF not to mention that in a comparison, so the PS4 version can seem flawless.

DF is not limited to resolution and framerates. They need to inform of us every pro and con related to the games.

"For example, matchmaking is a more inconsistent experience on Sony's system, often leaving you waiting between five and 20 minutes"

That is a big deal. A possible deal-breaker in fact. Although, a fix can be made at a later stage.

You wouldn't know what 'objective' meant. And clearly, neither does Eurogamer. You see in black and white which is why you think my view is biased. It's NOT a biased view, it's a view of fairness and equality. You DO NOT change the goalposts from one generation to the next just because your bias towards one company necessitates it. That is what Eurogamer are doing here and it's the reason they've now become something of a joke on sites like Gaf.

The PS4 runs better and looks better and their view on the online is completely subjective. Many people have had no problems online with the PS4 and conversely, lot's of people have had problems online with the XB1. What does that tell you? It tells you that at any given point one console may 'seem' (the word Eurogamer used) to perform slightly better online.

This is why they avoided 'subjective' information last generation and stuck to graphics and graphics performance. That was the POINT of the site but suddenly they want to include anything they can to downplay the differences and avoid 'advising' people on which version is best.

The bigger majority of multiplatform games ran better on the 360 last generation, that's why I advised my friends to buy a 360 if they were more interested in multiplatform games. As a Sony fan, how the hell could I do that?! (shock/horror). It's called objectivity. I would now advise my friends to buy a PS4 for the same reason.

Don't try to tutor wiser people than yourself on objectivity.

@Gribble

Dude your spin is unbelievable. It's very clear you are biased towards one system. Which is fine, but when you try so hard to spin something in your favor, you just end up looking foolish.

I know what your saying but overall I don't have issues playing online.