All Channels
Popular
130°

Destiny Needs a Story with Consequences

GoodGameBro writes,"For all that Destiny does right—core gameplay, engaging stylistic development, addictive loot, and ease of social interactivity—there are an almost equivalent number of aspects of the game which prove disappointing and divisive among the critics and general community."

Read Full Story >>
goodgamebro.com
Spinal4235d ago

No it doesn't. Just like every mmo before it.

Gameplay is what makes a game stand firm and ahead of all other failed projects.

All Destiny needs now is to roll on more raids and crucible game modes/maps and more exotic weps and armour. And I'm all in lol.

RedstonerMC4235d ago

While i agree it needs that the story is very lackluster. It needs those things plus IN GAME grimoire cards and some more substantial quests. A little less protecting Dinklebot and a little more doing other things.

Audiggity4235d ago

Meh. The mechanics were good, but, rinse, repeat and grind? Come on, what year is it?

Nonsense. Sold it.

Much more fun to play something like Mordor, Forza or even stick with GTA V... heck, I'd rather replay Skyrim than to waste more time w/ Destiny.

The "loot genre" - nice! This is what we're calling uninspired and repetitive games now? Whatever, to each their own.

thekhurg4235d ago

No different than any other shooter except for the adoption of all the pve content as well as crucible stuff.

MysticStrummer4235d ago (Edited 4235d ago )

How did people like you buy the game and not know what it was well ahead of time? There were numerous previews and even alpha/beta testing. The gameplay wasn't exactly a secret, so if you don't like it that's your own fault.

OT - A story with consequences wouldn't work for this game.

Audiggity4233d ago

If you must know:

I knew what it was at the core, but shocked at ultimately how shallow and repetitive it became. Even played the beta... I was hoping for large scale battles, huge enemies (like the giant spider mech from Halo), fluid/non linear character development...

What can I say? I'm a gaming optimist that wanted something new to play with my friends. Optimism was shattered after the first week or so.

So... I sold it. My faith in Bungie has now been GREATLY reduced as a result. Next time I roll the dice with a Bungie game will be far more calculated purchase or something I dig out of the bargain bin.

I'm not the only one, there was half a shelf dedicated to pre-owned copies of Destiny at my local Gamestop. People had faith, that was squandered, now Bungie will have to make good on that with their next game by actually trying something innovative. A trait in which Destiny absolutely did not have.

thekhurg4235d ago

No it doesn't. It's a MMO and doesn't need a meaningful story because that's not what these online focused games are about. These ignorant websites need to just come to the realization that they don't understand the genre and to move on to a different genre.

porkChop4235d ago

Destiny is not an MMO. Far from it. It has quite a bit of MMO-like features, but nothing about the game is MASSIVELY multiplayer.

porkChop4234d ago

No. It isn't. MMOs have hundreds or thousands of players roaming around the same world, together. In Destiny you have around 12 players at most. And that's only in the Tower, or in PVP. Pretty obvious that you don't understand the concept of what an MMO actually is.

thekhurg4234d ago

Everyone is connected to an online world, just because their server infrastructure doesn't allow for a thousand players to be present on the same map at the same time doesn't mean shit. Everyone in Destiny is inter-connected to provide seamless transitions between zones to be matched up with other people running around.

It's still a MMO. Pretty obvious you're too goddamn stupid to understand the core mechanics of this game and how it functions exactly like a MMO in basically every aspect.

porkChop4234d ago (Edited 4234d ago )

It doesn't matter if it functions *like* an MMO. It's NOT an MMO. The game is not MASSIVELY multiplayer, or do you really not understand what the term even means? Just because everyone is connected to the same main servers doesn't mean anything, it's still not an MMO because they aren't actually playing together. Having a 3-person fireteam, and having 12 people in a PVP match doesn't make the game an MMO. Having MMO-like instances doesn't make the game an MMO, because at no time is the game ever large-scale multiplayer. Destiny is an FPS that borrows some MMO elements. That's it.

DragoonsScaleLegends4235d ago

I was interested in getting this game until the reviews came out and said it has no story.

slappy5084235d ago

Bit late for that now innit?
The best they can do is continuing to add more content to the game. At least the gameplay itself is far from broken.

Show all comments (27)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans479d ago (Edited 479d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr478d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast627d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

627d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris627d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

627d ago
anast627d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole627d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast627d ago (Edited 627d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

627d ago
anast626d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 626d ago
Profchaos627d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_627d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981627d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140627d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85627d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj627d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman627d ago (Edited 627d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake626d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn626d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg626d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07626d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

626d ago
Knightofelemia626d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 626d ago
Chevalier626d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom626d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac626d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake626d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark626d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde626d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125626d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)