There aint much difference
But then again turn the RGB to full and you'll have better color on the PS3 for sure
But the gameplay the Xbox is miles behind
Blurry visuals
Not as fast paced
oh and no mods

someone forgot to turn on RGB to full...

there i said it

Here we go again...
Instead of wasting time watching these videos, we all should go and play the games we like.

Even though it isn't that great of a game, you can't beat PS3's user-created content.

ITT: People trying to spot difference that justifies buying a game for a console they don't own.

Got a PS3? Buy the PS3 version.
Got an XBox360? Buy the XBox360 version.
Only real question here is: Do you want mods or offline splitscreen?

My PC runs this game way more graphical and way higher resolution.

Same

Falling snow on the xbox 360's version, none on the ps3 version.
Massive ammounts of texture and bump mapping on the xbox 360's cut sceens, none on the ps3 version or very little.
Darker more alive on the xbox 360 version, washed out and bright on the ps3 version.

As usual the ps3 version lacks in every area. I guess it's just not as powerful as it was suppose to be. Kind of sad. Sony should be ashame dof themselves.

This is the wonderful similarity we see when the PS3 version is lead instead of just an afterthought port. Ugh, I wish more companies would take that approach...

nothing good lately here at n4g, off topic I injured my ribs in a football game(soccer for the US) so I have been unable to move around much, basicly just laying and resting as much as I can so I can get back in the gym. Really sucks, Im hoping to get better ASAP, for now I will try to enjoy just being lazy for a bit, watching marathon of Twilight ZOne, that show is good, the classic episodes. I should have a girl over but I might just make my injury worse LOL. On topic, not enough difference worth arguing about just the contrast which is adjustable on both consoles to match and be identical. Moving on...

every comparisons come with a conclusion, PS3 wins.

But necessary if you own both consoles. Otherwise, what is the big deal? Buy the game for your respective console. Lets be civil people. Bullying = fanboy tendencies. We can all get along...right?

Edit: I removed my original comment...it was a little inappropriate, even for the open zone

Exactly the same it would appear.

cant see any differences

Once again Unreal Tournament III looks leaps and bounds better on PLAYSTATION®3. Epic games have truly realized that the potential of this game is unrivaled on the PLAYSTATION®3 Home Computer Entertainment System.

It looks as if shortcuts and sacrifices needed to be made in order to get this game active on Xbox 360 as their hardware continues to struggle keeping pace with today's standards. Good thing Dark Sniper is playing b3yond because this game is a benchmark on what Xbox 360 is truly incapable of.

You cannot teach an old dog new tricks, Xbox 360 has made this painstakingly obvious.

$niper

think about how longer the 360 version has been in production

PS3 version needs to:

select Image > Adjustments > Selective Color > Blacks > Black: 30%

:)

Well X360 version looks a bit better, the funny thing is this video is recorded very badly cuz even the prerendered cutscenes are different how come? ha ha gametrailer sh!t no HDMI and stuff

360 had 6 months more in production and it looks like this? With no mod support??!? Thats rough...clearly if you want this game you should get it for the PS3.

Goulet

The difference is there:
- no keyboard / mouse support.
- no mod support.
- released 7 months after PS3 version.
Enough said.

Wow, which turd has more undigested corn nuggets and peanuts in it?

Really UT3 was a terrible game. Nothing new, not fun, and 16 player multi....that's okay, I'll go back to my 32-player Warhawk.

(Note I'm fully aware of MGS4 16-player, but it fits the situation and isn't very fast paced.)

Decent on PS3. Nothing more. I had a great time playing people in-person, instead of online. The problem, however, is that people get sick of the game quickly because it's all show and no substance. Like a young Kelly Bundy.

I remember when oblivion came out for the ps3. It had 3 times better graphics and loadtimes. You think the 360 could get better graphics with 7 months extra time! I guess not. Oh, well who would buy this flopper, no mods and no mouse and keyboard support make it doodie.

Ones darker then the other. No real difference other than that. So the only difference between the versions is ps3 has user created content. That's a shame too.

It's clear that the PLAYSTATION THREE version is light years ahead of its XBOX 360 competitors version. The conscientious that we here at news for gamers would even compare such things. The idea of this should be revoked and termenated of. With the ps3 versions better lighting, double AA and texture work, this should be deleted.
I call abuse and harrassment in defense of the 360 for such inconcievable torture that it has to bear.

--CASE CLOSED--

THEY ARE SO CLOSE TO BEING ALIKE, WHATS THE POINT OF THESE NOW DAYS? SHEESH...

BTW THE PS3 VERSION LOOKS BETTER! HE HE!

doesnt matter, im taking the game in for a trade, it was fun but got boring over time.

Is macroblocking on a bad feed...

360 looks so much more dynamic

yep ps3 version is better

Why? Because it's 360?

and its the PC.

The Xbox 360 version has better lightning effekts or the they forgot to put on Super white + full RGB colors on the PS3. I bet 20 bucks they forgot.

This is the only difference. You can easily see the lack of hardware support for HDR on the 360 by pausing the video. The parts that are black on the PS3 are black on the 360 but the parts that are grey and transitioning to black are often fully black on the 360. Because the 360 hardware does not support HDR it compensates by emphasizing the darker areas. As a result, the image tends to have a bit more "pop" but it's less technically correct. Since the Unreal Engine isnt really big on smooth transitions anyway it's not a huge loss. In games that have truly dynamic lighting and shadows, like MGS4 or Uncharted , such a drop in lighting quality (lack of HDR) would be very noticeable.

Between the two, any self-respecting shooter fan would get the PS3 version because of

1) keyboard and mouse support
2) user generated content (can turn it into Halo 3 but with better graphics!)
3) free online

Honestly I didn't see much of a difference except color palette on the ps3 version was lighter and darker shadowing on the 360.

I have both systems but I'm gonna stick with the ps3 version because of user generated content. You would have thought that Epic would have used all these extra months to really make the 360 version different besides the extra maps and stuff.

Oh well heres to Gears 2.....

I really enjoyed UR 3, the PS3 version's alot lighter which I like alot.

Ps3 is a tiny bit lighter in certain shots.

360 is a tiny bit darker in certain shots.

Exactly the same, is that so bad? That means the games are the same woooO!!!!!

The 360 Version plays with higher framerates...so does all other multi platform games.

Saying the 360 version is better is kinda like saying that farting blood isn't as bad as winning the lottery.

No User content = at least there won't be 50,000 master Queefs running around, oh wait, UT3 allowed Master Queef on PS3, granted nobody likes to use a shiny green tampon dispenser as a character.

When it comes to these comparisons people just see what they want to, the fact is only people with no lives will sit there for 3 hours analysing sh1t like this, to the naked eye they look the same and play the same. Fanboys need to sort their sheds out, the 360 and ps3 are more or less the same with only technical differences

The 360 is good for people who want to play by themselves or with a friend at their house because it has split-screen.

But it does not support user-generated content, keyboard and mouse support, plus you have to play extra to play online.

i never bought into this game but the ps3 version looks cleary better IMO. the 360 looks blurry and less detailed.

Really it looks nearly identical aside from the slight color difference which can be adjusted on your tv anyway. There are a few minor architectual differences.

1:30 - It appears as though the buildings are further away on the PS3. Also the pole seems to be away from the wall and the wall does look different as well. However this may just be the angle. The wall is clearly different though.

2:01 - This may be the color difference again, but at first I thought the 360 version actually had its water replaced with sand. lol Perhaps the lighting is supposed to be more 'dynamic' or something but it does look most noticeably different on the water.

And then the snow level at the end... can't really say one looks BETTER than the other but they are slightly different. It all really comes down to the color though. I can't detect any difference in textures. And really if you have to go through with a fine toothed comb to really notice anything then it's not gonna make ANY difference when you're playing.

I hate when people come in these topics and say one side clearly wins when they're nearly identical in every way!

It really comes down to which controller you prefer and whether or not you care about mod support.

Can't tell the diffrance

No point in doing stuff like this. No one cares what the comparisons are like except for dumb fanboys. Hell I dont even know why I am commenting on this. The only time it is appropriate to compare games is when there is a huge difference. I see nothing but one game being darker then the other and the odd lighting issues. For 7 extra months of development who cares.

Who, outside of fanboys, really cares?!?

as usual no differnce except lighting like every other comparison vid can we stop these now please? god damn fanboys

Fony PS3 got pawned again..all the video comparisions i seen up to date 360 mostly allways better.

Why?

It's that little 10mb ram module stuck on 360 gpu that makes all the difference. Whats it called again??

I give the game to the xbox 360 only for the controller, 360 controller was made for FPS. The game does suck on both systems, that why they said nobody was playing it on PS3....funny part is the Graphics are pretty much the same and xbox 360 is on a DVD not Blu-ray.. Devs are not using Blu-ray tech. very well yet.. and there's no Install on the xbox 360....

Ok...

I thought that Epic was going to re-make UT3 for XBOX 360 with improved graphics ?? What Ive seen so far is that nothing has been improved, in certain parts of the video the PS3 actually looks better..

Wtf is going on ?

If thats how they approach their games, then dont expect to see BIOSHOCK with better graphics on PS3.. when it comes out it might be worse or the same..

all i got to say iz ,QUIT LYING ...the 360 version looks better and eveyone knows it .all you sony nutthuggers are coming with they look the same ...THEY DO ,BUT the 360 version looks better just my opinion .......

look 99% identical 360 looks a tad more saturated like in all their games but in no way does 1 version look better.

Luckily I was only on it 3 min today. Anyone else whos been on the internet longer than 3 min on the 4th has no life. So LOL at everyone here! Unless your a Canadian or something. Canadians suck. Its just generic America :)

is negligible (graphically).

so i guess a person buying this would have to factor in achievement points, the controller, install time, etc....

if i gave a sh!t about this game, id probably get it on 360. my friend just sold his ps3 copy so he could get it on 360.

i guess when sony gets its act together on patch 2.4 and gets these trophies going, that decision might suddenly get a little bit harder.

IMO this game got old really fast

I love it when Droids are in denial, because they are there so much.

Multiplats lead on 360 = 360 better

Multiplats lead on ps3 = equal or 360 better

Is very disappointing for ps3 fans, i know....

Videogamer.com: "Hey, we need a bunch of page hits lets do a graphical comparison between a game on two different consoles just to stir up some controversy and get some page hits."

The game is stupid and i agree with Stryfeno1...besides the PS3 is better.

Earlier today I was reading an article on N4G that said this sight is overrun by 360 fanboys but as I read all the comments that say the PS3 looks better I see 2 to 3 times the agrees than disagrees and the ones that say the 360 looks better there are 2 to 3 times disagrees than agrees. So it is truly clear that this sight is overrun by SONY FANBOYS. If any of you have 20/20 vision you can see that the 360 version is sharper and has less blur than the PS3 and less screen tearing. THAT'S A FACT. Now lets see how many disagrees I get. You Sony Fanboys are like a plague. You keep spreading and spreading!!! Why don't yall go watch Movie Gear Solid 4.

Why does the 360 always seem to win these things? I could understand if it were a myth and not true, but it is true.

I think the 360 version has more contrast and just a little sharper image...but its real tough to notice.

If only comparing the 360 and ps3 Unreal was as easy as comparing the battlefield game between the 360 and ps3 (360 by a mile on that one)

boring game played it for 4 days stopped sold it

It looks to me like the 360 version is sharper, as is usual. Looks at the scenes where they're riding the skateboard-like things and the last scene in particular. If you look at the orb, you can really tell. Either way, both are very similar.

They look more or less identical to me, from the video at least.

These are the differences:

PS3:
- Keyboard / mouse support.
- Mod support.

X360:
- Splitscreen feature
- Exclusive maps. (that can probably be done with PS3s mod support.)

People are mislead to think that the PS3 version of UR3 was in development longer than the 360. Instead Gears of War was the first game to actually use COMPLETED Unreal 3 Engine code....

Unreal Tournment 3 development was only demo-ed on early PS3 dev kits that ran on two SLI 6800 cards. During that time none of the PS3's features were finalized or further development was done before the PC's version was complete.

In fact Epic used the Unreal 3 Engine on the 360 with Gears of War before they even reached pre-alpha with UR3. Gears of War was the actual spearhead of development for the Unreal 3 Engine, infact evidence can be found based on Silicon Knights lawsuit stating Epic handed out incomplete UR3 Engine code while they FINISHED the code in tandum with Gears of War development.

In short Epic used Gears of War to finalize development there for giving more dev time on the 360 than PS3.. now add the extra year of dev time for 360's UR3 and you have a version that is only the same as the PS3 if not only slightly better.

The 360 version looks slightly sharper to me, and slightly darker.

That's about it.

and this is based on UE3?, lol, seeing as the 360's best looking games run on that, 360 fans should be worried.

I think FULL RGB on the ps3 will get rid of the slight white haze effect. Definetly recommend it for great color. :D

Besides that, and the addition of fog in one scene for the 360 and snow. We are looking at the same damn game. Theres nothing to really say. SAME GAME!!@

ps3 version looks sharper and better, without doubt.

They look and run EXACTLY the same, with the only difference being that the 360 version is slightly darker. Why that is, I don't know, but if you take the fanboy blinders off you will see that's the only difference between the two. Seriously, this crap has got to stop.

If you want mods, get the PS3 or PC version
If you want splitscreen and LIVE integration, get the 360 version.

The framerates were exactly the same, and I even watched this comparison 5 times in a row, repeating multiple spots to try and see what you idiot fanboys are talking about. Alas, that was to no avail, as there really is no discerable difference. The 360 version even had the same amount of jagginess to it that the PS3 version does.

All this nitpicking, and you guys will probably forget about this game a month after it comes out.

God, u guys are gloating over lack of difference between 360 and ps3 versions but yet do not question sony's hype before/on/after launch of ps3 of it blowing 360 games out day one.

We can almost hear a sigh of relief from most of the comments above of ps3 owners expecting the usual of the game turning out better on 360.

are exactly the same now get over it you fanboy droids!

But I guess the thing that is enraging the xbots and making the sony fans happy is that despite the extra dev time the 360 version looks the same. so my conclusion is 360LOL!!!

oh and the PS3 has free online and mods so its the version to get.

/END OF THREAD AND DEBATE

PC kills both

360 pwns ps3 (again)

I got this game for £15 yesterday, its pretty good co-op :D but most droids wouldnt of had use for it since they have no irl friends :(

Atleast in my eyes..

Pc games look better because it cost twice as much as a console to do so ...duh. Dumb thing to say

Why don't any of you go outside, or get some friends? Or even, but not likely, get LAID!

Ps3 version suuuuuuuuucked.No multi player online from the same console not even a mulit player period for an unreal game is beyond my comprehension.You get this game for online.

Othervise it's the same!

A good solid online game for the 360, PS3 and PC. Who cares about the differences. Half the people that comment have no intention of buying it, pointless bickering. I'll pick this up on PC at a later date. Still playing Civ on 360 and MGS at a mates. More interested in Beijing 2008, more button bashing mayhem. Yey.

Got it on ps3 when it came out Loved it , Looks awesome fun to play quick pace feels exactly like the first and second unreal tournament.

But then i got a Brand new collector edition (the metal case) of UT III pc for 20$ at Ebgames, Since i installed it on my PC i haven't played it once on my ps3.

This is a game that was MEANT FOR PC, They did ok with the console version but if you have a good PC do yourself a favor and go pick up the PC version its awesome(to the max).

On the subject now. They both look the same.. It seem PS3 doesn't have Hdmi Full range yet again on this comparison. And still both version look the same. Who cares anyway go play instead.

Rock Band Fan?
Check out www.deathbyrhythm.com

clearly there are some visual differences...but honestly nothing so great it should make you get one over the other. Really they are basically the same game and so its going to come down to which console you prefer to game on....that it.

There is no magic bullet here. If you like the PS3 then get it for the PS3, if you like the 360 then you finally have it for your system.

The PS3 version has better visual effects (details blur and sharpen according to where you're standing) but other than that they look the same.

Does the 360 allow user mods or was that scrapped? I don't see why the 360 reviews should be just as good as the PS3 ones when the games is 8 months old and it doesn't support user mods. The graphics look a little more washed out on the PS3 ones in that comparison but it stops there. I own UT3 on PC and PS3 and have to say, there are better fps games out now.

as usual, 360 has higher contrast and looks better.

but who cares. UT's gameplay is so outdated and boring.

Bring on Gears 2.

I can care less if they run on 16 bit graphics. all i care about is they make new games.

I really don't see that much of a difference.
Graphics on the PS3 still look better though.
PS3 Version looks brighter and plays smoother in my opinion.
It still doesn't replace the fact that the game is still crap.
I owned the game so I would know.
On the back of the game it says there's a single player campaign yet it's just a training exercise to play online.
Your better off playing Warhawk than you are playing this game.
Hell to be honest I don't see that much difference between this game and Gears of War 2 from a graphics stand point.

They look the same to me. PS3 easily wins because it has M/K and mods support, altough split screen is a great addition...but mods take the cake.

If you honestly think that Xbox 360's version is better your lying to yourself. The PS3 is soo much cleaner.

the question is do u want mods or no mods i pick mods adds to the gameplay

I hate motion blur, whenever DF would say a version was better because of motion blur I always rolled my eyes because motion blur is not a defining element to me and I don’t feel like any game has emplemented it in a good way

I like it overall it helps convey speed better imo. But in multiplayer it can prevent you from seeing your enemy correctly.
However single player motion blur all the way

I don't like motion blur. It gets turned off when the option is available

The issue with motion blur is the implementation of the feature is based on a misperception of the human senses. We experience motion blur all the time in our everyday lives as we turn our head and look around. But the reality is we are unaware it is occurring. In games they have made the sensation overt and thus it is unrealistic. To many people it is annoying and for a few, sickening.

The same is partially true with headbob. In actuality, it occurs to varying degrees depending upon things as gait, skeletal structure, etc. But as we matured our brains rapidly developed compensation mechanisms such as your eye rotation almost imperceptibly up and down. They have made the sensation overt in many games and depending upon how it is instituted it can provide an unrealistic experience for the gamer.

It can be a good thing in 30 fps titles

Motion blur is annoying and interferes with my ability to play FPS. I expect to be able to see things as clearly as my eyes allow me to, so stop adding distortions to the game that interfere with my ability to aim.

Developers thinking that motion blur adds anything to the experience are 100% WRONG and should stop it.

I turn it off whenever possible, and normally DoF too (but that depends on the game and how well/badly it is implemented).

I always turn it down or off.

I always turn it off or set it to low if there is no off. My one major gripe about SoD2 is the motion blur and I really hope they patch in the option to turn it off.

I'm not a big fan of all those effects either if possible the first thing that is turned off is motion blur...

I also don't like lens glare especially in a game that is first person view..... for me it often breaks the immersion.....

why is there lens glare in a game world with no cameras? I wear glasses and lighting does not reflect that dramatic even if the excuse was a visor or glasses..........
In a game that could justify or make sense of lens glare, I still find that game developers have overly done/over intensified the lens glare/flare and it just becomes a distraction..........

Someone above mention depth of field.... Now that one if done correctly, I can handle but I still want the option to turn it off or adjust the intensity in game if the dev/pub over does it (and depth of field is often over done) for whatever game...........

Maybe devs just need to tone all effects back just a bit (probably worse now with HDR ha!) haven't updated my set still enjoying my Plasma TV I have had for a few years still got inky blacks/fantastic contrast and color :-)

I hate motion blur with a passion and I always turn it off.

Cant stand it one of the first setting's i mess with soon as a set up a new game.

Need to scale it back a bit also the bloom is getting too much in some games , never get sick of depth of field effect though .