All Channels
Popular
200°

Sunset Overdrive PC ad is not true

Mike Ybarra from Microsoft Studios says it's false

Roglog4233d ago

So the classic case of " It's not true until way say it is"?

Double Toasted4233d ago

Seems to me I bought the right console then...👌

Abash4233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

Considering Insomniac owns the IP and every former Xbox One exclusive that wasn't owned by MS has gone to PC.... I really doubt this was a "mistake"

Dewitt4233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

It was a random ad in a newspaper, it was obviously a mistake. Someone confronted the person who posted the ad and even she said she made a mistake. Give it up, this not believing the publishers bs is getting really old.

Kayant4233d ago

@Dewitt

What are you on about? The ad is an official ad from MS put on websites that appeared on Dailymail.co.uk(Shitty but not random newspaper website) and the other thing you're talking about as not relation to the OP's post on neogaf that was another person claiming a PR person told them that it was coming to PC at a event which turned out to be a mistake.

http://ds.serving-sys.com/B...

radler4233d ago

@Dewitt

Remember when they said Dead Rising 3 would never come to PC? Publishers lie all the time.

bleedsoe9mm4233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

@Abash the idea that this game will come to pc in 6-10(whatever the terms the ms contract state) months is not unlikely . the bigger question is why some people frame it as negative , ms is making a conscious choice to sign contracts like this . its good for devs to get access to the xb1 market then get a second kick of the can to 80 million steam users , its win(MS) , win(devs) , win(gamers) . People need to remember that is phil spencers stance that exclusives had very little to do with the 360's success . this has got to be appealing to 3rd party devs looking to sign an exclusive deal with ms for their game , its terms they won't get with sony .

Foehammer4233d ago

It also proves one other point...

Based on how quickly the tools rushed in to the failed article...

it proves that there is a huge amount of interest in SSO.

Best of luck on your new release Insomniac

u got owned4233d ago

Who cares if it comes to PC down the road. It means more people will get to enjoy the game.

Dewitt4233d ago

Kayant you incorrect on both accounts, definitely a random newspaper site and that was directly related to this claim. Do your research.

Kayant4233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

@Dewitt

Just because you don't know of dailymail doesn't mean it's some random website... Seriously some claims sometimes - http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

And if am wrong on my second claim please point me towards your evidence.

Here is mine -

First quote-
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Person coming back with reply from PR -
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Completely separate to first report of the ad from a different user - http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

There's only one person here who clearly needs to do their research.

Dewitt4233d ago

Probably because I was in a PM conversation with the person that talked to the rep from dailymail. Which is alot more accurate then linking me false info. Clearly it was a mistake, case closed.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4233d ago
CloudRap4233d ago

Honestly who cares if it comes out on pc? Its not like this is a system seller and PC is essentially a super xbox so either way MS profits from it.

aceitman4233d ago

They also said ryse and do wasn't going to pc, (going) cause it's now on pc. And then there are some who wonder why they can't be believed on anything they say.

Kayant4233d ago

I think after all that has been happening with game PR these days I have little trust in anything these companies says until I see it with my eyes.

TheWatercooler4233d ago

History shows that you can't take Microsoft at face value with anything they say. I say wait and see on this one

lelo2play4233d ago

If the X1 exclusives get released later on other platforms, then what's the point on having a X1?
Microsoft really needs to keep exclusive their X1 exclusives.

Automatic794233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

@Lelo

The point is to allow X1 to build an excellent portfolio all while allowing developers to continue making money on a pc platform. Its a win win for MS developers and gamers. Having console exclusive is still exclusive on Xbox One. I love my Xbox One glad to see the games that are coming out on it.

Note developing games is expensive sooner or later the competition will adopt this strategy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4233d ago
MegaRay4233d ago

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Lol

ic3fir34233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

Those who say that the Xbox One games will come out later on pc, are the same as expected Halo 3.4, reach, odst, Gears 2.3,Fable 2,3, Forza etc ... (they never came) 90 % of exclusive Xbox, never release on pc, but many think that almost all end up out -_-

dirkdady4233d ago

All the games you listed with exception to gears (previously) are first part games. Most 2nd party xbox games have also jumped to the PC.

ic3fir34233d ago

I know, but many think it is possible

And the IPs are the MS rarely end on pc, Quantum Break and ScaleBound are IPs of MS, and not Platinium or Remedy

Halo MC, Halo 5, Forza Horizon 2, forza 5,Quantum Break, ScaleBound, Phantom Dust, Crackdown, Fable Legends, only ends on pc if Microsoft wants (95% almost certainly not)

ocelot074233d ago

Heads up Fable 3 did come to PC. As well as Fable Anniversary.

Septou4233d ago (Edited 4233d ago )

Bullshit

macethedon4233d ago

Not true until it is of course.

Show all comments (61)
320°

Sunset Overdrive PS5 Port Ruled Out In Favor of Wolverine

Insomniac has confirmed that a PS5 port for 2014's Sunset Overdrive is not currently planned due to a focus on Marvel's Wolverine.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
RaidenBlack702d ago

:(
.
(well, they're likely also working with Nixxes for the inevitable Spider-Man 2 PC port as well)

Cacabunga702d ago

Wise decision, enough with old gen games already!!!

DarXyde701d ago

Sunset Overdrive was great...

I quite enjoyed the Demons' Souls remake too. I'm more or less begging for a Bloodborne sequel but would snap up a remake in a heartbeat.

Concertoine701d ago

I’d rather play an older unique game than a new Marvel game.

Im so blown out on Marvel, I can’t fathom how some people seem to have a bottomless appetite for it. A studio like Insomniac could do way better.

just_looken701d ago

Yep those poor devs are now a marvel sweat camp

This port and a quick pc patch to fix some bugs would have been a great idea i actualy forgot its not on ps5 you think it would have by now.

But hey they got like you said spiderman 2 pc port then spiderman 3 then spiderman collection with a wolverne/blade tossed in.

Amplitude701d ago

From everything we've seen, it's not like Insomniac is being forced to make Marvel games - it's clearly a good partnership that results in good games. They're still making Ratchet games anyway which is what really matters

Redemption-64701d ago

I have no idea why people like you keep making lies. Does it help you sleep at night? Where are you getting this information that they are either being forced or made into a Marvel camp? Sony approach Insomniac when they were independent to work on a Marvel IP and they picked Spider-Man. After the success of Spider-Man, it was Insomniac who pitched Wolverine to Sony/Marvel and was given the green light

702d ago Replies(5)
-Foxtrot702d ago

This is new…it pretty much confirms it can happen eventually.

I thought Microsoft had publishing rights or something

Eonjay702d ago

Yes you are right. Microsoft allegedly has rights to the first game. Perhaps Microsoft wasted to sell it back to Sony in exchange for a port to Xbox Series. This would make the statement make more sense because I can't imagine that a port of this game even compares to the creation of Wolverine. So Microsoft probably requested a multiplat port.

gold_drake702d ago

yeh, the article says as much that MS does have publishing rights.

Profchaos701d ago

They do but Microsoft doesn't really care about the game they are considering Halo 1 for ps5 so this would be nothing

badz149701d ago

MS doesn't just have the publishing rights for SSoD, they also have publishing rights for the next 2 games in the franchise!

Zeke68701d ago

" The game was later pitched to various publishers, which rejected them because Insomniac demanded to retain ownership of the intellectual property. The project was later pitched to Microsoft Studios, which was eager to work with Insomniac. Microsoft allowed Insomniac to own the rights to the game"

Seems Insomniac own the rights after all...

badz149701d ago

@Zeke68

publishing rights is not the same as IP rights or ownership. for SSoD, Insomniac owns the IP, MS owns the publishing rights. just like Sony with Spider-man. Sony only owns the publishing rights to the movies and games but the IP is still owned by Marvel/Disney.

Zeke68701d ago

See my comment below. When Insomniac left M$ they let Microsoft keep their publishing rights for... drumroll... Xbox and PC.
If they want to release it on PS they can let Sony publish it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 701d ago
Abnor_Mal702d ago

“It is important to note that Xbox owns the publishing rights to Sunset Overdrive.

Therefore, a PS5 port would need to be approved by Microsoft.”

I said this eight days ago and got disagrees.

Fishy Fingers702d ago (Edited 702d ago )

Most people dont read bro..

Had it been their IP through and through it would of been an easy release for them and its a fun game, probably would of already happened. The people saying no ones cares about Sunset Overdrive would be saying cant wait to play in 4K 60 if announced

NotoriousWhiz701d ago

"Most people dont read bro.."

Facts.

Zeke68701d ago (Edited 701d ago )

"Most people dont read bro..."

"The game was later pitched to various publishers, which rejected them because Insomniac demanded to retain ownership of the intellectual property. The project was later pitched to Microsoft Studios, which was eager to work with Insomniac. Microsoft allowed Insomniac to own the rights to the game. Sunset Overdrive was made for Microsoft's Xbox One console; it was released on the 20th anniversary of Insomniac, in 2014"

What I read is that Insomniac still own the rights to the game. Prove me wrong! ;)

Edit M$ owns publishing rights on Xbox, not Playstation as they never intended to release it on PS ever.

KwietStorm_BLM702d ago

We can forget about all of their iconic IPs. They're a Marvel studio now.

Show all comments (43)
320°

10 Years Later, Sunset Overdrive Still Remains A Beloved Xbox Exclusive

Does it still hold up in 2024?

We've still got a few months to go, but October marks the 10-year anniversary of this Insomniac Games title, with the developer having since moved on to work on the Marvel's Spider-Man games for PlayStation. It was assumed that Sunset Overdrive might make its way to other platforms eventually, but that hasn't happened as of yet.

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
Christopher784d ago

So beloved that it sold so well that there's a sequel and Insomniac never had the opportunity to go back to Sony to develop games exclusively for Sony.

RaidenBlack784d ago

ngl, I was low-key expecting Sunset Overdrive to migrate to PS as well along with Hi-Fi Rush and SoT

Christopher784d ago

I think that would require Insomniac going back to work on it to port it over, probably why that's not happening.

RaidenBlack784d ago

Didn't Sony help with SoT port?

Christopher784d ago

I think only in so far as they support every piece of software heading their way? They have that team who specializes in helping people port games, not just SoT, and then the one team that takes PS5 games and ports them to PC (that's their full time job essentially). But that team, the former mentioned one, doesn't do all the work, just help out with how to best do things. So, that team wouldn't port a whole game like Sunset Overdrive.

RaidenBlack784d ago

Ok I thought you meant Insomniac reluctant/Sony not permitting them to go back and work on Overdrive. Hence I added the participation from Sony's side.
But yea, In actuality its Insomniac not having spare dev time to get involved in the port work, atm.

Christopher784d ago

*** But yea, In actuality its Insomniac not having spare dev time to get involved in the port work, atm. ***

Definitely this. They're working on two major IPs as it is and Sony forced them to layoff some people at the end of last year as well. So, likely not capable of sparing the time because resources are being fully utilized.

badz149784d ago (Edited 784d ago )

There was an article awhile back talking about the situation with SSoD. Insomniac does own the IP and Sony now owns it after they bought Insomniac but the publishing right for SSoD is owned by MS - at least the 1st game still is. MS has to sell the publishing rights like they did with the first Mass Effect game to EA after EA bought Bioware before Sony can do anything with the IP.

Einhander1972783d ago

Nobody cares about Sunset Overdrive, except all the xbox fanboys who didn't buy it but like to come into articles about the game and try to act like it's somehow Sony's fault for whatever reason.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 783d ago
darthv72784d ago

there was supposed to be a sequel. IG had it all planned but MS said no. And Sony wont greenlight a sequel if they cant get the first one away from MS. Plus... IG has other projects they moved on to anyways so...... yeah.

fr0sty783d ago

Well, with the recent change in policy towards exclusivity, I imagine Sony could get MS to port it over.

Zeref784d ago

Because a game needs to sell 10 million copies for it to be considered beloved 😂

Christopher784d ago

I mean, it's also not a highly rated game, not even in Insomniac's top ten or even top ten on Xbox that year. With this logic, any game can be beloved and so throwing around the word beloved means absolutely nothing. Doesn't have to sell or have great critical reception, just a handful of people need to love it.

Hofstaderman784d ago

You guys are so starved for games you reminiscing about a decade old game made by a now Sony studio. Of course it never sold 10 million, the vast majority of people bought a PS4.

LucasRuinedChildhood784d ago

A game not played by many can still be beloved by those who played it, yeah.

Only making a profit of $567 after 10 years shows that it was not as beloved as it should have been though. That's really bad.

As much as people complain about AAA games not being unique or having fun ideas or bringing in new IP, a lot of gamers don't show up for them. Even less people seem to have played Hi-Fi Rush.

783d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic783d ago

It was okay when I played it on PC, idk if I'd consider it one of the more beloved games of that generation.

Zeref783d ago

@Christopher

8s and 9s is not highly rated, okay buddy 😂

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 783d ago
MontyeKristo783d ago

I mean, it sounds like you're just hating on the game - but, I loved it. It was one of my favorite games of it's time and that generation. Replayability could have been better, but I still managed to play it several times. I would have greatly appreciated a sequel and definitely would have been in line to pick it up..

Things happen.

Christopher783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

***I mean, it sounds like you're just hating on the game***

No, that's all the people who refused to accept that this game was beloved and never even bought it. I, on the other hand, bought, played it, thought it was 'okay' and moved on.

Now, what hate did you see in my post other than listing the fact that it's not as beloved as the few who liked it? This and Days Gone get way more love in online discussions than they do in sales and support, I find. Both are okay games, not much more. But for some **unknown** reason, people prop them up often as more than they are.

Profchaos783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

It's in noabs land unfortunately as Microsoft own the publishing rights to sunset overdrives original game while insomniac own the IP.

So Microsoft would have to be onboard with publishing this game on PlayStation systems with the understanding the would not profit from any subsequent games in the franchise unlike the games they are currently releasing on ps5 to get players into their franchises this would be a small cash injection build a fanbase around a game they no longer own then nothing.

ChasterMies783d ago

I really don’t get the love for Sunset Overdrive. It’s one of the few games I bought, played a few hours, gave up, and never returned.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 783d ago
isarai784d ago

Not beloved enough for Xbox owners to buy it apparently, Xbox was the worst possible audience for that game.

Obscure_Observer784d ago

Sony couldn´t give a f* about Insomniac´s freedom of creativity, that´s why you don´t have a port for that game and will not be getting a sequel either!

That franchise wil probably never make a comback thanks to Sony´s greed for money, which have turned Insomniacs into a Marvel´s slave factory until 2030.

It´s sad, but it is what it is.

ApocalypseShadow784d ago (Edited 784d ago )

I didn't know that Ratchet and Clank were part of the Avengers of Marvel? Hidden in the ending credits of Guardians of the Galaxy or something? Captain Marvel?

Beyond the "cry me a river" of your comment that these Marvel games aren't on Xbox, it was Insomniac that was approached by Sony to work with Marvel to make a game. And let them decide what character they wanted to develop. They chose Spider-Man. Must be highly profitable for them. Wolverine is a profitable, recognizable character. And the X-Men definitely are a hot property that gamers would love as a story based videogame. Being that X-Men 97 brings back a popular Saturday morning cartoon and the introduction of the X-Men into the MCU movies coming up.

It was Microsoft's continued incompetence in cancelling the Marvel MMO game and turning down Marvel in making a super hero game as they were asked first.

Keep the tears flowing. It's not greed. It was smart business to say yes. And maybe Insomniac wants to make these games. And not a game that didn't sell well to an audience that doesn't buy games.

Christopher784d ago (Edited 784d ago )

Neither does Microsoft either, based on your own argument here. Microsoft denied the sequel, not Insomniac/Sony. There's also no sign that Microsoft is allowing a port. They control the next two games in the IP and any DLC or the like for the first. But, nothing.

What's sad is people trying to use this game to blame businesses for doing business things that they are both doing as some way to make them look worse. Microsoft wants to use Insomniac to make a good IP that sells their platform and Sony wants to use Insomniac to make a good IP that sells their platform. But, no, Sony bad!

Don't know why the truth that these companies are very much alike is so hard for people to accept.

PhillyDonJawn784d ago

I bought it, along with at least 1-2 million others.

PrinceOfAnger784d ago

Very fun game that need a sequel.

-Foxtrot784d ago

Insomniac: “We went with Microsoft because we want to own the IP so it’s ours”

Microsoft: *owns publishing rights preventing the studio to re-release the original game, make a remaster, remake, any DLC, massive expansions and multiple sequels on other platforms*

The logic is just…I never got it

Owning the IP was Insomniacs main defence when they announced they were making a game exclusively for MS and yet they’ve ended up “owning” an IP they can’t do anything with.

If they went with Sony like normal you might have seen a sequel by now.

Tacoboto784d ago

The winner of the Logic Cake has to be Bungie, though.

Wanted to be free from Halo and MS, so they buy themselves out, only to partner up with Activision, in the same timeframe as Activision ousting the heads of Infinity Ward, for a full decade with Destiny.

... And then things start falling apart in that relationship almost immediately, whodathought!

Christopher784d ago

Hey, when Sony offers to overpay you for your services and signs a contract that says they won't force you to do anything you don't want, who would say no? Such an overpriced purchase from Sony. Poor business, IMHO. But, honestly, I'm not a business person. But, still, I don't understand it.

darthv72784d ago

...and it seems this conundrum is also why the game cannot receive any sort of FPS boost patch for Series consoles. IG wont make it, and Ms can't get another team to do it without consent from IG. I liked it on XBO, but now I also have this on PC and I can tell ya... it definitely benefits from a 60fps frame rate.

badz149783d ago

been playing it at 1080p144fps on my modest pc. not the hardest game to max out and yeah this game definitely needs to be played at high fps considering all the actions

darthv72784d ago

Sadly this may never get the proper fps update it deserves on XB (or even PS) but I now play it on steam and it definitely feels better at 60fps than it did at 30. Its a fast paced game... you need that 60fps in this one.

babadivad783d ago

This game was so fun. Me and my brother put many hours into this one.

Show all comments (52)
120°

15 Top Notch Single-Player Games You Can Complete in 10 Hours

For those who don't have time for massive open worlds or role-playing games with epic tales, these 15 games are worth checking out.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
anast811d ago

Good games for the $9.99 bin, you can get all of the Metro's for $10 in a bundle.