Xbox was is was already reaching limit. SDK was used to keep up and power gap was too big to be closed by sdk update.. Funny how some people thought it will close the gap.

So they thought that 10 percent tflop increase on x1 was huge increase, but 40 percent tflop on ps4 was not? There is power difference and gap won't close.

Ghosts didnt really look that much diff on ps4 and x1...i did the comparison right on my own tv. but the 1080 res deff gave it a clear edge. at any rate, ghosts was far from impressive graphhically and so i was discouraged by the 720 res. at least here, we get to 900p with a still solid 60fps and all while running a much more taxing engine. so yea, people can go ahead and start the res debate and crap all over the x1 version etc. but to me it is more than fine.

I think it's worth bearing in mind that we haven't even seen the PS4 version of this game. It's not quite fair to critisize the XBOXONE version without evidence that the PS4 version outperforms it.

From what we know of Activsion, and Call of Duty across last generation. It would not surprise me if both versions were sub 1080p.

i hope its locked 60. ghosts on ps4 had bad dips even in single player. i played all the cods on 360 and the next gen version i tried preformed the worst.

@jspsc123

PS4 version wasn't capped so it would go up to 90 which would "seem" as stutter to some.

i thought it was dips not spikes in the frame rate but i could be wrong. what ever it was it was horrible

How about you give money to the people that deserve it. You know the people that made it. You do Realize that GameStop doesn't make anything right? That giving them money is akin to saying I don't believe developers deserve the $$ for their hard work.

No I know all you care about is saving $20, forget making sure there are as many game studios as possible to make games so we can have diversity.

I was thinking kijiji, gamestop is a sham. If someone does not like the game after buying it for full price then I'll gladly take it off their hands. Also, there has been a price hike where I live this generation, I'm not going to accept that for a game I won't play a ton, it's not worth 70 dollars.

You realize most the money goes to Activision right? And if that person can't sell it on Kijiji then they're going to go to gamestop (EB games here), where they will buy it for cheap and line their own pockets. If the game is good I'll get the seasons pass on PSN/XBL and that will make the game the price it should be, 60 dollars, assuming it's 40 online.

The guy who bought it isn't going to be playing it, and he still payed full price to the publishers/developers.

Your point is invalid as f***, and my time used in order to get 60 dollars justifies the purchase, while 90-100 dollars is too much. Doing the math I can save 30-40 dollars and cost the developer nothing while inhibiting gamestop rip off trade in values.

@ThePope

Normally I'd agree, but Activision can go **** themselves.

If the game's any good, they'll make the money back with the stupid amount of DLC they overcharge for.

Whoever buys the copy of the game is free to do with it as they wish. Selling it to someone else is perfectly fine.

The last assassin's creed also ran at 1080p on the PS4 and look how that panned out.

different engine, different team.

You realize more PS3 games had dedicated servers than 360, right? It's not like they can't use them on every game it's that they don't want to because of cost. Oh and guess what happens 5 years down the road when they take down the servers? Yeah, the game is unplayable.

I realise there is a difference between what Sony can offer and what Microsoft can offer. And I realise previous COD games have been peer to peer.

Why does my hypothetical question bother you so much?

Why does my comment bother you so much? I wasnt even responding to your question but to the other part of your comment. Obviously this is not a Microsoft made game so it's all upto Activision's discretion. Therefore your analogy makes no sense as they have access to PS4s hardware but not Microsoft's servers.