I really hope they fix multiplayer.

the scoped weapons are underpowered.

The scout rifle is too slow to kill anybody in a 1v1, not to mention just weak in general.

the sniper rifle is slow as well and has no crosshair unless scoped in. I see they are trying to copy COD in that respect instead of sticking to their halo style.

The super is a horrible game play mechanic for multiplayer as well.

the auto rifle is hella overpowered and kills too quickly. One thing that made halo great is if someone shot you, you had a chance of surviving by thinking fast and challenge the opponent or find a good exit. This game eliminated that.

the game has potential but at this point, its just a scifi cod clone.

They cant patch that its not open worlds like they talked it would be.

The whole people playing control as TDM while not completely true, the way the scoring works makes it possible to play it as TDM and actually win without holding any points from kills alone. Same with Salvage, me and my friends came up against a team who seemed to always get the points before us yet we won simply because we got the most kills. I think the way the scoring works needs tweaking slightly so it's more objective based than kill based.

lol thats exactly what I thought when I saw the title. Now I know what patches do.

I expected to click and find it translated, but it isn't. All of it is like that.

ya this is not really an article, its basicly a forum wishlist with a title pretending to be an article.

weapon bonuses in crucible give it much more needed variety, leave it alone.

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

More in the 1.000 million now.

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.