All Channels
Popular
270°

Microsoft Working On "Exciting Devices" For Xbox One

Microsoft are working on some "exciting devices" for Xbox and are working closely with developers within and outside of Microsoft.

Read Full Story >>
thegamescabin.com
Double Toasted4195d ago

VR headset. I'd prefer Illumiroom myself though.

tlougotg4195d ago ShowReplies(1)
UnHoly_One4195d ago

I'm with you. I'd buy Illumiroom in a heartbeat.

Couldn't care less about wearing a VR headset.

nix4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

EDIT: ok i got it mixed with something else. taking my comment back.

NuggetsOfGod4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

I rather the headset. It puts u in the game world cheaper and without having to see an enemy destorted do to being projected on your dresser lol

Not so immersive when you can't clear the room of funiture.

That akward moment when you want to sit after an hour...

I hope MS does VR for xbox and brings it to windows to compete with Oculus.
Makes more sense business wise.

They said they want to show something cool for xbox and pc so there it is!

MS is loaded and is the perefect company for it! They could take a loss to move vr headsets.
Vr tools integrated into dx12 api would help.

UnHoly_One4195d ago

My whole problem with VR IS the headset.

It cuts you off from the outside world.

If somebody wants to talk to me while I'm playing now, they can. If they want to see what I'm doing, they can.

As soon as you put that headset on, you can't see or hear anyone else, they can't see or hear what you are doing, and can't talk to you.

It's a ridiculously anti-social experience, and maybe some people want that, but I don't. My girlfriend is usually in the room while I'm playing, and we have a blast laughing and joking about whatever stupid thing I'm doing in whatever game I'm playing, but all of that would be gone if I played with VR.

mcstorm4195d ago

@UnHoly_One I have been saying this about VR for a bit now.

It was also one of the reasons I said it would never be a massive take off like motion gaming was.

A lot of kids like to multi task now a days and having to take off the head set to rely to messages or changes songs ect will just not go down well with them.

The cost will also put a lot of people off too esp when you need 2 for MP.

For me something like Illumiroom is a better fit for me but for people who have bright rooms will have issues using this.

Ide like to see Microsoft do more with Kinect 2 if anything.

It is each to there own and I do think VR is a good product but I just don't see it taking off the way some people on this site think.

lemoncake4195d ago

I would love to have something like illumiroom, if they could make a device that did it at a reasonable cost I would be all over it. VR is great but would be nice to have some diversity between the machines and not just everyone jumping onto the same thing.

gangsta_red4195d ago

I have been saying that for a long time now too.

I don't like the fact that my whole perception is cut off. Especially with other people in my household.

And also the thought of a hunk of metal strapped around your face is just a little to dystopian for me.

I would be more interested in Illumiroom if it was reasonably priced and available.

beans4195d ago

I'm strictly Xbox and must say they can shove that illumniroom stuff. VR is the way to go And hopefully they dive in. Kinect plus VR will be a huge step in gaming. I remember when kinect was said to scan in items. Well with VR I see everything coming to light. True immersion

mark3214uk4195d ago

im not a fan of that illumniroom, it is like a feature wii u should have

having owed a oculus rift VR is the way forward

medman4194d ago (Edited 4194d ago )

@unholy_one
Uhhhhh....Microsoft already said illumiroom is a no-go because it would be too expensive (think a few thousand dollars) due to all the projectors it currently uses... http://www.theverge.com/201... This "room alive" tech is unfortunately probably a good decade away (at least) from coming down in price enough to be something that the average consumer could afford. Personally, I think I would prefer a vr visor, something that offers a greater level of immersion, but I think projecting images onto walls would definitely be something the majority of people could tolerate longer than a visor where the image is so close to their retinas.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4194d ago
Mega244195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

My guess would be a Kinect 3.0 with small projectors to create Illumiroom? Or maybe a something with VR, since sony has been in the same boat.

VegasDawg4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

Same here,I have really bad motion sickness don't know if I'll ever be able to wear the vr head set, best alternative seems to be the illumiroom.

Double Toasted4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

This 💩 all over VR in my humble opinion, lol.
http://mobile.extremetech.c...

Charybdis4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

Kernel device driver developer so maybe we can expect more 'xbox'apps/functionali ty on phones, tablets and other window (10) platforms working together with xbox1.

NeoGamer2324195d ago

VR is over-hyped.

I have Oculus Rift.

Used it for a few weeks and now it sits on my self of electronics I've bought because they were cool, but have no real practical long term use.

Personally, the things I want most are a portable X1 and some sort of compatibility hardware to play 360 games on X1.

Pogmathoin4195d ago

Yet if Sony do Illumiroom, he will adore it, cherish it, worship it....

yankolo4195d ago

Im with u sr give us illumiroom

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4194d ago
christocolus4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

Devices??? Seems there's more than just VR then and im sure kinect2 will be a major part of the puzzle. This must be what Phil hinted at when he talked about Kudo tsunoda returning to the limelight, working with external and internal devs should give some pretty cool results. MS recent announcment about forming a new studio focused on creating innovative kinect games sort of makes sense now. I guess we will see some big announcements at the windows event or maybe E3

The_Sage4195d ago

Yep... Because that's exactly what the xbox one needs. More pricey devices. Look how great the kinect has performed.

SteamPowered4195d ago

If Xbox can integrate kinect with VR it will silence the naysayers about kinect. Even bringing Cortana to the UI has turned heads.

The_Sage4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

Do you really think so?... I think project Morpheus is a colossal wast of money, and resources as well. The vast majority of people are not interested in buying this sort of tech. I think the Kinect should shed some light on this fact. Let's move away from gaming for a second and think about 3D. How many people do you know that bought a 3DTV (I only know one)? Of those people how many still wear the glasses to watch TV?...

Just like so many other things in the past, it's niche tech. This usually leads to very little return on investment, if not loss.

Jdoki4195d ago

I agree that Kinect 2 + VR is a killer feature, SteamPowered

The only problem I see is the cost. With MS creating a Kinect-less SKU it means anyone who bought that SKU is going to have pay significantly more for the full VR experience.

It could be argued that the type of people who buy an XB1 without Kinect are not the sort of people to buy VR - but that's not a certainty and it fragments the install base.

Also if their VR device works with and without Kinect - then we are in the same old situation where devs cannot guarantee that the customer has Kinect - so why bother developing for it.

MS made a huge mistake strategic mistake removing Kinect. They should have taken the hit, and lowered the cost but kept Kinect - it's not as if it would have hugely hurt them financially considering they splashed out over 2 billion on Mojang...

marlinfan104195d ago

@jdoki

Why would they lower the price and bundle the kinect? I think it's the opposite. If VR ever does take off the people without kinect will be snatching them up like crazy all while paying a premium price for it.

SteamPowered4195d ago

@The Sage
I am a firm believer in the power of VR. Not only in video gaming, but media in general. Imagine seeing a virtual concert, or virtual tour, possibly produced by Steven Speilburg (who has a serious boner for VR).
I also have a 3d tv and 3d projector, so I guess Im not afraid of new tech. But my friends are also very interested in VR pricing and peripherals, so it leads me to believe there is a potential market.

@Jdoki
It is a sticky situation for MS and the early adopters of Kinect. But it will also be sweet vindication for MS if VR does take off. Yeah it sucks that people will pay more for the kinect seperate from the console, but thats why it pays to be an early adopter sometimes. If MS can swing momentum back to the kinect, it will be a boon for them as the Kinect SKU will fly off of shelves as will the Pricey seperate Kinect.

Volkama4195d ago

Kinect 2 is unfortunately too slow for VR imo. You can feel the latency when you are moving a pointer around a screen, so it won't be good enough for VR.

Which is a shame, because it makes for an awesome concept.

Kingdomcome2474194d ago

@Volkama- You definitely make a valid point, but there was a demonstration video recently released showcasing new software for the Kinect which was rather impressive. Both it's detection speed, latency, and accuracy were shown to be greatly improved. I don't possess the knowledge to say what effect if any this would have on the system's allocated processing power, but I feel that there are a lot of things pointing towards some type of VR/AR experience being unveiled by Microsoft in the near future. If this does indeed come to pass, I'm sure that all the potential limitations that come with the territory are being fully explored. Hopefully we'll know something concrete in the near future. On another note, Project Morpheus seems to be relatively close to being consumer ready. Is their currently an official window for when it's set to hit the market that anyone knows of?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4194d ago
Death4195d ago

A VR headset is only one piece of the VR puzzle. Morpheus is using Move tech to enhance their VR which is very limited since it only tracks the lights on the helmet and the light on the controller. Skeletal mapping will benefit VR much more than a couple lights.

Kinect like Move is unused technology which is a shame. Resolution can only go so far and doesn't do much to create new experiences. In all honesty I've grown to appreciate Kinect even with it's limited use on the Xbox One. Having a second Kinectless Xbox One really shows how much more refined voice commands and facial recognition for auto sign in feels. If I can find a cheap Kinect I'll pick it up for the other Xbox One.

KiwiViper854194d ago

You can set the other Xbox to auto sign you in. If your the only one using it, that is.

4195d ago
WeAreLegion4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

And I'm excited to see what they come up with for VR. By this time next year, I could own Oculus, Morpheus, AND the Xbox One VR. I couldn't be more excited for this!

tekksin4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

wouldn't the first order of action be to actually make an exciting* console, first?

Double Toasted4195d ago

I can't think of a more exciting console than XB1 except the Wii U. All other options are vanilla...

Double Toasted4195d ago

I can't think of a more exciting console than XB1 except maybe the Wii U. All other options are vanilla...

marlinfan104195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

Lol the Xbox is the most exciting "next gen" console out there. While ps4 is more powerful, the ui feels basically like ps3. Xbox actually feels like a whole other generation console as it should compared to the 360

OrangePowerz4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

360 UI > X1 UI. Having to open apps to get to your friends list, achievements, settings and so is bad design. I take a simple and better to use UI any day over the abomination that Microsoft created with their Windows 8 design. That thing should have never gotten on anything else than touch devices such as tablets and smartphones.

marlinfan104195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

you honestly think any of those things you mentioned are hard to find? Friends list and achievements are 2 clicks of the home button away (in the snap menu) or you could pin them to your home and place it wherever you'd like. And settings are literally one click of the start button away lol. Do you own the console?

OrangePowerz4195d ago

I said it's a bad design that those things are apps and need to be opened instead of just normally integrated like on the 360.

4195d ago
Spotie4195d ago

And the UI is what makes a console exciting? Not the gaming features?

Are you serious?

OrangePowerz4194d ago

So far any changes they made to any of these apps had been delivered via their dashboard updates so it doesn't look like they plan on doing stealth updates to them.

Also what is the point of bringing the achievements app or friends app to any other platform? Windows LIVE is dead so the only reason you would use them on another platform is to see who is online or look at yiur achievements and tgere would be zero point in making them separate apps for other platforms. You would build it into one app. Little point in doing a separate achievements and friends app as example for Windows phones that require the user to change to different apps. Wouldn't you agree?

4194d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4194d ago
Show all comments (57)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio63d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing63d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9263d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit63d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing63d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9263d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay65d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn265d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn265d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown65d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay65d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay65d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac64d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger65d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300065d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde65d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde65d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7566d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_64d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.