360°

Is what Sony offering enough for the Hacker attacks?

Sony extending PlayStation Plus memberships by five days and offering a 10-percent PlayStation Store discount. But is it enough?

Read Full Story >>
thelaunchgate.com
Rimeskeem4032d ago

They arent even hacker attacks....... they didnt have to give anything away. Why do people have to question this stuff?

lodossrage4032d ago

Because their site(s) need hits

Gazondaily4031d ago

There's very little you can do against DDOS.

It's almost like demanding compensation for a flood that drowned your console. As far I'm aware, that kind of Force Majeure doesn't entitle you to compensation but then again, I wouldn't even remotely be surprised if people made such a demand these days.

If it was a hacking scandal I'd understand. This isn't the same thing that afflicted the PS3 all those years ago. That was downright unacceptable. This situation is completely understandable. If you're a rational human being that is.

Prime1574031d ago

5 days seems pathetic. Their site needs hits. The competition offered nothing.

People don't understand that lizard squad has been perfecting this ddos program: HELLO, they've been ddos-ing better and better and we've been making fun of them until now (and now they are selling it). It was a money ploy.

Hacker attacks... yes, but it's not a hack, and now it's available for any child with too much money.

NukaCola4031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

This is like saying if there are 500 people in front of you at Gamestop and non of them are purchasing a game, just wasting peoples' time...then the store is required to compensate you for time lost.

blockcoc4031d ago

@NukaCola You're not paying a subscription to be able to walk into gamestop though.

trenso14031d ago

Did microsoft even offer anything? Cause if they didn't then why is that sony is the only one under the microscope

freshslicepizza4031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

sony doesn't need to compensate their customers, instead they should be investing in a more secure and more efficiently run network. a network that doesn't bottleneck because there are spikes in users and one that isn't down for days because of ddos attacks. imagine if amazon couldn't fight back a dddos attack. the service should also not have to shut down even partially for routine maintenance either.

dcbronco4031d ago

Gamers that think they should be compensated for things beyond a companies control are brats that always feel entitled. Neither company owes anybody anything. Offering extra days was a nice gesture. What next, they have to compensate you if your home burns down?

SilentNegotiator4031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

I'm just reporting this article as fake. Any site that spreads misinformation by calling/implying that a DDoS attack has anything to do with hacking should simply not be allowed to post said article here.

Furthermore, this "is Sony compensating enough?" article trend is a complete joke. PSN and XBL both had issues for a couple days, Sony offers compensation, MS offers none...and we get articles asking why SONY isn't compensating more? Where's the "Should MS give compensation?" articles?!

nveenio4031d ago

@moldybread, Amazon can be victim of the exact same attack. They aren't immune. They just aren't a fun target. People target Sony because it's easier (there is less redundancy), and they think they can get away with it. But I think the only reason Sony gave compensation is because they think they might have a handle on cracking down on attackers. And by giving compensation, they can say, "These attacks cost us exactly $X in damages." Which is way better than just asking the courts to come up with a number. This will make the penalties super sick, and will discourage the hobbyist from taking part. Sure, it won't stop attacks, but that's not the point. The point is to make the ones you catch hurt, while also saving face with consumers.

Kayant4031d ago

"Because their site(s) need hits" -Basically. Service was patchy/down for 4-5 days company gives you back said days and added bonus of a discount. There is no ready to complain or question "if it's enough" because you got back your lost service time and more.

Dee_914031d ago

I just spilled my beer
Sony owes me a new tv

N4Flamers4031d ago

Most of you posters suffer from low self esteem. Ps plus is a service you pay for. If that service is unavailable for whatever reason that is not on the user end then you deserve to be compensated. When a tree falls on a power line and shuts down your power you do not continue to pay for power and say well that was out of the power companies control.

I think sony has adequately compensated consumers for time lost. Im glad they did that, it saves face.

nveenio4030d ago

@N4Flamers, I get what you're saying, but that's a poor analogy. With power, you pay for consumption above a minimum threshold. That's different than paying for access to something.

A better analogy might be gym membership. You spend $x to access a gym for a month, but there is a major ice storm that month and you can't get to the gym. Does the gym have to reimburse you? No. They'd only have to reimburse you if they closed their doors during that time.

Sony didn't close their doors. Some idiot just parked in the entrance to the parking lot, and it made it difficult for people to get in.

But it really doesn't matter, because Sony did consumers a solid (whether they were obligated to or not), and no one loses anything.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4030d ago
Snookies124032d ago

Exactly, if it was their security being breached and hacked, then they would have to compensate. This was a simple group of people who were basically trolls screwing with gamers. There was nothing Sony or Microsoft could do to prevent it.

I'm grateful for what they're giving, because they honestly didn't have to do a thing.

thereapersson4032d ago

Because most people have no idea what hacking is, and anything that causes an e-nconvenience is considered a "hack"

Clown_Syndr0me4031d ago

Of course they did.
Have you ever been in a Cinema during a power cut? It isn't their fault but they give you a refund.

Smoey4031d ago

A DDoS is not a HACK it's an ATTACK.

People need to learn the difference before spouting out shit.

BG115794031d ago

Technically the DDOS is a tool used for hacking. It helps to figure out the weakness of the servers and to cause errors that may enable illicit access to a server.
The fact that although the connections were troubled, no information got out.This is actually a good sign that the info in the servers are quite safe.

pompous4031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

Exactly. But why are there "is Sony compensating enough?" articles so often.. Do these authors know it was a dual attack and currently the other network isn't offering anything. So why are there missing articles about "is MS doing anything to make right for customers?". NEWS FLASH XBOX ISN'T GIVING OUT SHIT CURRENTLY.. That's more of an article piece than one about Sony who is the only one trying to make up for it.. I love how MS can do no wrong to the media or the industry as a whole despite them being/doing lots wrong, but never pointed out or held under the same scrutiny as they do Sony. Maybe it's because Sony is more important to the industry than MS..

NegativeCreep4274031d ago (Edited 4031d ago )

All my feelings exactly! As of yet, I haven't heard any news about Microsoft making any kind of gesture of goodwill towards the people that were affected by Xbox Live being downed because of this DDoS attack, so why is Sony exclusively being scrutinized so much despite the fact that they have already made a gesture of goodwill?

This "article" is nothing but a fanboy piece.

FanboyKilla4031d ago

Lol at the dc, but honestly they dont have to give anything, and thats exactly what they are doing.

Saijahn4031d ago

They are hacker attacks, not an actual hack like last years data breach on PSN, but it's still a security issue.

And yes Sony didn't have to give away anything, but what they did give away was chump change when they've had issues time after time on their network. And I fully expect this type of attack to happen again.

We need to be honest here and hold Sony accountable for their lack of precautionary measures. Why are they the one network between all 3 consoles that consistently have this problem? You think it's a coincidence?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4030d ago
Majin-vegeta4032d ago

First off OP learn the difference between the term "hacker and script kiddie.

Second yes it;s more than enough.

Tell me do you ask for compensation for the following things when they go bust

Electricity
Satellite/cable
Gas for car(When still giving payments on it)
Internet...etc etc....

I swear ever since Sony gave the 2011 games away people now expect compensation everytime soomething like this happens.Bunch of overself entitled brats is what many have become this gen.

Also before someone gives me that damn "Well you can't compare them bla bla bla bla Speech ask yourslef this.

"What do all these things have in common??That's right they're being paid for. I rest my case.

rajman4032d ago

actually when my Internet went down for about 3 days last year, I was refunded the amount it would have cost for 3 days lol

tiffac0084032d ago

What was the cause of the outage? Usually internet providers refund you if the issue was on their end.

thereapersson4032d ago (Edited 4032d ago )

Someone once put it best: do you call up the lock manufacturer of the locks on your door when a robber busts your door in because the lock didn't withstand brute force, asking them to replace your TV the robber stole?

Majin-Vegeta, the sad part is, someone disagreed with you first.

rainslacker4032d ago

Wish Time Warner would have done that for me before I dropped them. Couldn't go a day without the internet dropping out for 10+ minutes, or a week without it being down most of the day. Had it go down for 4 days once, and they said it wasn't their fault. Over the course of 6 months, I probably couldn't log on for at least 2 weeks worth of time.

Anyhow, it's not common for companies to compensate for down time, but I suppose it's possible if you complain to the right people.

in this case though, seems that no matter what Sony does, it probably wouldn't matter to some people.

sjaakiejj4032d ago

Isn't that the same as Sony did here? I'm a bit confused by the whole ordeal.. Most companies don't even give you compensation for downtime unless the law mandates it, so why is anyone expecting Sony to compensate them for PSN being down a few days?

thereapersson4032d ago

sjaakiejj, It's called the entitlement mentality, and it runs rampant across society nowadays.

JoeReno4031d ago

the break down of a refund for your PS+ subscription would be for 5 days (being generous) is 70 cents. so 10% off and 5 added days to a PS+ subscription is plenty in my opinion.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4031d ago
SINISTERGENESIS4031d ago ShowReplies(2)
EcoSos34032d ago

Yes they are already giving you back the days you lost back and 10% of on any purchase in the store. I may not like Sony as much as I did but you dont see me demanding for more so just be happy with what they are giving you.

rainslacker4032d ago

It's enough for me, because honestly, I never expected them to do anything given that it was only down for 2 days for most people, with some intermittent problems afterwards.

Outside of the 2011 PSN hack, I've never once been compensated by any company for down time on their networks.

If they make it a standard policy to make up down time, then I think it could set a good trend for companies to try a bit harder to keep their services up and running, although I do understand that it wasn't completely on them this time.

Show all comments (119)
20°

Best Adventure Game of 2025

VGChartz's Lee Mehr: "While not carrying the same heft it enjoyed long ago, last year was one of the adventure genre's most commercially-successful years in this century. A Telltale-esque adventure eclipsing 3 million sales in three months would be the talk of the town were it not for another adventure game hurdling over 10 million sales in two. Though not all finalists reached those heights, each did share a greater amount of spotlight compared to similar titles within their respective sub-genres.

Past any sales thresholds and popularity contests, 2025 also deserves credit for its creativity; the last time our entire shortlist consisted exclusively of new IPs was for Best Adventure Game of 2020. An impressive year for the genre, with even greater potential ahead."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
20°

Ace Combat 7: Skies Unknown Has Sold 7 Million Units

Bandai Namco announced today that its popular flight simulator-lite Ace Combat 7: Skies Unknown has passed another sales milestone.

80°

Sony Remade Demon’s Souls, So Why Won’t It Touch Bloodborne?

The Outerhaven writes: Bloodborne is still one of PlayStation’s most beloved exclusives, but it remains trapped on PS4. Meanwhile Demon’s Souls got a full PS5 remake. But why?

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein16h ago

Demon's Souls was a PS3 game.

Bloodborne is PS4 and can be played on a PS5.

There's no need for a remaster.

Relientk7713h ago

I completely agree with you on this. If you want remasters or remakes give us games from the PS1 or PS2 era like Legend of Dragoon.

Eonjay8h ago

I would say thats a personal oponion trying to be passed off as a law. Truth is thre are many people who would love a remaster.upgrade so they can play Bloodborne at 60 FPS. People would literally love that.

shadowhaxor10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

I mentioned that in my article, did you read it? I literally pointed out this is exactly why the game is still doing well, and why Sony has zero reason to remake/remaster it.

And there are plenty of PS4 to PS5 remaster/remakes, to counterpoint that.

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
GTA V Expanded & Enhanced
Ghost of Tsushima Director’s Cut
Control: Ultimate Edition
Death Stranding Director’s Cut
Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves Collection
The Last of Us Part II Remastered

Eonjay7h ago

Either because they technically can't because From Soft wont allow them too, or because From Soft is sorking on the sequal, remaster themselves. Therre is a third option of course and that would be that they are working on it

MinnesotaFatts5h ago

Some part of me wonders if there's some sort of corporate war going on at Sony.

Daver8h ago

I want a new one not a remaster

victorMaje7h ago

TLoU got the remaster & then the remake treatment.
Where is the next bloodborne, or remaster, or remake?

Goodguy016h ago

What it needs is a ps5+pc release. The game absolutely needs a 4k60 update. Lots of money sony is sleeping on while the souls genre is still hot.

MinnesotaFatts5h ago

Tell me you don't know what a remaster is without telling me.

Bloodborne is infamously capped at 30fps on either system--a bizarre design choice given that speed and reaction time is central to the gameplay systems. This capped performance was never patched out officially, unless you jailbreak and mod your console. A remaster for modern hardware, not the infamously finicky PS4 devkits, would be a great way to both hyper-optimize the game *and* drive sales for the PS5, which still doesn't have a system seller title.

spoonard49m ago

I don't want a remaster, I want a ground-up remake, like Demon's Souls. 60+FPS, higher res textures, and higher poly models. Why wouldn't anyone want those things for Bloodborne???

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 49m ago
RaiderNation10h ago

There might be some licensing red tape they cant get around?

shadowhaxor10h ago

That'd be interesting, but Sony owns the IP 100%. So, I can't see how that is part of the issue, if there is even one.

RaiderNation6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Maybe Sony isnt interested in doing it without the assistance of Miyazaki and he's not interested? (Just spit-balling).

BeHunted48m ago

Sony doesn't own the studio that created the game

MinnesotaFatts5h ago

That's the issue according to FROMSOFT. They'd *love* to do a remaster, but Sony won't even return their calls.

Inverno10h ago

Because they're saving that for the PS6 to lure in all the suckers that will think they're making a sequel, but the whole gen will pass by and From won't ever touch it because Song doesn't care for either Demon or Blood outside of remakes.

Furesis7h ago

Because they made them do something else, then they canceled it and who knows what they are doing these days. They dont understand what they have and honestly i dont think they know what they are doing either.

blacktiger6h ago

How bout forget remade and start making new game pls?

Show all comments (28)