All Channels
Popular
90°

AMD Catalyst 14.11.1 Beta Released, Brings Performance Optimizations In COD: AW & AC: U

DSOGaming writes: "Earlier today, we shared a new driver for NVIDIA’s graphics cards. Well, AMD has not forgotten its users and has also released a new beta driver that brings performance optimizations in both Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare and Assassin’s Creed: Unity."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
FromTheAshes4246d ago

:( No support for the mid-low end AMD? My 260X can use some love too!

VJGenova4246d ago

AMD has been really diaappointing me with their drivers lately. 14.9 rendered my quad firing 6990s useless. I can only use one of them and 14.9.1 which was supposed to correct the issue wouldn't install correctly. I either could revert to 13.12 or 14.9. I chose 14.9 for now, but I'm just glad my new rig will be ready soon.

kinda wishing I didn't let my friend convince me to get a r9 295x2 instead of a gtx980. Very frustrating indeed.

FromTheAshes4246d ago (Edited 4246d ago )

That sucks. I am thinking of making the switch to Nvidia as well. Nvidia is winning on the performance, efficiency, and driver update front at the moment. AMD needs to be more aggressive.

karlowma4246d ago

I was benching a GTX 970 vs a Radeon HD 290X today. Guess who won?

Team Green is looking good these days.

Twignberries4246d ago

Are you serious?? R9 295x2 rapes a single gtx980!

VJGenova4245d ago

@Twignberries

On paper it looks amazing. However, every game that's come out in the past 2 months, at least that I care about, is optimized for Nvidia drivers or has some special features only for Nvidia. Also the R9 295x2 is twice as expensive as a GTX 980. I hope it's worth my money ... the 2 6990s I bought 3 years ago, sadly, were not.

Twignberries4245d ago (Edited 4245d ago )

@Genova84
Well to be more specific, it really depends what res you are gaming at. I've got 2x r9 295x2 for 4k and can tell you first hand they are currently the best cards on the market for driving 4k hands down.. Especially after the latest driver. The main problem isn't with amd or nvidia (which btw I'm not a fanboy, I love both) it's the software developers more often than not.

Side note though, all this nvidia exclusive stuff is getting me a little salty, especially after I invested so much in AMD this time around.

VJGenova4245d ago

@Twignberries

I'm currently only gaming at 1080p. I play from my recliner in my living room and until the price of 65" 4k tvs that actually run at 60hz comes down, I will continue to do so. So many of them claim 120 hz but it's really 24 frames flashed 5 times which is totally unacceptable for gaming.

My original plan was to get a strix 970 to tied me over until the next big thing came. Now that the 980 ti is delayed to 2016 though, I think I will be ok with my choice.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4245d ago
Deividas4246d ago

Woot Woot. AMD getting it together and releasing the Optimization before the release. Nice one indeed

karlowma4246d ago

Nice to see some updates, but still no crossfire fix for Shadow of Mordor, a GotY contender.

50°

Assassin's Creed Unity's 4K 60fps Patch Isn't 4K - But The Upgrade Is Still Worth It

The best way to experience a unique chapter in AC franchise history.

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
andy8584d ago

Give me a proper PS5 port with trophy list, Syndicate too and I'd happily buy them both again

40°

Assassin's Creed Unity: Play in 60FPS on PS5 & Xbox Series X

The French Revolution waits for no one.
But now it runs at 60 FPS on PlayStation and Xbox Series X.
Rediscover Assassin’s Creed Unity in breathtaking clarity.

60°

Next-Gen Xbox on Track for 2027 Release According to AMD

AMD has mentioned that the next-gen Xbox is on track for release in 2027, which means we might be in the final year of the Series X|S.

142d ago
KicksnSnares142d ago

Xbox is dead. How are they making another console? Fake news lol

fr0sty142d ago (Edited 142d ago )

They might think taking a crack at the PC/console hybrid approach might work out for them... but with PS6 delayed until 2029 at least, there went the power advantage that paying all that extra money was supposed to afford them once PS6 does launch. Also, releasing a console right now is stupid with RAM prices as high as they are. Either we're gonna be forking out $1200-1500 for this thing, or it's going to get downgraded. It costs over $700 to put 64GB of RAM into a PC right now because all the AI datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM.

Maybe a select few gamers will be willing to fork out that much $ for a system that is more powerful than PS5 Pro, but most gamers are only just now feeling like PS5 is hitting its stride and still has a few years of life left in it before we need to move on to a new generation. Plus, by the time PS6 does launch, RAM prices will be stablizing, so PS6 will be able to put much more of its overall budget towards a more powerful GPU and CPU vs. having to spend such a large chunk of the budget just on RAM like the new Xbox will, assuming it does drop next year while still in the midst of this RAM crisis.

Reaper22_141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

People said the same thing about xbox 360 launching early but it turned out pretty good. Microsoft's R&D is much larger and more cash rich than Sony's. They have the money to do it. One of the reason Sony is waiting because they arent ready to spend billions more on hardware and the PS5 is still selling and that would definitely hurt their sales. Plus they just released Ps5 pro.
The series x isn't selling well so for Microsoft its a good time to get ready for next gen. The next console from xbox is gonna be for core gamers and no matter when sony launches it probably wont have many advances over Magnus if any at all. Im confident it will be on par or better than the next Playstation. Even the series x does features that ps5 or the pro still cant do. Sony shouldn't of released the PS5 pro. Imo its not needed and underwhelming. They could of used what they spent on that for the PS6

salis844141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

First, no one actually said that PS6 is delayed.

The rumor started with Tom Henderson saying he thought PlayStation might consider delaying the PS6 due to RAM prices. He specifically did not say that he heard that they were going to delay it or anything like that, it was 100% speculation, and he never implied otherwise.

That said, let them delay it, the PS5 Pro especially with FSR 4 coming in the next month or so, will be more than sufficient. There isn't going to be any publishers, including Microsoft, willing to skip PlayStation's user base, especially when publishers seem eager to put games on Switch 2 which is a significant step down even from the base PS5. So, the idea that having more power is really going to shift things in their favor is extremely hard to believe.

Microsoft can make as many consoles as they want, the issue is convincing people to buy them.

Both the PS5 and the Switch 2 sold double the amount of consoles in December that the SX sold in the entire year of 2025. And I doubt that a super expensive co-pilot box is going to help them, especially if you look at the lackluster sales AI equipped PC's have seen.

141d ago
Eonjay141d ago

The next Xbox issaid to have 36 GB of memory so the price short from ram should not be as apocalyptic as a 64 GB kit. With the PS6 coming in with 30 GB, the RAM should not be what makes the Xbox cost so much more. Of course without Microsoft subsidizing the console the actual MSRPs may diverge wildly.

fr0sty141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

32GB of DDR5 still costs in the neighborhood of $250-300 for the super cheap stuff, $450 for the name brand. That's what entire consoles used to cost. That eats up a huge chunk of the budget that was supposed to be paying for the CPU and GPU, which means that the cost of this system will be driven farther north than previously anticipated, and it was already expected to be above $1k. Releasing a console in the middle of an industry-wide RAM shortage is stupid. Even GPU makers are scaling back production because of it, and focusing their remaining stock and production towards selling to datacenters. Some memory manufacturers have dropped consumer products entirely and now only make chips for datacenters. Nvidia is scaling back its consumer GPUs, no longer offering the super series of some GPUs, for instance.

For MS to pull the trigger now means releasing at a very risky price point against a PS5 that is simply on fire, even outselling the Switch 2 in many cases. It's coming at a time where the Xbox brand is at its weakest ever, and consumer confidence in the brand is at absolute rock bottom. Nobody wants to drop $1500 on an Xbox when they can play the same games on their PS5 Pro for half the price already, or even cheaper if using a base PS5. Only a select few enthusiasts will bother to fork out that kind of money... by the time this product reaches a price point where it can have mass-market appeal, the PS6 will be dropping... but by that time, RAM prices will be dropping, so PS6 will now be able to, assuming it does delay until 2029, invest more into upgrading its architecture over the previously released spec, invest in more RAM than the new Xbox will have, a better CPU & GPU, etc.

As for nobody saying PS6 will launch in 2029, nobody said it would come sooner either, not officially, at least. As of now all we have to go by are rumors based on internal information that could easily change at a moment's notice. Even the design of the chip itself could change as it has not yet entered into production. They could easily opt to include a few more CUs, more RAM, more CPU cores, etc. between now and when it does officially enter production. So, MS could drop a new Xbox now, but it wouldn't be wise, at all, for them to do so if they plan on even holding a candle agains the juggernaut that will be PS6. PS5 will most likely mop the floor with it due to its price point alone.

And that's assuming MS even gives the green light to start manufacturing the console to begin with. We'll see in the coming months if production even happens. Microsoft's shareholders damn sure aren't going to be willing to subsidize anything at all after they just dumped $100b into buying game publishers, expecting to see a ROI, and not seeing it anywhere near as fast as they'd hoped, which is why we're now playing Xbox games on PS5.

As for MS sitting on RAM, they are sitting on some, but Xbox is sitting on none. Microsoft knows good and well they will make far more money putting that RAM into datacenters than they ever would putting it into a console that is already at a huge disadvantage before it even launches, and has little hope of generating a lot of sales.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 141d ago
Neonridr141d ago

It'll end up being a Windows based machine that utilizes an Xbox ecosystem as well to play their game library on. But you'll end up being able to buy games from places like Steam as well more than likely.

Would make the most sense honestly. Best of both worlds.

Agent75141d ago

Microsoft should just ditch Xbox and cash in on PC and PlayStation games, maybe even Switch 2. Apparently, they make a loss on hardware, so what's the point?

Reaper22_142d ago

How can this be? Xbox died already.

141d ago Replies(1)
mkis007141d ago (Edited 141d ago )

What Xbox was is dead. Long live Xbox. I mean Halo and fable are coming to PlayStation this year. Gears and forza are already there. I'm here for it. I will absolutely give MS publishing my money if they make good games.

141d ago Replies(1)
Elda141d ago

My XBOX Series X is my first & my last XB console.

Show all comments (21)