CraveOnline: "Back in October I wrote about a trailer that had debuted for an upcoming indie game called Hatred. I branded it “the most offensive video game trailer ever,” and that opinion wasn’t borne out of a desire to unleash yet more clickbait onto the World Wide Web, but because it was legitimately the most offensive game trailer I had yet seen."
A game about killing people.
This game was just gratuitous violence. I don't know why it was rated AO. It's no worse than a GTA killing spree, Hotline Miami, or even the 'No Russian' COD mission. Reminded my of a weaker Dead Nation except no zombies.
And we have highly sexualised Japanese games like Senran Kagura which are often either borderline, or practically straight up soft core.. and not even rated AO, some even rated lower age than GTA!
Makes you wonder what's wrong with the ratings systems overall tbh, potentially exposing kids to all kinds of nasty stuff.. but then that's more the parents fault anyways, and the upper age ratings are definitely nowhere near kid friendly, yet you still get little kids playing certain things they shouldn't be.
Sex should not even be an issue. Violence, on the other hand, should have restricted access. I don’t know anything about this particular game, but sounds like the difference between this and GTA is that GTA is a game about mafia, so violence itself isn’t the lure of the game. It’s telling a story. But a game about murder, is a game centered on murder as the selling point. I Don’t know, I see a difference here.
@genericgamer01
We are confusing a number of issues here:
1) I think we all agree that any outright censorship is bad.
2) violence does in fact have negative impact on young kids.
3) as a matter of public welfare, some things are not better left to the unchecked discretion of people, in this case parents. This is why we all obey traffic laws.
4) while the right to raise your children how you see fit is a fundamental right, not all parents know how/are able to raise their children in a proper way, and the rights of the child and society should also be considered. Unfortunately, while we get a manual with everything, and attend classes for things like driving, a child does not come with a manual and no classes are offered to parents about how to raise a child.
5) there is a strong interest in protecting those in our society who do not have a means of protecting themselves. This includes children who cannot protect themselves from bad parenting.
6) we do in fact have experts in every field, both inside and outside government, who have dedicated their lives to specific fields, and DO know more in that subject than the general public. (To argue otherwise is called anti-intellectualism, which is a major problem in our society today, i.e. flat earthers)
Therefore, we should have regulations that guide parents, and also prohibit them from allowing their young to engage in activities that are either damaging, or have the propensity to derail their development into functioning positive members of society.
Lastly, the issue of politicians using video games as a means to seem tough, is an altogether separate problem as these individuals should not be allowed to take the reigns from experts on matters of public policy without scientific support.
I guess the biggest difference here is the goal of Hatred is to murder where as GTA isn't all about killing sprees, Hotline Miami is too cute to be taken seriously, and COD isn't all about wiping out Russians. Best comparison is probably Dead by Daylight where 50% of the game is being a serial killer trying to kill survivors in gruesome ways and it is only rated M.
I'm surprised Switch is getting this and PlayStation/Xbox isn't. The game was basically Postal with better graphics and more realism.
I'm not. Sonys the one that's been caught censoring anime bikini girls. Nintendo has been vocal about being against censorship.
https://www.google.com/amp/...
https://www.exclusivelygame...
Haha. Only with the switch, because money. Nintendo has censored more games than anyone.
Nintendo will censor their games but not 3rd parties. That's what tey said since few will click any links.
@reals
So only with either company's most recent consoles? The ones most relevant here in 2020?
@ Ted
I just find it funny that people make it seem like Nintendo has always championed non censorship. They have only relaxed their stance to deliver to their shareholders. Good for them, I guess.
@reals
What I think you're noticing is people going at Sony, because they have been the censorship kings of this generation.
I've never seen people voicing Nintendo's anti-censorship stance, because they've obviously been bad with that in the past. But we're talking about now, and Sony is the one always seen censoring content nowadays.
Destructive Creations has today released its popular PC real-time strategy game, Ancestors Legacy to PS4 and Xbox One.
anyone played this? any good? been wanting a RTS on PS4 so might pick this up if its any good
I've played it on PC, it's pretty good. Not sure how well it will play on consoles, the control scheme will make or break it.
I can talk about it now :) - My review is on the site but the short of it is, it's a great game - very long with eight campaigns spanning four civilisations and time periods. Controls take a while to get used to, as there's no mouse and keyboard support and there's a lot of shortcut combinations, but once you've mastered it, it's really good.
Really? Should be. It's the date I was given, as our reviews were embargoed until midnight this morning. Maybe EU is Thursday and it's America today (which would usually be in about three more hours or so)?
GameRVW met with the Destructive Creations team at Gamescom to discuss Ancestors Legacy and play the soon to be released console version.
Guess what all these video games are in some form or another? How many seconds and minutes do you have to kill before you're a mass-murderer of everyone's time?
I know people want to be able to enjoy whatever they want, but this game has no merit.
Meh, I have no interest in it but it seems silly to start censoring violence. Where do we draw the line?
I say let freedom ring. Censorship is for the Mothers Groups and others with too much time on their hands.
Not choosing to sell a game is not censorship.
There are other marketplaces. Try GOG. See if they reject it too. This is what happens when you push the decency envelope and act like things are open platforms when they aren't at all. Valve's shop, valve's rules.
With some sort of story or social commentary or anything people would be defending the game, the devs fish for controversy at the expense of everything else and it backfired comically.
This is hardly Apple-level gatekeeping. "Let's not accept this game that's tailor made to court controversy and risks blowing up on anyone associated with it. Which probably won't even be legal in multiple countries anyway and is likely to cause us all sorts of legal headache down the road." Yeah. Sensible.