All Channels
Popular
120°

Should Sony Develop A New ‘Resistance’ Game For PS4?

Any gamer who picked up the PS3 during its first months of release likely played Resistance: Fall of Man. Insomniac Games’ alternate history shooter was something of a treat – a rare launch title that actually showed potential, even if it did have some faults.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
masterfox4125d ago

Yes please, and revive Nathan hale dammit!!!!!!!!! and the game has to have the same mechanics as the first one, and you will have an instant winner Sony!!!!

JoGam4125d ago

Should Insomniac make it?

Angels37854125d ago (Edited 4125d ago )

Insomniac since ratchet and clank has proven to be a troubled slightly above average developer. Their bread and butter is ratchet and clank they should stick with it. Resistance was their first real jump into creating a good IP but despite each resistance I couldnt help but feel like the games would be better in different hands.

ddkshah4125d ago (Edited 4125d ago )

angels3785

IMO Sunset Overdrive was one of insomniac's best games and for me put them back on my fav devs. list

Angels37854125d ago (Edited 4125d ago )

^^^

That doesn't excuse their 4 previous mediocre titles.
Even a broken clock is right 2 times a day

Not to mention the fact that sunset overdrive's gameplay formula...feel familiar??

Maddens Raiders4125d ago (Edited 4125d ago )

Hands down, this series was one of my fav's to play on the good 'ol PS3 and I was sad to see it go. Wish it would make a comeback and yeah Insomniac making it would be the icing on the cake but not sure if that can happen now. So much endless potential in this series. I'm surprised it isn't a movie.

BattleAxe4125d ago

Releasing the first 3 games onto the Playstation Store for PS3 might be a good start.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4125d ago
spicelicka4125d ago

I think resistance 3 had the best campaign. They should keep the controls and campaign like resistance 3 with more open sandbox environments like resistance 1, and definitely multiplayer of resistance 2! Can't believe they went from 64 players to 16..

forcefullpower4125d ago

Resistance 3 was awesome don't know why it got so much hate.

Highlife4125d ago

Resistance 1 best multiplayer, resistance 2 only liked co-op, resistance 3 loved single player.

Joda4125d ago

Resistance 3 was pretty good. Best controller layout hands down, grapics i think looked a little bland on the yellows and browns. Part one graphics were good. 2 was too glitchy and controller layout was annoying.

Imalwaysright4125d ago

If the online is like Fall of man then YES. If not I don't care.

Ickythump314125d ago

thank you! I feel it is very appropriate for this site.

BoNeSaW234125d ago

He won't be around long.

PoSTedUP4125d ago

indeed, but also this whole gen in general so far XD.

callahan094125d ago

Yes please. I love the franchise.

telekineticmantis4125d ago

Yes, just bring it to the "present" time or future. Continue to examine the "human"(sentinels) tranformations and their resistance to it, I loved that part of the story, and what you did with it.

P.S. if you haven't played R# make it your business to do so. Or atleast try to watch the cutscenes on YouTube ALL THE WAY TO THE END...

PoSTedUP4125d ago

i havent played #3. 1-2 were really good.

Show all comments (43)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
19d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted19d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8519d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele18d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk18d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay18d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
Athlon10119d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit18d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg18d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10118d ago (Edited 18d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14918d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
32d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_32d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle31d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit31d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog32d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog32d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad32d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_32d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage32d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda31d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

32d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong58d ago

looks god awful on the base systems