All Channels
Popular
70°

Why Nintendo must stay the course with hardware

Wii U and 3DS missed targets, but a future without hardware still looks commercially unappealing for the House of Mario

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
AKR4117d ago

Great article. It'd be devastating for Nintendo to jump ship and try and make a name for themselves on the other systems, especially when the gaming industry is so volatile right now. I have a feeling this is the last generation before another big shift occurs.

Not sure what that shift might be, but, judging by what's been going on, I'd rather them "stay the course" too.

Nevers0ft4117d ago

Agreed. Although I'm sure Nintendo would do pretty well as a 3rd party publisher, I think we're about to see some pretty big shake-ups in the industry. I don't think the current 3rd party AAA situation is sustainable - nearly every major franchise has so much funding thrown at it that just a couple of flops could seriously damage the publisher. The public seems to be getting pretty jaded with the current trend of releasing buggy games with micro-transactions and bullshots up the wazzoo... Something's gotta give. I think Nintendo's best bet is ride it out until we can see what the gaming landscape will be like in a few years.

wonderfulmonkeyman4117d ago

So long as gamers on other systems value Uncharted and Call of Duty more than Mario 3D World and games like Splatoon, Nintendo would do well to steer well clear of trying to go third party.

There's just simply no market for Nintendo on systems where people spend more time laughing and calling their games "rehashed kiddy sh*t" than they do actually giving them an objective look and a fair chance.

pcz4117d ago

i want them to stay but their hardware is so uninspiring lately. the new 3ds looks like a completely pointless addition

Canary4117d ago

Just like the DSi. Or 2DS.

This ain't a new thing. Nintendo is doing this to attract new consumers, not appease existing consumers.

marloc_x4117d ago

I do appreciate the increased computing power.

And as a fan of 3D content, the view tracking is a Huge improvement.

A second analog is hardly pointless..

higgins784117d ago (Edited 4117d ago )

I don't understand. I'm certain that those who troll Nintendo over their hardware run out and buy a PS4 or XB1. I'm sorry, but apart from a few buzzwords and propaganda, Sony and Microsoft have done very little in real terms demonstrating their hardware is anything more than a gimped PC. I say this owning a Wii U and PS4. The best games for my PS4 have been either 'remasters' - games I have played and bought previous, or the occasional multiplatform - games I can buy cheaper on run better on my modest PC.

Many now will be asking, "well why did you buy a PS4"!? You got me. Please, please stop painting either PS4 or XB1 as the holy grail of hardware. The truth is (at present) all 3 major consoles run games at HD and at 60fps...well, at least one of them does.

pcz4117d ago

i dont care about the ps4 or x1, but since you mention them, at least they go some way to give you technology you would consider 'cutting edge.' again, i dont care for ps4 or x1 but they are attractive pieces of hardware. to think of what could be possible on those platforms excites you and stirs your imagination. the tech is at the forefront so there will always be an element of surprise.

the same is not true of the new 3ds. i was very disappointed to see how xenoblade looked on it. it looked horrible. the graphical leap is so small as to be redundant. why do they even bother?

the same is also true of wiiu, we all know what we can expect from wiiu even when pushed to the max because the tech is a generation old and everyone knows what a ps3/60 is capable of. wiiu is not charting any new territory, its just treading over the already worn path.

it seems this is nintendo's new market strategy, and it is also why the prospect of a new nintendo console doesnt excite me. yes, i will still watch with interest, but i know they are going to come with retro tech and just pair it with a gimmick.

Rebel_Scum4117d ago

@PCZ: I wouldn't say pointless, but more this is what they should've released in the first place.

R00bot4117d ago

The New 3DS is exactly what people like you have been asking for, now that it's been made you backflip. There's almost nothing Nintendo can do to get you to change your mind.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4117d ago
Hereiamhereibe24117d ago

Xbox should make a PC gaming platform, Nintendo should solely focus on handhelds and Playstation should be the only Console platform. These changes i feel would better the gaming community as a whole. People are so divided these days.

OrangePowerz4117d ago

Well their revenue since a while is bolstered by having people buy their second, third or fourth 3DS. They should stay in the hardware business, but they should seriously reevaluate their approach. They got lucky with the Wii and it's gimmicky Remote. The 3DS, while not a bad device, has poor hardware capabilities and the WiiU tried to replicate the success of the Wii with another gimmicky controler and failed.

I know that they try to be special and distance themselves from the other consoles because the N64 and GC didn't sell that well, but they need to up their game and start developing again up to date hardware instead of relying on gimmicks.

superchiller4117d ago

"Stay the course"? Not if that means they should keep making underpowered, feature-lacking hardware with bad gimmicks forced into them, the last two home consoles from Nintendo have been terrible.

If they actually do produce a successor to the Wii U, which isn't certain at all, let's hope they drop the gimmicks and just focus on solid gaming hardware. Their gimmicks have really damaged their reputation badly, and ruined their chances to succeed this generation.

marloc_x4117d ago

Nintendo'$ gimmick$ have really damaged their reputation badly, and ruined their chance$ to $ucceed thi$ generation.

;)

GokuSolosAll4117d ago

3rd Party Nintendo would be the best. Imagine Sony pumping out hardcore versions of their IP on beautiful PS5 instead of allowing Nintendo to casualize their awesome IP into the ground for their next underpowered system held back byba gimmick.

Nintendo is like Sega. They'll be good as 3rd Party (though Sega should make Dreamcast 2).

diepdiep4117d ago

"Nintendo is like Sega. They'll be good as 3rd Party"

Yes, because Sega is doing SO well recently.

Amorist894117d ago (Edited 4117d ago )

Sorry yet poor hardware arguement is gone passed overused especially when the software has been outstanding on the system. It's true that graphical and performance lacks longevity in light of the competition.

Nintendo has had signs of great success when they've applied marketing focus, but those instances are few and far between. The problem with the video game outlook as of late stems from the Wii U launch as players were waiting for the grass to be greener on the other side with PS4 and XB1.

Throughout 2014 PS4 + XB1 gamers including me were waiting yet again for the grass to be greener on the other side in 2015. All the while Nintendo had delivered consistent quality last year, which the Wii U feels a more justifiable purchase.

The other two systems personally do not and can shamefully say i purchased them to soon, my own stupid mistake.

Morale of the rambling; hardware is not really the point here, it's whats produced with the resources available. Some games score critical acclaim that could probably run smooth on older systems in regards to specifictions, such as popular indy titles.

Nintendo needs to stay the course with hardware and aim to confront the negative stigma that keeps gamers commiting to the Sony or Microsoft comfort zone. Power is nothing without control or direction.

Dont get me wrong I do want all systems to deliver, Nintendo needs to play the game differently and to emphasise strength within their weaknesses.

Show all comments (19)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7738d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer63d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi62d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer63d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot63d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno63d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay63d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno61d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK62d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)