All Channels
Popular
190°

Destiny DLC Restricts Non-Upgraded Users

Tickles writes -"This is our chance as gamers and as a community to stop this trend before it can go any further. Show your outrage! Contact Bungie and Activision, tell them we are not going to take the rampant money grab and (for lack of a better word) “bullying” that they have shown today. If we don’t put a stop to this kind of behaviour now, how long will it be before game developers provide the first three missions of a game and require additional payment for subsequent levels, if you want to level up your character, you need to buy an upgrade pack, if you want to finish on the climactic end level it will cost you an extra £20/$20 and if you want the multiplayer content you need to buy the multiplayer pass. This won’t happen tomorrow or even next year but unless we talk with our wallets, it will happen. BungieVision have started that ball rolling with taking away what gamers had after buying the game, and if such “esteemed” companies can do it….. everyone will."

Read Full Story >>
mousenjoypad.com
NerdStar74182d ago (Edited 4182d ago )

"BungieVision" LOL.

JWiLL5524182d ago

Fairly certain he was laughing at the terminology, not curious about how it was formed :)

LordMaim4182d ago

And article number 6 on this topic.

metalmatters4182d ago

So people that dont want to buy the DLC want to play the dlc? I like that logic

xHeavYx4182d ago

Like you were explained before "People who don't want to buy the DLC want to have access to missions that they previously had access to"

metalmatters4182d ago

I do understand that, but its not like its permanent, its just this week and 6 weeks from there again, its not permanent Heavy

4182d ago
pelida4182d ago (Edited 4182d ago )

I hope they bring a 7th article on this subject; cause is Bullshit and people need to hear about it.

And stupid moronic fanboys are defending this crap!

I like the game but come on people

What's wrong with you Bungie? You used to be like the best studio ever.

OUROSMAG4182d ago

So do you get this mad when you're playing CoD or BF4 and the map rotation is something you don't have? Cause that's all it is. The weekly strike and heroic are both from the DLC.

You can't play something you weren't willing to buy, quit your crying and move on. Base game content will return next week.

CorndogBurglar4182d ago

I'll try to give a good argument without acting like a child.

What you say is true, in CoD or BF, you can't play when a DLC map comes up in the rotation if you don't have the DLC.

However, the big difference is that in those games, you can still quit that match, and rejoin another match that isn't running the DLC map. In fact, BF4 had a choice to include DLC content in the rotation, or not.

Destiny isn't allowing the people to do this. If a DLC weekly or Nightfall falls into the rotation, the non-DLC players cannot just join a new game. They are out of luck until next week, when, hopefully, non-DLC strikes will be chosen. They are basically disabling two of the remaining 4 things left to do in Destiny once you've reached the endgame.

I can understand the frustration. I have the DLC, but I would be pretty upset if I didn't.

kneon4182d ago

it's not like that at all, in COD or BF4 one map is the same as any other. In the case of Destiny they have locked players out from two of the events that yield some of the best awards.

4182d ago Replies(1)
martinezjesus19934182d ago (Edited 4182d ago )

So you want to play a strike you didn't buy??

Edit. I just saw your reply to psin4mant, wow, you dare call someone else a moron??

kneon4182d ago

I don't think anyone was expecting to play content that they didn't pay for. The issue is that this week, and presumably on random weeks in the future, players that didn't buy the DLC don't have a chance to play the weekly events and thus will not be able to collect the full amount of goodies that should have been available to them that week. In effect punishing those that don't buy the DLC.

Bungie could have easily avoided this by substituting in one of the old missions for those without the DLC, but I guess they never bothered to build in such flexibility.

sp0tlessmind4182d ago (Edited 4182d ago )

@ Pelida

Apparently Pelida as well many other people seem to forget that Destiny is a 10 year plan. That will carry your characters over to other games. Hence "become Legend"

How is it BS when this content was known for over a year?

If you wanted to play Destiny, then you should of known all this already?

I mean it can't be that hard to cough up $20? Or maybe you are 15 years old and Mommy said you can't have anything until Christmas. LOL

4182d ago
CorndogBurglar4182d ago

Really? He just gave you a perfect comparison to what is going on, and all you can say is, Bla bla bla?

You can say what you want, but people like you give the people that are trying to point out the flaws in this situation a bad name.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4182d ago
Show all comments (31)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans479d ago (Edited 479d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr478d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast627d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

627d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris627d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

627d ago
anast627d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole627d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast627d ago (Edited 627d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

627d ago
anast627d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 627d ago
Profchaos627d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_627d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981627d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140627d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85627d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj627d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman627d ago (Edited 627d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake627d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn627d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg627d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07627d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

626d ago
Knightofelemia626d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 626d ago
Chevalier626d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom627d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac627d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake627d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark627d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde627d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125627d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)