All Channels
Popular
600°

Sony Admits Lack Of Developer Support

Sony have at last faced the awful truth that we have all known from the outset, that has given us a library of uninspired ports, frame rate issues and uninspired unique IP's: The difficulty in developing for the PS3 has driven away developers.

Read Full Story >>
gamerchip.com
HighDefinition6562d ago

People are gonna want to hope on the PS3 train. All it takes is one game to make devs envious, MGS4 is that game. The PS3 has started to really show it`s advantages.

LordXenu6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

mgs4 if i am not wrong has given the ps3 a big boost in sales. i am gunning for 400k for june's NPD. Most stores would be restocked with new mgs4 bundles tomorrow according to some Gaf members. 80,000 bundles were sold on june 12 . expect an extra 100k odd of ps3 sales for the last 2 weeks of june

@edit
i have reported the article as SPAM . By clicking on LINK you are taken to the front page of ps3fanboy

WTF!!!!

juuken6562d ago

Yep.
They better not miss the train either.

Millah6562d ago

The link seems to work for me, takes me to the article.

JokesOnYou6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

All MGS4 proved is that with alot of time and money you can make a great game on ps3....thats not a new concept. I'm playing the game here and there between work and aside from the lengthy cutscenes I don't see anything that couldn't have been done on 1 360 disc. The graphics are good but honestly nothing like "OMG this can't be done on 360", games like Bioshock, COD4 and Gears still hold their own or look a bit better in comparison imo, the gameplay mechanics aren't like somekind of new revolutionary stuff the 360 can't do. So basicly all I see is that Kojima needed bluray simply to create a game with long winded cutscenes and keep it on 1 disc...I mean seriously nothing against MGS4, but honestly this is a game filled with short films, I would prefer less and more gameplay but hey I'm not the biggest MGS fan and from what I'm hearing they like it that way, thats cool Kojima had a vision and it is what is, it may be a bit much at times but its still a great game....but just like some of the great exclusives on 360 it doesn't prove any advantage over the ps3, just as MGS4 hasn't shown any advantage over 360....the ONLY advantage it provides for the ps3 is the fact that its NOT on the 360 and vice versa for all 360 exclusives. Hardcore fanboys don't like it but both consoles have strengths and weaknesses but a good dev could recreate an almost identical version of any game released so far on either hardware....its a simple matter of dev time and money, ironicly both of which it takes more of on the ps3.

Also even if a dev was willing to spend that kind of time and money it won't be the norm because MGS4 also has the advantage of the brand name which almost assures it reaching a healthy amount of sales....for other new IP's and lesser known sequels even with a large bugdet and lengthy dev time there is still a substantial risk factor (flop, it happens).

JOY

Bladestar6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

lol... I take you didn't read the article... MGS4 will not convince nor will be an example of what developer can easily do... MGS4 is an example of what developer can do if a) They have a ton of money. b) Have full support and help from Sony. c) allow 4-5 years of development... This is something that not all developers get by default hence why "Sony Admits Lack Of Developer Support"... Metal gear is one of those games that you only see once on a console generation... don't expect to see Metal Gear 5 on the PS3... probably on the PS4...

People saying that now after MGS4 things will be easier for developer... are not taking under consideration what it took to make MGS4... assuming that other independent studios can play the game and say, "ahhh... ohhhh... now we know... let's make our game now" without spending all the money and support from sony metal gear got... sure.

of course great games can be made on the PS3... but sadly not every developer can... they must have a ton of money and probably spend 3-5 years doing that... not every company can make such investment and still stay in business. Obviously games like metal gear and final fantasy can spend so many year in development and people would buy them... but new IPs and not so hot titles can't do that...

6562d ago
LaChance6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

sorry man but 4 years and one MASSIVE budget can do wonders on any console , even the Wii.

Res 2 amaller buget and less time...look at the result.Not bad but...

Geow2 bigger budget but around about same dev time...you saw those trailers yourself so cant deny the gap between Res 2 and Geow2

With the money and time required any dev can make almost any game ESPECIALLY on PS3 and 360 since no matter how much you huys try to spin it the performances of both machines so far are VERY similar.

For instance KZ2 looks good but sorry man Geow2 with a 4 times smaller budget and twice as less time (10 million dollars while Kz2 is AT LEAST at 40 , some reports even claiming 60 million or more)looks already crazy.

Imagine Geow 2 with 4 or 5 times bigger budget and 4 years dev time...

iceman28856562d ago

I agree with most of what you said. However, you point out that it takes more time and money to develop for the ps3. Therein is where I believe there will be change happening in the near future. The only reason it is more expensive now is b/c the ps3 uses newer (and untested) technology and the 360 was out for a year before.

On the newer technology front, whenever something new or different comes out as a tool people don't necessarily know how to utilize the hardware so they have to spend time and money to run tests and training to becomes accustomed to the new hardware.

On the 360 has been out for an extra year front, developers became accustomed to the skills and techniques needed to develop on the 360, so logically it is easier to use the training and skills acquired from a year of experience.

So whenever people see what MGS4 was able to do, hopefully it will push a developer to make that initial investment to learn how to best utilize the ps3, which down the road will make it cheaper and easier for that developer to make games for the ps3. At least this is what I think of when I say I think more developers will hop on the train after seeing MGS4.

Domenikos6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

Gimme 2, just 2, 360 exclusives that surpass MGS4 in overall quallity terms...

Thanks...

Bladestar6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

@Domenikos is that a trick question? You very well know that if I give you any xbox 360 game you will not accept it and I would get lots of disagrees(Practically every single PS3 fan).

But I have a better question for you... please answer...

Gimme 1, just 1, PS3 exclusives that surpass MGS4 in overall quality terms...

lol...

MGS4 is still to fresh in people's memory... lots of people are too sensitive about it... I'm sure for many fans that's the best in history and the best game that will ever be made... of course... ignoring completely that to many metal gear gameplay is not fun.

JokesOnYou6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

or they could just go with the 360 and spend less money to make the same quality game that would cost more and take longer to make on ps3...then when you add that the 360 still has a larger install base advantage and does pretty well in software sales dept you could understand why it would still make the 360 a more attractive console for most devs.....now obviously MOST devs aren't willing to pick and choose one console over the other without heavy incentive from either company, in that case smart business will be to try maximize profits by making their games multiplat, which is why most games are just that= target both install bases= multiplat....but again if any dev WANTS to go exclusive and he wants to spend less(bugdet), have shorter dev time with a decent profit margin(sales total) then the 360 is STILL the better option, ha ha unless he's Japanese and his game has "solid" in the title, lmfao.

OK, disagree if you like, argue with logic all you can but the truth is MGS4 no matter how great it is does NOT reduce dev costs for other dev or help them learn ps3 architechture any quicker to reduce dev time. Both will happen in the natural progression over the life cycle of the ps3, just like all generations before...ha ha that still has nothing to do with MGS4.

JOY

HighDefinition6562d ago

The Motorbike Chase....Those you know, know.

If you haven`t played it, you haven`t expierence NEXT GEN.

IMO, anyway.

Domenikos6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

Actually... its not a tricky question, i just wanted to see if the guys above my reply are able to argue with an example the "MGS4 is not a great improvement if we consider: blah blah blah" point.

Edit: @1080p Yes that chase... oh god i suddenly forgot i was able to shoot... it was soooo sweet

znu6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

I don't really agree with any one here (don't disagree either)

you can give any retard a studio full of people, all the time and money they need BUT that doesn't mean they are gonna come up with a good game

Studio's and People come up with great games, Kojima, Epic, Infinity Ward, Insomniac Games, whatever it may be, all came up with great games

That's all that matters, i don't give a damn about how much money they spent, i don't care about the time they spent and i defiantly don't care how many people worked for them

They had a limitation and still created a great game, good job, awesome work from them. They had everything they could possibly need, again, good job and awesome work.

I care about their finished game and all these studios created great games, period.

Edit
Everyone here who says MGS4 didn't bring anything to devs or give an advantage to ps3, your wrong, it gave inspiration.

It showed people that what they said was impossible on ps3 was possible, if they can do it, why can't we. Inspiration is the key part to all games we play nowadays,

If someone hadn't looked at the first commercial video game (PONG) and said why can't we do that, there would be no games today

Look at Zelda series, Mario, Final Fantasy, Gears, Halo, MGS, all these amazing series inspired other people to make their own games,

gaming as a whole would be dead without games like MGS4, games that show you that the Gaming Industry will develop, look at the change in games over the years, that's why every good game for every system gives that system (and every system for that matter) an advantage

iceman28856562d ago

I never stated that MGS4 itself will reduce developing cost or time, and if that's what it came across as, I apologize. What I mean to say is that by other developers seeing a game look and play as well as MGS4 has and the sales that MGS4 is experiencing, I think that it will sway some of the developers to actually put some effort into developing the game for ps3 rather than just porting it from the 360 version.

And to your first point, although we have only seen it on a couple of games so far (Uncharted, GT5:Prologue, and MGS4), that the ceiling for the ps3 is higher than the 360, or at least that's what I believe. So that is a very plausible reason to develop for the ps3 instead of the 360.

And like I said in my above post, in time dev time and cost will go down with the lifespan of the system, whenever the developers become accustomed to development techniques used in designing games for the ps3. Right now, it would be cheaper to make a game exclusively for the 360 instead of the ps3, but in a year the difference in cost and time won't be as great and (hopefully) the ps3 will realize more of its potential, making it a more attractive platform for developers.

sumfood4u6562d ago

Takes a Real man or System to speak on it an Get Stronger as the days go by!

sonarus6562d ago

Oh 4yrs and massive budget is the new excuse for MGS4 looking awesome...i see

cyclindk6562d ago

Everyone needs to remember that Gears of War is based on the Unreal Engine which has been tweaked, modified and rethouht time and time again to achieve the results they have; it's not an Xbox achievement, it's an Unreal Engine achievement that's easily replicated on other platforms.

Show me the Xbox 360 title that doesn't utilize the Unreal Engine, isn't multi-platform and has outstanding graphics and gameplay, just show me...

thewhoopimen6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

I think you guys and this article writer need to really analyze and re-evaluate your perception on how technology works. When a new multicore platform of its kind is released with no predecessor, programming tools, programming concepts, to name a few things need to be made from scratch. That's how the industry has always worked when transitioning for vaccuum tubes, to transistors, to microcircuits, quantum processing, nanotech etc. What none of you guys grasp is that the Cell isn't just a fluke but a real live technology trend that has graduated beyond the drawing board and needs to be worked with and implemented. Intel, AMD, and Via are all going down the same route. Classes like this: http://cag.csail.mit.edu/ps... are being offered from institutions such as MIT. The transition is beyond a doubt mandatory and a consumer product such as the PS3 is the perfect product to test out stuff like this. Most likely the Xbox720 will benefit plenty from the research and programming being done today on the PS3. Its one of many reasons forward-thinking game development studios are using the PS3 now as the lead platform. Sure publishers can still milk out as much as cash as they can with an older platform (ie Koei) and putoff the transition, but eventually they will need to do it. Don't tell me you think that the Xbox 720 is going to be 4 or 5 one core chips. Its going to be multicore...

N2NOther6562d ago

@znu

I don't think anyone thought a game like MGS4 was impossible. At all. It might inspire a studio in the way that they want a game that epic, but nothing MGS4 did seemed like it was impossible to achieve. And again, MGS4 had TONS of money pumped into it. That's what he meant when he said "resources". A studio doesn't want to sink a bunch of money into ONE platform when they can do what they need to on another for less.

BulletToothtony6562d ago

but you don't need 4 years and 100 million buck to do so.. like everyone here is wanting to believe and scream on rooftops..

Best example.. Insomniac... coming out with a AAA title per year.. it goes to show that once you get the hang of the ps3 you can accomplish things.

Like i've been saying a lot of fud articles will start coming out again now that mgs4 came out and did so well.. but it don't matter, every single hate and bullcrap that the ps3 got from launch, it has been overcoming it.. more support?? are you kidding me.. we're getting everything that the 360 is getting so how is the ps3 not getting support??

by mid 2009 things are gonna change so much all is gonna be left for hater to talk about is gonna be about how the xbox720 is gonna destroy the ps3 or something like that

N2NOther6562d ago

@bullettooth

I'd like to agree with you but the fact that MGS4 is one of the best and most next gen games out (I consider GTA IV to be much the same in terms of scope and next gen) and cost a sh!tload of money (as did GTA IV) makes it hard to.

No one has come close to matching those games this gen. And certainly not on PS3. Not even Insomniac. Are both of their games good? Absolutely, but nothing at all compared to MGS4.

HighDefinition6562d ago

What about GTAIV or HALO3 then.

Cause both were pretty close in time and money, and NOT close in every other way.

ip-student6562d ago

Your comment "What none of you guys grasp is that the Cell isn't just a fluke but a real live technology trend that has graduated beyond the drawing board and needs to be worked with and implemented." doesn't seem correct to me. The cell design is flawed when it comes to general purpose code. It is better suited to number crunching without the need for branchy, out of order instructions, type code. Nothing anyone learns is likely to help that. The Cell is not likely to be a future design because it has turned out to be a pain in the butt to make work well (you really have to optomize to keep those SPUs fed). That is why certain developers have said that PS3 does nothing but create a hatred for its architecture.

Is there a lot of potential power? Yes. Is the PS3 theoretically a lot more powerful than a 360? For certain, very limited applications, maybe (depends on how well you use the GPU of the 360). Is the PS3 much different than the XBOX 360 for gaming code? No, very little theoretical difference. Is the PS3 a lot harder to get to work to the XBOX 360's level? Yes.

So the bottom lime is that Sony didn't support the developers because Sony gave them a much greater burden to carry (relative to the other consoles being offered at this time). And since the XBOX 360 is a very viable alternative (except in Japan), this has hurt Sony a lot more than it did in the past.

JokesOnYou6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

yeah I prefer the 360 over ps3 so of course that makes me an "xbot", thats fine but if you actually look at what I'm saying its just common sense and I'm not bashing MGS4....in fact I'm simply disagreeing with Highdefinition's first post which frankly has a helluva lot more fanboyish slant to it than mine does.

@znu, you speak of inspiration, yeah I guess so, although I would call it "natural progression", meaning devs are constantly trying to outdo what has already been done, they see any game that turns out to be a huge hit and any dev worth his code will say: "hey I can take parts from that game, implement those features into my game and make a even better game than that one"= but the point is that type of thinking isn't *confined/limited to the ps3 simply because MGS4 is a ps3 game, and of course as I said the cost/time factor doesn't change for that dev because of MGS4= it will continue to get cheaper and shorter but that goes for the 360 as well, micro continues to refine its dev tools and the devs themselves continue to refine their game engines.

@BulletToothtony, why is anything written or commented about ps3 fud unless it says "Sony is god", and please don't start with the "2009 predictions", thats been overdone by fanboys from both camps and yet both consoles are alive and well, the article is pretty logic based and the quotes about ps3's difficulties are from sony, ha ha get a grip bro....take the red pill.

@thewhoopien, yes tech evolves doesn't mean every tech created is going to be the future, things change so fast and other ideas are produced who knows what will be the basis for the next gaming hardware.

@iceman2885, you say the ceiling is higher for the ps3 than the 360, some would say that the rsx still puts a limit on that ceiling but more importantly when will this mysterious ceiling finally begin to be tapped?, IF and WHEN it finally does maybe I'll be playing the latest and greatest next gen console from micro already.

@sonarus 4 years and a huge budget is not a "new excuse" its just reality, it happens on the 360 as well with major blockbuster games but I think the 360 does have the advantage in dev time/cost for obvious reasons.

JOY

twoface6562d ago

way to go, you joke! Show them that 360 is the way to go man. Knock into them some common sense, bring them the truth. Developers will always favor 360 because its way easier to program, even easier than on PS2. That's why even though it's a newer platform, ppl still flock to it.

MGS4 was just a meh game, nothing special. Even though it got itself loads of 10/10 scores, its really crap.

And why? The only reason is because you think so. Your opinion matters man, I mean it. You just ooze common sense and logic.

thewhoopimen6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

You're right about the cell being poor for general purpose code but wrong in the assumption that future code is going to be general purpose. Far from it, the next generation is going to be parallel, in order based and its going to have to be tailored for multi-core chips. Read the news on Nvidia planning to release its own line of GPU/CPU to challenge intel. Look at AMD buying out ATi. These manufacturers know what's up, and it ain't a general purpose processor design. Nvidia wants their GPU to be the center of your gaming/computing needs. These processors are huge number crunchers and much prefer in order execution. Go look it up. Whether developers like it or not, they will have to transition sooner or later. The cell is the reference design for the future, and each upcoming grad coming into the world is going to be equipped with the necessary knowledge to handle programming in parallel, and using this chip. They won't be telling the world how much they hate this architecture, b/c they will be brought up in this architecture. The developers that can't or won't learn this stuff will be relegated to history. Mark my words.

As I said before this article is flamebait and so are you guys talking about how its so much harder to develop for PS3. That phenomenon is increasingly becoming old news. The successful development of MGS4 by Konami (w/ a market cap of 4.58B) shows that EA (w/ a market cap of 14.95Billion), Ubisoft (w/ a market cap of 4.05B) can all learn a thing or two. Burnout Paradise, COD4, Army of Two, GTAIV, show it can be done. If a japanese company shows it can be done, it definitely can be done, and at no compromise.

addendum: Finally if you guys think that the 360 is still comparable to the PS3 visually, you need to take a look at current sales. Seems to me that everyone else in the world is looking at the PS3 as the preferred console of choice even though it clearly comes with an extra $100 sticker shock.

JokesOnYou6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

lol, great sarcasm....uhm but where did I say or imply 360 is the way to go; NO I just said its the cheaper/less time consuming option for devs= theres a difference between stating the obvious and declaring that this means the 360 will be the only choice for devs.

Where did I say or imply that MGS4 did not deserve the 10's it got or that it was a "meh game"; NO just because I don't think it showcased in technical advantage that can't be duplicated on the 360 doesn't mean that I think its a terrible game, ha ha in fact although some aspects aren't suited to my tastes, I have already stated I think its a great game.

oooooops, Oh I see this is n4g, and I forgot to declare "Sony is God", my bad.

edit: vvvvv OK thanks!...oh uhm btw, dont forget to click on "Agree" too. lmfao

JOY

twoface6562d ago

Wow! I didn't even have to read your comment. I just....agree!
How can I disagree with common sense?

And may I add, Bravo!

aceitman6562d ago

there was nothing wrong with what in said it was only saying the ps3 is better than the 360 and the 360 has reached its graphic limits and it breaks down alot i know i went through 8 of them and im still on my 1st ps3 some stupid 360 fanboy spammed me for telling the truth . you just cant handle the truth

ip-student6562d ago

I partially agree with you. There is no doubt that parallel cores are the way of the future. The power and heat issues associated with frequency ramping have killed, for the time being at least, attempts to simply go faster. So we are going to go wider and AMD/Nvidia/Intel are all working on ways to do exactly that. But I haven't seen much of anything that suggests in-order instructions are the way of the future. In fact, Nelham, Intel's forthcoming processor, has improved branch prediction. While there is going to be a place for programmable GPUs, they are still in the early stages and it is hard to tell what Larrabee will do to their adoption rate (I suspect it will kill it but it is too soon to count them out).

I personally think a reduced x86 instruction set with good branch prediction is what we will end up with - it will have enough cores to handle ray tracing and still surf the internet with ease:-)

But while I enjoy your thoughts on the future, that doesn't change that Sony (and the Cell) doesn't really compare to those arrangements. The problem with the Cell is keeping the SPUs busy whith only a single SPE to manage. A simple change to simpler cores (and more of them) isn't addressing the same problem - although there is probably some overlap. I think the PS3 would be a much better if it has two small Cells, each with a SPE working with three SPUs - you would have nearly the same theoretical performance but a lot more practical performance. Maybe give one of the SPEs 4 SPUs (the extra one to handle the OS duties).

Anyway - nice discussion so I am offering a bubble even if we don't agree completely.

GameDev6561d ago

"1.7 - @high definition
sorry man but 4 years and one MASSIVE budget can do wonders on any console "

looks over at the turd that is Halo 3 and laughs at internet fanboys.

bama6561d ago

Wow Bladestar said something intelligent. And here I was thinking he was a fanboy. Bubbles for you.

+ Show (30) more repliesLast reply 6561d ago
ash_divine6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

It's just drenching in fanboyism. I know every article is laced with a little bit of preference but this article exaggerates every point it makes. MGS4 is not the only good game, developers have not abandoned the PS3, developing for ps3 is not THAT hard, and Sony never actually denied that developing for the PS3 wasn't easy, or lied about any other serious problems they are,or were having.

jwatt6562d ago

Look at now compare to last year, devlopers are getting alot more use to the ps3. There are still a few devs who are going to have problems but they will come along.

PirateThom6562d ago

There was constant complaints for about 2 years after the PS2 launched and Metal Gear Solid 2 and Gran Turismo 3 put everyone to shame and then devs had to buck up their ideas on what sells.

If companies want to sell on PS3, they need to be the best. PS3 owners will not accept any less, which is why crap will not sell.

iceman28856562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

It seems that the article blew a lot of the stuff out of proportion. On top of that, like stated above me in 2, the article can be a little fanboyish based on the fact that he said there is only one great game on the ps3. Lastly, he tops it off with the fanboy comment "voice chatting to my friend over Xbox Live."

I mean, he could be a unbiased gamer, but why would an unbiased gamer discredit themselves by saying something that has nothing to do with the rest of the article like "I'm gonna go voice chat with my friend on XBox live." And before I get a bunch of disagrees, it would be like writing and article giving a negative spin about the state of games on the XBox360 and the hardware of the 360, then ending it with "now I'm gonna go watch a blu-ray and play games on-line for free on my ps3 without worrying about my system breaking down".

LastDance6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

If ps3 has only 1 great game (Being MGS4)...what the hell does xbox have??..

@hi def...history is repeating itself...Look

http://au.dreamcast.ign.com...

http://www.streettech.com/a...

Domenikos6562d ago

"I don't want to sound like a complete Dreamcast fanboy. The PS2 is definitely an awesome machine, and it too will have a great selection of games over the next year. I love mine, but I can't honestly say that I'd recommend it over Dreamcast." ¬_¬ (lol)

Britjadg6562d ago

posted this in open zone but original article has been taken out of context and then had bits added to it by some idiot. the following lines were cut from end of article... i wonder why? see http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

"But I think after the end of LAST year, there are more and more titles are coming out on the same day [as Xbox 360] and the same quality, and we can start to see some additional things on PS3 because of the space available on Blu-ray.

That re-architecture only needs to happen once, and once you pass that, you have the foundation ready. Moving forward I'm totally confident that developers will start to use more from the PlayStation 3 platform. This year is the year of parity, next year is the year of differentiation in favour of the PS3 platform."

GameDev6561d ago

which developers understand 1's and 0's right down to the metal and which are nothing more than MS dev tool jockeys.

bama6561d ago

Lastdance the PS3 is comparable to the Saturn in more ways than the 'cast

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6561d ago
Brian52476562d ago

Is all the third party support PS3 needs.

lol, Xbox and Wii only owners are suckers.

LordXenu6562d ago

i have reported the article as SPAM . By clicking on LINK you are taken to the front page of ps3fanboy

WTF!!!!

Sony never said anything like this. n4g is deterioting fast and real fast

GiantEnemyCrab6562d ago

"lol, Xbox and Wii only owners are suckers."

And PS3 only owners are genius right? GMAFB.

Snukadaman6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

coming from its biggest contributor of the deterioration..nice job being a crybaby when its your console being talked about. I have been saying this since most games were being dropped left and right from most of the droids lists of reasons 2008 was going to be the ps3's...you rats better jump that ship and throw them ps3's on ebay before people wise up and realize what a farce it is....times a wastin..

"By clicking on LINK you are taken to the front page of ps3fanboy"
your a liar...your taken to the gamer chip..why dont you want this story to be told...you scared someone will wise up about your precious?

lol wow look at those reports...twice from one person even...

Mr Fancy Pants6562d ago

X360 owners are suckers cuz they keep supporting an unreliable console...

Wii owners are suckers cuz they don't understand Wii Fit it's just a freaking game!!! BTW most of the owners of Wii are casuals...

PS3 owners are geniuses because in top of being buying just a console we get a blu-ray player, free online and a console that don't RRoD while playing our favorite games. Xbots can no longer say that we don't have games cuz we clearly have games. PS3 it's the ultimate console! In top of that we got: MGS4. Best. Game. This. Gen.

English is not my first language so if you don't understand something sorry. But PS3 it's the better console.

I used to be an unbiased gamer but trying to make a point in this site it's impossible so now i just defend my purchase. Anyway being a fanboy is fun.

Pain6562d ago (Edited 6562d ago )

M$: Please make your game on our Crappy system and not make it on that Much much better in every way on that other Much better'ly designed super duper baby Skynet super computer please...will Give u A$$ loads of Cash!.....

M$ lacky talks to boss: Yea we bought the rights to it..
M$ lacky boss: You spent how much!!!???
M$ lacky: yea dont worry will get more $$$ from the idiots that buy are stuff and Royalties....

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6562d ago
Raoh6562d ago

research showed that ps3 consumers did not support software that was released with half ass attempts. But jump on first and second party titles cause they know they will get quality gaming.

Old Snake6562d ago

It isn't Sony's fault that devs are being lazy. So they need to put some more work into the PS3 version. It is called "work" for a reason. Just because the 360 is easier to develope for it isn't reason to half-ass the PS3 version so the gamers suffer. I'm looking at you Ea and Valve, Orange box more like **** box.

Ashton6562d ago

most of it's new and main franchises are now being developed on PS3 then ported to 360

look at burnout paradise:it look better on PS3 since ,PS3 was the lead platform.

another examples from EA:

mirror's edge

dead space
.
.
.

Give EA credit where it's due ,,,EA has just switched to PS3 as the lead platform for game devloping

edhe6562d ago

Links for evidence please :)

generally titles start on the 360 and move to the ps3 late in the phase when the 360 one's at QA and they need to turn their attention to the ps3 version to save itself from it's idiotic architecture.

NB to those that think it's the same issue as the ps2 blah de blah - this isn't the same market as back then.

Show all comments (178)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot43d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle43d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7743d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer52d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde50d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy50d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12550d ago (Edited 50d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk7751d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga51d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer199251d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga50d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman50d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 50d ago
blacktiger50d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box51d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion50d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv7251d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent7551d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit51d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz14951d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning7751d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)