I'm holding out for a wii-u version. If ubi is making watchdogs for wii-u and they made black flag for wii-u then i'm really hoping they make unity for wii-u as well.

Or maybe they can make a zombie-u 2.

pretty much what yarbie said, Assasins games have always been very CPU heavy(for some reason), which is why PC ports are particularly bad.

Hopefully they will patch some of the performance woes, but overall, as long as its the same foundation on the anvil engine being so CPU intensive, we might see more of these issues in the future

CPU.

For all the people that are saying it because of the cpu the xb1 is performing better .....There's also GPGPU.

And @yarbie1000

"Ubisoft said this and that"

Lol man.... you actually believe what ubi says ?
They've been feeding us lies since this gen started.

@MPOG

"Just got into it with *Lukas_Japonicus* in the "Assassin's Creed Unity PS4 vs Xbox One Video Comparison: Xbox One Has Sharper Image Qualitity" article when he was damage controlling the article over the same topic. "

First of all, it's nice to know I'm on your mind. Secondly, we sure did get into it in that article....and I seem to recall you saying this:

http://n4g.com/news/1619439...

"Lets see how fast Eurogamer comes to the PS4's rescue with lies or more PS4 favorable spin."

Yet this article does the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you said it would and shows the X1 as the best performing version when there are tons of NPCs around. Completely shattering your long-running BS conspiracy theory that DF are pro-Sony and have some sort of agenda against the X1.

You kinda shot yourself in the foot calling me out just now, didn't you? Silly goose. Don't you ever get bored of being proven wrong so much? You must be a sado-masochist.

"The XB1 version Performs better because put simply, XB1 does some things better."

Yep, just like the PS4 version performs better at other parts of the video because, put simply, PS4 does some things better. Cherry-picking praise is fun!

"Can't wait to see remote CPU processing with Azure built into DX12 SDK in 2015, so much of the One's hardware is used elsewhere. "

Lmfao. Do you even know what any of that will actually do for the X1 outside of what what you've been told in tech demos and slideshows from MisterX? Or are they just words that sound nice together in a sentence to you? Here are two words that I think sound nice together: Self-reassurance.

"Watched HAlo 5 gameplay last night and my mouth was wide open and stayed that way against my will(The detail and lighting was CGI like in beta)"

Then you must be easily impressed, because all I saw was 720p, low-res shadows, plain textures, and placeholder Spartan suits. My mouth was firmly shut the entire time.

Many previous reports were indicating that the PS4 CPU, depending on the task, was at least equal to (or better) than the XB1 CPU.
The PS4 CPU clock was never officially revealed either.

At most, in the "worst" case scenario, the clock difference is 10% which would never translate in a pure 10% difference in a real world scenario (aka outside of a benchmark).

How do you then explain up to a 25% difference in framerate (20 vs 25)?

At best for Ubi, it looks like sheer technical incompetence & that they would have spent less time to optimize the PS4 version. At worst, it's possible downright sabotaging of the PS4 version which will then be "magically" corrected in a patch that will show up "gasp" after the tech analysis is published and most medias report on "PS4 has the worst version!" (hint: it was also the case for both COD and AC4 last year).
Looks to me like, if it's option 2, their "shackle" on the PS4 worked a little too well (was probably meant to obtain either complete parity or slightly better on XB1 by 1 or 2 fps to be explained away by "CPU offset").

/teamtinfoihat

Disgusting.

@Green

Dude... being a massive fanboy is one thing but also a total liar? ONE site made a false claim that the X1 version is sharper. Not site(s).

The X1 does things better? Like running into the single digits in the same game?

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

And I'm sure Halo 5 impressed you greatly...despite it running at 720p... but you are used to that arent ya? ;)

@donthate why would u say ps4 gamers have no games to play , how would u like if someone says u only have halo ce to play until halo5 comes out because as far as its known there are no exclusive games coming ti x1 till fall 2015 ps4 has lbp then we have bloodbourne ,the order 1886 , planetside 2 , tomorrow's children, in the next couple months

You should see this on PC, it's buggy to hell too.

Because you know nothing about how these things work. PS4 has a bottleneck. It's not all about GPU power. Just bought a Titan GPU (A DAMN TITAN!!!)recently for my wife so she can play ESO and Itotally forgot she's still on intel i3 CPU. Since almost all MMOs are CPU bound she was getting 30 FPS at best. Upgraded CPU to i7 and BAM! Over 100 FPS and higher graphic settings possible. You guys just get fooled to easily by PR talk. You'll see article about GDDR5 ps4 RAM and everyone here will chant about how RAM is most important. Then GPU article pops up and every armchair dev is preaching how GDDr5 and GPU is all you need. Every little component counts and needs to be extremely well ballanced.

This game is a mess. Why the hell wouldn't they reduce the npc count to make it playable if they can't optimize it enough to make it run at a locked 30fps on consoles is beyond me.

Is it really more important to have hundreds of npcs than a playable framerate Ubisoft? Are you kidding me?

I'll wait for some PC benchmarks before finally deciding wether 'll buy this game or not but from what I've read the PC version suffers from the same issues as the consoles counterparts.

did you play gta v on ps3

@bleedsoe9mm

....Yes? I'm sorry, how is that relevant?

Are you trying to say that the framerate of AC:U, a current-gen game, is acceptable, because a game made for 8-year-old hardware also dipped frames?

Because if you are, that would be some pretty far-fetched logic.