260°
6.5

EGM Review: Destiny

EGM: at this moment, it’s hard to escape the sense that Destiny is a disappointment, a waste of several interesting ideas and an enormous amount of potential. Given how long they’ve been talking about their future plans for the franchise, it’s clear Bungie and Activision were banking big on this project. Like Halo before it, they no doubt wanted Destiny to be the game, the sort of phenomenon that spreads into the mainstream and redefines what the average person thinks of the industry. Instead, well, it’s just a game. Funny how that works.

dirkdady4143d ago (Edited 4143d ago )

The fact this game was largely successful without the support of media publications and their reviews signal a new age where developers can interact directly with their customers through betas to sell them on their game.

Of course gaming "journalists" will want to make an example of destiny after all if reviews are not needed then their livelihood could be at stake. Gaming news outlets are on the decline with recent massive layoffs at both gametrailers and gamepot.
No more shady press with some agenda.

gamer78044143d ago

Kinda backwards. It proves marketing and hype can push an average game to far outsell the good or great games. I am thankful for the beta though, it served as a cautionary warning and so I waited on destiny, And now i won't feel bad about waiting more, especially with forza h2, bayonetta 2 and disney marvel infinity coming out.

IVanSpinal4143d ago

the game is still generic, no matter what you say my friend

GoPanthers9994143d ago

Warframe is 10x better and free to play.

cell9894143d ago

They're similar but so different not a fair comparison

Dmagic4142d ago

that game is garbage ive played destiny more than any game this gen people just love things to hate its nothing wrong with destiny and the people not enjoying it have no friends to play with the pvp is great best this gen so far i cant see how anyone can give this less than a 8.

Bigkurz854143d ago

The criticisms are legit. But that's not stopping me from really loving this game .

I'm having a hard time understanding why destiny is getting panned while diablo 3 is loved. I just beat diablo 3 basically by spinning my barbarian in circles with his weapon for hours on end

qwerty6764143d ago

idk, i played d3 on pc when it first came out, was extremely hyped for that game.

it let me down in every aspect. the story, endgame, auctions house, just completely ruined the game for me.

granted they've changed it since then but i will not be going back.

Any diablo sequel will not be getting my money they dont deserve it.

Muzikguy4143d ago (Edited 4143d ago )

I can tell you I don't love diablo3. They let me down also with everything in the game. I don't care what they do to fix it, it's not the game I was expecting and it's a total slap in the face to diablo2 fans IMO

@Quicktim3 I agree

cyclindk4143d ago (Edited 4143d ago )

Diablo is repetitive as all holy hell too, i stopped playing very quickly.

As far as shooters go, i would say the last of us offers the most variety in terms of how each engagement goes. I have an amazing recording of one event that just leaves me in awe of how good that game is.

Single player, i flanked enemies got one and beat on em, his ally got me in a choke hold and they proceed to beat me, my ally chick comes and shoots one which frees me and i in turn grab, choke and revolver execute him and it was all so smooth and seamless:

StrawberryDiesel4204143d ago

Completely agree with you on Diablo, I really don't get the hype for that game. For me, it felt like a game that would be on PSN or LIVE, not a full fledged retail release. The entire top down view and the generic gameplay of just slashing and shooting repeatedly is just mind numbingly boring in my opinion. I would bet my left nut that Destiny is more entertaining than Diablo.

DOMination-4142d ago

Diablo has always been about the repetition of killing things, levelling up then getting sweet loot. Its fair enough that some will not like that but most are aware of how it plays because its a 15 year old franchise.

Destiny appears to follow a similar model. I have only watched gamespots now playing so haven't played myself mind. Maybe people are disappointed because they weren't expecting that? To me I would describe it as a poor mans borderlands lacking soul and personality as well as depth.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4142d ago
Scatpants4143d ago

It's much better than a 6.5 even with its faults. I'd score it around 7.5 or 8

bigbearsack4143d ago

I played the alpha and feel the game deserves a good rating. Overhype? thats just personal opinion. I haven't bought the game yet because sometime next year they will release the ultimate package of sorts.

ABizzel14143d ago

Agreed.

If you try to play it solo it's a 7.5 or 8 IMO.

If you play with friends it's an 8 or 8.5 IMO.

cell9894143d ago

With friends for me is more like a solid 9 for sheer gameplay bliss. At that point I don't care much about the story. If I'm playing alone, yeah story is everything

Sashamaz4142d ago

So low score due to your loneliness and higher score on the off chance that you might have friends?

Monstar4143d ago (Edited 4143d ago )

recycled halo combat, shitty story, shitty characters and designs, bland worlds, repetitive boring missions...the game is naturally tolerable with co-op in mind like with most co-op games cause its with your friends. 6/10 is a fair score...fact!

Show all comments (58)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans353d ago (Edited 353d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr352d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast501d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

501d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris501d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

501d ago
anast500d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole501d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

500d ago
anast500d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 500d ago
Profchaos501d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_501d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981500d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140500d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85500d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj500d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake500d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn500d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg500d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07500d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

500d ago
Knightofelemia500d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 500d ago
Chevalier500d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom500d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac500d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake500d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark500d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde500d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125500d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)