All Channels
Popular
70°

Ryse - PC vs Xbox One Video Comparison

Check out a video comparison between Ryse: Son of Rome for PC and Xbox One.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Meltic4237d ago

Im going to try out the game tomorrow. graphic looks insane good but storywise i dont Think its so good from what ive seen.

ceedubya94237d ago

It isn't bad. Good for a playthrough at least.

Wikkid6664237d ago

Graphics are great.
Story is good.
Gameplay is ok. Just very repetitive/ hack and slash.

Ka7be4237d ago

Me too Cinematics are awesome!

FPSRUSSIA4237d ago

same here i own a PS4 so this my chance to play it

Volkama4237d ago (Edited 4237d ago )

I've already played it, but I didn't have my 7.1 surround set up at the time.

I've had a dabble with it on the XBox version again since getting the AV setup and in true Crytek fashion the sound is outstanding. I want another play through just for the sound, so I may as well get the PC version and enjoy a visual bump as well.

Big_Game_Hunters4237d ago

Don't you care about the gameplay?

dmeador4237d ago

Honestly the best rental I've ever had. Fantastic on one playthrough, but the last few hours started to drag.

Volkama4237d ago

But the game was only a few hours long....

Seriously though, I agree with what you are saying. It is great for a single play, but has no real worth beyond that so the asking price was too high. But the few hours it lasted were a highlight of the launch window for me.

dmeador4237d ago

@Volkama How long did it take you? I would say it was about 8 hours on medium. From the internet machine it seemed like a 4 hour game that got horrible at 2.

Volkama4236d ago (Edited 4236d ago )

Probably about 7 or 8 I'd say. I also didn't find it overly repetitive. The combat is rhytmic and relies on pattern recognition for challenge, and personally I felt it threw in new patterns at a decent enough rate to hold my attention (if the spectacle wasn't enough).

I'm not claiming the game was perfectly refined, there are definitely numerous areas it could be improved. But overall I thoroughly enjoyed it while it lasted.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4236d ago
Trekster_Gamer4237d ago

I love this game on Xbox One. I am Glad PC gamers are getting a chance to play it.

bez874237d ago

PC looks better and plays smoother but all this boosting about how PC is so much more advance and are the master race, it just doesn't show that much truly, When will someone develop a game with the top end market in mind, I mean it's all good and well with texture bumps but I've seen nothing on PC which looks like the future, maybe I'm just expecting life like graphics on PC by now but still were getting games made at console level and then just the res boosting, or is it just me

hennessey864237d ago

The problem is PC needs to change if we are ever going to see a dramatic increase in visuals, for one the amount of different components is staggering, How is a company meant to optimize a game for a system with 1000 possible graphics cards available. Memory is another issue, PC's may have a lot of it but its split into video and system which is a bottle neck which ever way you look at it. Shadow of mordor requires 6gb of video ram to run ultra textures, you need a titan to get that kind of memory. Consoles get optimized games because they are easy to develop for, I think PC needs to be a more unified system, while still keeping the upgrades and mods available.

wannabe gamer4237d ago

you dont need a titan!!!! people need to stop with that BS, i have a 780 6GB card that was cheaper than a 780 ti 3gb and the ti is only 15% faster which is nothing when the cost is 200 more

ABizzel14237d ago

@wannabe gamer

LOL, but a 780 is in the range of a Titan performance wise, so in that regard he was correct, although I do agree you don't need a near $1,000 GPU.

But still $500 for a GPU is asking a lot for most console gamers, who entire consoles cost that much, meanwhile you still need a CPU, RAM, HDD / SSD, Motherboard, Case, and a PSU to run along with that $500 GPU, and if you want to be remotely comparable in quality to your overall PC as you were with your GPU then all that's going to cost you another $600. And that's where console gamers break, on top of not knowing how to build a PC (which is fairly easy, and takes about 1 - 2 hours tops even for a rookie).

@hennessey86

That being said I agree the graphic difference isn't worlds apart, but the resolution boost and texture quality boost are visible on the PC version, and the real benefit is that the PC version can run at 60fps compared to the XBO versions sub-par 30fps capped (meaning it was down in the 20's often).

With the recommended specs you can build an AMD gaming PC for less than $600 easy, and get 1080p @ 30 - 40 fps.

If you want XBO parity then you can use the minimum PC specs for less than $500, and get at least 720p @ 30 - 40fps (someone should really test this set-up since the XBO has been performing on par with the 7770 for the longest, so we can see if it's the perfect measure of performance scaling XBO games).

Or if you want 4k gaming then you can go to the high end for around $1,000.

Once again with PC gaming it's all about what performance you want and what you want to pay for it.

aerisbueller4237d ago (Edited 4237d ago )

Star Citizen is aimed at High End PCs specifically:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

@hennessey86 a Titan is like more than one generation of power past the consoles. Consoles allow developers to spend time optimizing, but a top of the line PC is so powerful it more than compensates for the lack of to the metal coding several times over.

DirectX and OpenGL make all the different configurations irrelevant to coders. You code it once for DX or OpenGL, or Mantle, and it works on every possible combination. The one and only reason PC games aren't lightyears ahead of console games, and haven't been all this time is because developers don't want to target the small subset of PC Gamers with anything high end that can be called a gaming PC.

It's a catch 22, because the lack of games that truly take advantage of them makes it so only the hardcore enthusiasts bother to build a high end PC.

40°

Our Story – Episode 2 – Crysis 2 to Ryse: Son of Rome

Crytek : In episode two of Our Story, the team discusses the evolution of Crysis into Crysis 2 and 3 (and the pressures that came with it), how a local connection landed an incredible collaboration with legendary composer Hans Zimmer, and the New York trip that inspired much of Crysis 2. For the gladiators among you, you’ll also get an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the development of Ryse: Son of Rome and the attention to detail that went into it.

110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw1120d ago (Edited 1120d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil1120d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz1120d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused1119d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X1375d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts1375d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies121375d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows901374d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac1374d ago (Edited 1374d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty1374d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts1374d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage891374d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1374d ago
CrimsonWing691374d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade1374d ago (Edited 1374d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer1375d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer78041375d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty18891375d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer1374d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv721375d ago (Edited 1375d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad1374d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv721374d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play1375d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows901374d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad1375d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)